Hi there, !
Today Tue 11/27/2007 Mon 11/26/2007 Sun 11/25/2007 Sat 11/24/2007 Fri 11/23/2007 Thu 11/22/2007 Wed 11/21/2007 Archives
Rantburg
532920 articles and 1859660 comments are archived on Rantburg.

Today: 69 articles and 219 comments as of 2:46.
Post a news link    Post your own article   
Area: WoT Operations    Non-WoT    Opinion    Local News       
Tanks deployed in Beirut to prevent possible violence
Today's Headlines
Headline Comments [Views]
Page 2: WoT Background
13 00:00 3dc [5] 
2 00:00 twobyfour [2] 
0 [5] 
18 00:00 phil_b [2] 
10 00:00 Zenster [] 
12 00:00 Woozle Grereck5422 [4] 
1 00:00 Zhang Fei [2] 
1 00:00 Abu do you love [4] 
1 00:00 Abu Uluque6305 [] 
0 [] 
3 00:00 Old Patriot [3] 
5 00:00 Swamp Blondie [] 
0 [4] 
4 00:00 lotp [4] 
2 00:00 DMFD [1] 
1 00:00 Zenster [5] 
3 00:00 Zenster [2] 
0 [5] 
0 [1] 
7 00:00 Zenster [4] 
3 00:00 danking70 [4] 
Page 1: WoT Operations
4 00:00 Zenster [6]
1 00:00 Mike [6]
1 00:00 Ol Dirty American [2]
0 [1]
9 00:00 Grumenk Philalzabod0723 [3]
0 []
2 00:00 g(r)omgoru [2]
1 00:00 JDB []
5 00:00 Steve [3]
0 [2]
0 [9]
1 00:00 Zenster [3]
4 00:00 Ol Dirty American []
0 [2]
2 00:00 Redneck Jim [1]
8 00:00 Grumenk Philalzabod0723 [1]
2 00:00 Old Patriot [1]
0 [1]
6 00:00 trailing wife [2]
0 [1]
0 []
0 [5]
2 00:00 sinse []
1 00:00 Woozle Grereck5422 [6]
Page 3: Non-WoT
0 [1]
1 00:00 Besoeker []
4 00:00 OldSpook [2]
2 00:00 Jack is Back! [4]
0 [3]
2 00:00 Cyber Sarge [6]
5 00:00 Deacon Blues [2]
4 00:00 sinse []
4 00:00 Zenster [2]
0 [1]
5 00:00 James []
0 [2]
4 00:00 Zenster []
15 00:00 Old Patriot [2]
Page 4: Opinion
0 [1]
4 00:00 Woozle Grereck5422 [2]
2 00:00 ryuge [1]
3 00:00 john frum [2]
7 00:00 Zenster []
Page 5: Russia-Former Soviet Union
4 00:00 Drive by lurker [10]
6 00:00 trailing wife [2]
0 []
6 00:00 trailing wife [1]
6 00:00 twobyfour [1]
Africa Horn
About 65 would-be migrants die off Yemen coast
Sixty-five people including three children drowned in the Gulf of Aden while trying to cross from Somalia to Yemen, official Yemeni media said on Thursday.

About 15 others swam to safety after a vessel carrying the migrants sank close to the southeast coast of the Arabian Peninsula country, said the Saba news agency, adding that the survivors were Somali nationals. The Yemeni navy and fishermen pulled 50 bodies from the sea while 15 bodies were found on the beach. Many African migrants cross to Yemen, which they see as a gateway to other parts of the Middle East.
Posted by: Fred || 11/24/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under: Global Jihad

#1  It has to be pretty bad when you're willing to board a leaky boat to seek refuge in Yemen.
Posted by: Abu Uluque6305 || 11/24/2007 13:01 Comments || Top||


Arabia
Ex-Fighter in Iraq Tells His Story
A young Saudi, who was brainwashed to fight in Iraq where he narrowly escaped death and suffered scarring to his face and hands in a failed suicide attack, recently called on young Saudis not to follow in his footsteps and be wary of militant groups in Iraq. Ahmad Abdullah Al-Shaie, a young Saudi from Buraidah who describes himself as a victim, told Al-Riyadh newspaper that he was brainwashed into going to and fighting in Iraq. “The Iraqis who were supposed to train me and prepare me to fight the occupation tried to kill me by making me an unwilling suicide bomber,” said Al-Shaie, who was tricked into driving a truck full of explosives.

In 2005, Al-Shaie went to Iraq to fight American troops. The leader of his group, Abu Abdul Rahman, asked him to drive a gas tank to a place in the Al-Mansour district of Baghdad. The Saudi youngster said he was suspicious why he had been chosen. He had no experience, did not know his way around, and felt an Iraqi would have been better suited.

The young Saudi had arrived in Iraq to undergo military training to take part in the insurgency. “We thought the Iraqis were on our side. I never doubted them, as I used to see them fasting and praying. I thought they were doing jihad and it never crossed my mind that they may want to kill me,” said Al-Shaie.

On the day he was to deliver the truck, Al-Shaie was shown how to maneuver it. Iraqi fighters guided him through Baghdad and when they reached a certain point they (the Iraqis) sped off in a waiting car. Al-Shaie recalls the moment when he was left alone. “I continued driving. After around 500 meters, the truck exploded. It was a nightmare. I couldn’t believe what had happened. Twelve people died and many were injured,” said Al-Shaie, adding that later he learned that his truck, which was carrying 26 tons of liquid explosives, was aimed at bombing the Jordanian Embassy.

Al-Shaie arrived in Iraq in 2005 after meeting an old friend, who told him about jihad and stories of fighters in Afghanistan and Chechnya. The friend showed him a “fatwa” permitting Saudis to go to Iraq to fight without the approval of their parents and the ruler of the country. In the last 10 days of Ramadan in 2005, Al-Shaie told his parents he was going camping. “I knew that if I told them about my real intentions they would have objected. We went to Syria where we met a Saudi called Abu Abdullah,” he said, adding that all of the people he met used nicknames and never their real names.

In Syria, he was introduced to a Syrian man called Mazin, who arranged for his passage into Iraq. “When we entered Iraq, we met two young Iraqis carrying two Yemenis, who were wounded in Falluja. The Iraqis told us to move on before sunrise, otherwise the Americans would come after us,” said Al-Shaie.

In Iraq, Al-Shaie and his group met the leader of foreign Arab fighters. “His name was Abu Aseel and asked us if we wanted to be martyrs. None of us raised our hands because we had all come to fight and not to kill ourselves,” said Al-Shaie. The group was told of the rewards given to martyrs in Islam. However, the group remained unconvinced.

Their passports were taken from them and they were handed $100 each and sent to the Al-Anbar province where they joined a group of 40 Arab fighters. “After one week, we went to Ramadi where we were supposed to be getting training... We complained to the leader of the camp that we weren’t getting any training. He just said we would be taken to Baghdad the next day,” said Al-Shaie, adding that an explosives expert called Abu Omar Al-Kurdi received the group in Baghdad.

It was in Baghdad under Al-Kurdi that Al-Shaie was tricked into driving the truck on that fatal morning. After the truck he was driving exploded, the young Saudi, having sustained burns, was taken to the Abu Ghraib Prison Hospital. After one month, US officials handed Al-Shaie and a group of other young Saudis into the custody of the Saudi government. Al-Shaie says he does not know the fate of his friend, who brought him to Iraq. He believes he may have died fighting.

“The conditions in Iraq are very difficult... We were brainwashed and were used by these people,” he said. “Most Saudis in Iraq have gone because of fatwas permitting them to fight. However, we all know that the Kingdom’s Higher Scholar Committee has not approved these decrees. Many young Saudis that went to Iraq have been influenced by what they see on websites and hear in cassettes,” he said. “The Iraqis are not happy with foreigners fighting in Iraq. They think we’re interfering in their internal business,” he said. “I advise young Saudis not to go to Iraq.”
This article starring:
Abu Abdul Rahmanal-Qaeda in Iraq
Abu Aseelal-Qaeda in Iraq
Abu Omar Al-Kurdial-Qaeda in Iraq
Ahmad Abdullah Al-Shaieal-Qaeda in Iraq
Posted by: Fred || 11/24/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [4 views] Top|| File under: al-Qaeda in Iraq

#1  He may have been a tool, but not a victim.

But the stats of US mlitary re foreign jihadis, Sodys in particular, tell somewhat different story.
Posted by: twobyfour || 11/24/2007 0:58 Comments || Top||

#2  This is interesting info from Captain's Quarters,

The Guardian waits until the end of the article to list the third-highest contributor to the terrorists in Iraq: Yemen. This has more significance than readers might conclude, given its position in the story. The ethnic Yemenis, not the Saudis, have been the biggest problem in the war on terror, and the Saudis have the same problem with them as we do.

One of the terror-war factoids that one hears repeatedly is that the majority of the 9/11 terrorists came from Saudi Arabia. What most people don't know is that the majority of those were ethnic Yemenis from disputed territory between Saudi Arabia and Yemen, which the Saudis now control. The territory generates terrorists against the Sauds as much or more than against the Iraqis or the US, as al-Qaeda exploits the dispute to amplify hatred against the Saudis. That fits perfectly into the plans of Osama bin Laden, who wants to see the Saudi royal family overthrown and a new caliphate put in its place -- headed by Osama.

Posted by: Procopius2k || 11/24/2007 10:39 Comments || Top||

#3  Aren't the Bin Ladins ethnic Yemenis as well?

Al
Posted by: Frozen Al || 11/24/2007 15:37 Comments || Top||

#4  Yup.
Posted by: lotp || 11/24/2007 15:41 Comments || Top||


China-Japan-Koreas
Admiral 'Perplexed' by Snub at Hong Kong
The top U.S. military commander in the Pacific said he's "perplexed and concerned" by China's last-minute decision to deny a U.S. aircraft carrier entry to Hong Kong for a previously scheduled port visit.
Don't be perplexed, Admiral. What they did was quite clear.
The USS Kitty Hawk and its escort ships were due to dock there for a four-day visit Wednesday until they were refused access. Hundreds of family members had flown to Hong Kong to spend Thanksgiving with their sailors.
Making this an especially clear message.
"It's hard to put any kind of positive spin on this," Adm. Timothy Keating told The Associated Press in a telephone interview Thursday while flying back to the U.S. after visiting troops in Iraq. "I'm perplexed and concerned."
It's the exact same as when some jerk at the bar intentionally bumps into you and makes you spill your beer on your shirt. That's the kind of slap this was.
China later reversed its decision and said the ships could enter on humanitarian grounds, but the notice came while the vessels were already on their way back to their home ports. The vessels chose not to turn around.
As it should have been. The Chinese constructed the situation the exact way they wanted it, and the only "out" left for us was to humiliatingly accept "humanitarian assistance" from them. This refusal and then reversal put the onus on us to save the day and be responsible for the sailors' families. This is the way the Chinese plan, it's devious and you have only the ways out that they leave for you.
Thousands of sailors aboard the Kitty Hawk and its carrier battle group marked the Thanksgiving holiday at sea.

Chinese warships visited U.S. naval bases in Pearl Harbor and San Diego last year, and the two navies have since held basic search-and-rescue exercises together.

Asked if the refusal to let the Kitty Hawk into Hong Kong would hurt the U.S.-China military relationship, Keating said: "We'll keep working it of course, but it is difficult for me to characterize this in a positive light."
Our response to this insult will be watched carefully. To ignore it would be a green light to proceed with larger ideas in the future.
The admiral said he would to talk to officials at the State Department and the Pentagon to determine how to respond.

Keating, who heads the U.S. Pacific Command from its Hawaii headquarters, said he was unaware of any reason for China's decision. "It's my understanding the Chinese just said 'no,'" he said.
Yup, that's what they do. One word, "no". I remember getting a 3 month visa instead of a 6 month visa, and I insisted there had been some mixup in the paperwork. The lady informed me I had a 3 month visa, and that was it. I asked why, and she replied, "mei you wei shen me", which in Chinese literally means "no why". No why...well, that explains the situation! Thanks, Chinese government person.
The 46-year-old USS Kitty Hawk is the only U.S. aircraft carrier permanently deployed abroad.
P.S. SHITTY KITTY SHITTY KITTY
Posted by: gromky || 11/24/2007 11:46 || Comments || Link || [5 views] Top|| File under:

#1  The admiral said he would to talk to officials at the State Department and the Pentagon to determine how to respond.

How about a low level formation of Hornets breaking the sound barrier over Victory Harbour? I wonder if he rings up the Pentagon before hitting the head.



Posted by: Besoeker || 11/24/2007 15:08 Comments || Top||

#2  I spent a few days aboard the "Shitty Kitty" off the coast of Vietnam in 1971, working with the Navy photo interpreters on a special project, so I kind of like the old tub. There was an article in today's local paper suggesting that one of the reasons for the Chinese behavior was President Bush's recent presentation to the Dahlai Lama of the US Freedom Medal.

The Kitty Hawk is the last, or one of the last, oil-fired carriers in the US Navy, and has been scheduled for decommissioning several times. We really ought to twist the dragon's tail by giving the ship to the Japanese, once the US decommissions it. I'm sure the Japanese will know how to use it effectively. We also need to either find or build a carrier battle group for Australia. They and the Japanese could team up to help us defend the Philippines and contain the islamonutz in Indonesia and Malaysia.
Posted by: Old Patriot || 11/24/2007 15:21 Comments || Top||

#3  Too bad the Kitty Hawk couldn't take all the families aboard and steam out of Hong Kong. I would not allow any Chicom military in the US any more. They take but they do not give. They need a message, too.
Posted by: Alaska Paul || 11/24/2007 15:34 Comments || Top||

#4  Give her to Taiwan, let them modernize her.
Posted by: OldSpook || 11/24/2007 15:36 Comments || Top||

#5  Good inline, gromky. We really need to jam a stick into China's spokes. I vote for an Olympics boycott. It would cost them billions of dollars in lost tourist revenue and represent an incontrovertible loss of face like few others in their history.
Posted by: Zenster || 11/24/2007 16:05 Comments || Top||

#6  OP__ considering who just took over the Oz gov't, I think I'd wait a bit on that xmas gift idea
Posted by: Elmoluting B. Hayes7559 || 11/24/2007 17:11 Comments || Top||

#7  The gift to Japan idea has great merit I think. More than anything, we must respond to this calculated insult with a carefully calculated smack in response. This was a jab, and it needs a jab back. These people see themselves as our enemy, and I think they are right. We need to re-industrialize America and stop buying their products which have funded the greatest military buildup, in recent history. Couple the wealth we are givinvg them with the technology they are stealing, the are leaping entire decades of development.
Posted by: NoMoreBS || 11/24/2007 18:50 Comments || Top||

#8  Dozens of Chinese ships visit US ports every day. Do American leaders have the courage to say 'NO"?
Posted by: ed || 11/24/2007 19:06 Comments || Top||

#9  My sister-in-law just noticed that an artificial Christmas tree she'd bought on sale was from China. Remembering all the recent stories about lead in children's toys, she decided to return it, just in case. The lady is about as apolitical as one can get, but still she made that choice this morning. It's going to be a very interesting shopping season.
Posted by: trailing wife || 11/24/2007 20:48 Comments || Top||

#10  I second OldSpook's idea.
Posted by: 3dc || 11/24/2007 21:28 Comments || Top||

#11  How about a low level formation of Hornets breaking the sound barrier over Victory Harbour? I wonder if he rings up the Pentagon before hitting the head.

I can assure you he'd be hearing from the Pentagon long before the sonic booms went away. Teling him his replacement will be there just as quickly.

Do me a favor - do what NCOs do best, ok?

Posted by: Pappy || 11/24/2007 23:08 Comments || Top||

#12  What do NCOs do best, Pappy?
Posted by: trailing wife || 11/24/2007 23:15 Comments || Top||

#13  Actually take OldSpook's idea a bit further and do the same thing the Russian did to China. Sell it to Taiwan for an amusement park.
Posted by: 3dc || 11/24/2007 23:53 Comments || Top||


Down Under
Howard Admits Election Defeat
Australian Prime Minister John Howard has suffered a humiliating election defeat as the opposition Labor Party swept into power.

Mr Howard, who was seeking a fifth term after 11 years of conservative rule, is reported to have telephoned Labor leader Kevin Rudd to admit defeat. The outgoing prime minister also appeared to be on course to lose his own seat, which he has held since 1974, as the elections saw a 6.3% swing to Labor. If he does lose his constituency, he will be the first prime minister since 1929 to do so. Former diplomat Mr Rudd, 50, presented himself as a new generation leader compared with the 68-year-old Mr Howard.

Voters warmed to his promise to pull Australian troops out of Iraq and sign the Kyoto Protocol on climate change. The pledges further isolate the United States, which had received strong backing from Mr Howard.

"On the numbers we've seen tonight, Labor is going to form a government," deputy Labor leader Julia Gillard told Australian television as results came in. The Labor victory marks only the sixth change of government in Australia since the Second World War. The election was fought mainly on domestic issues, with Labor exploiting widespread anger at workplace laws and rising interest rates. Mr Howard was Australia's second-longest serving prime minister behind Liberal Party founder Sir Robert Menzies.
Posted by: Dave D. || 11/24/2007 06:53 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Sad. Australia apparently wants to go the way of the British. Off the cliff into ruin.
Posted by: DarthVader || 11/24/2007 7:55 Comments || Top||

#2  The fallout from waging unwinnable wars, gave America: President Jimmy Carter. Howard had to defend his support for the interventions, in face of US admissions that this war - with unimpeded harborage and jihad support from Saudi Arabia, Iran, Pakistan and Syria - could go on for decades, couldn't promise peace.

Even with the Surge, the status quo is not sellable to any electorate. The sight of a brand new heroin industry flourishing in Helmand, Afghanistan, will disgust American taxpayers. I wonder who will say: vote for me and I will demolish them with napalm, and crumble any mosque from where jihad terror calls issue.
Posted by: McZoid || 11/24/2007 8:19 Comments || Top||

#3  Yes, and they kicked Churchill [not Ward] out after the victory over Hitler back in Britain too. So? It looks like the heavy work is being taken care of. Thanks for the assist mates.

The election was fought mainly on domestic issues, with Labor exploiting widespread anger at workplace laws and rising interest rates.

Just like Nancy and Reid ran against not enough corruption and then changed the tune after 1 January to their anti-war theme. Wait till the ozzies get enough of the transnational progressive agenda in the home to learn what the general voter has learned here.
Posted by: Procopius2k || 11/24/2007 8:34 Comments || Top||

#4  11 years is a long time. It's a great run and history will treat Howard well as he deserves.

Oz survived Keating and Hawke. It will survive this Mark Rudd, too.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble || 11/24/2007 8:49 Comments || Top||

#5  Thank you, Mr. Howard. You will be missed.
Posted by: Seafarious || 11/24/2007 9:07 Comments || Top||

#6  Oz survived Keating and Hawke. It will survive this Mark Rudd, too.

But with scratched ears. Who needs it? Do Ozzies really need to learn a lesson? At what cost?

To the consolation of concerned, Canucks are and now Frogs seem to be amongst gains. But then again, some Western Euro countries are already in the middle of a slippery slope and UK seems to be amongst them.
Posted by: twobyfour || 11/24/2007 11:10 Comments || Top||

#7  Are Aussie diplomats as traitorous as American ones? I hope not. The Aussies deserve better than that.
Posted by: Swamp Blondie || 11/24/2007 11:20 Comments || Top||

#8  Yes, and they kicked Churchill [not Ward] out after the victory over Hitler back in Britain too. So? It looks like the heavy work is being taken care of. Thanks for the assist mates.

Concur. So that would make Kevin Rudd Australia's Clement Atlee?
Posted by: mrp || 11/24/2007 11:50 Comments || Top||

#9  No big deal. Leaders and political fortunes always come and go. But the trouble here is Australia (which is country of similar immigrant origins as America) and the future of its own enterprise. This will be seen much along the lines of the Spain elections and wouldn't surprise me to see some internal Islam terrorist action as a response to what they perceive as internal political and cultural weakness.
Posted by: Jack is Back! || 11/24/2007 12:16 Comments || Top||

#10  Good luck Convicts. You may soon realize what you've lost.
Posted by: Besoeker || 11/24/2007 13:12 Comments || Top||

#11  America thanks John Howard for his unwavering dedication to naming the enemy aloud and bringing the battle to them in no uncertain terms. Something we are are barely capable of ourselves. I do not relish thinking of the terrorist attacks that a liberal Australian government will invite by their spineless kowtowing to Islam.
Posted by: Zenster || 11/24/2007 13:16 Comments || Top||

#12  China managed to get their guy elected.
Posted by: crosspatch || 11/24/2007 14:58 Comments || Top||

#13  Fascists again will arrive just off the shores of Britain (Germany's Hitler) and Australia (Japan's Hirohito) as Fascism did in WWII. History will repeat itself. All the Indonesian Islamofascists need is a leader to emerge to solidify the effort. All the European Islamites need is a leader to emerge as well to solidify their efforts in Europe.

When that happens, the US may or may not have the leadership in place to repel the now slowly emerging Global Caliphate.
Posted by: General Patton || 11/24/2007 14:59 Comments || Top||

#14  Oh and I like that comment about "further isolates the United States" which completely ignores what has been going on in Germany and France.
Posted by: crosspatch || 11/24/2007 14:59 Comments || Top||

#15  You may send an e-mail to PM Howard at this page
Posted by: Bobby || 11/24/2007 16:12 Comments || Top||

#16  Australia experts: how long until the next election?

Oh, and we're starting to de-Surge, so it's fair enough if Australia does, too. There doesn't seem to be any talk of leaving Afghanistan, or quitting the War on Terror, which for Australia means Malaysia and Indonesia, where they've been involved for years -- without any help from us that I recall. As for the Kyoto Protocol, almost all the signatories except Britain never intended -- nor have -- abided by it, as it was intended originally to hobble the U.S.. Should we honestly expect a Labour candidate to mean to abide by the thing, especially when President Bush has begun (foolishly, in my opinion, but perhaps there are deeper currents than I know) talking about it recently?
Posted by: trailing wife || 11/24/2007 21:17 Comments || Top||

#17  Iraq wasn't an issue in the election. Kyoto and global warming surprisingly were. Otherwise it was domestic issues with the perception it was time for a change.

Rudd doesn't concern me too much. Its the rest of the Red and Green crazies in the Labour party that will be the problem.

Also something of a red state/blue state divide here. My electorate in Perth actually swung to the Liberals and it looks like a Liberal win whereas in the last election Labour won although by a very slim margin.
Posted by: phil_b || 11/24/2007 22:02 Comments || Top||

#18  Australia is already well under its Kyoto target. So signing it, is just symbolic.
Posted by: phil_b || 11/24/2007 22:11 Comments || Top||


Oz election results
Available at the link as they come in. No results listed as of 0116 Rantburg Server Time.
Posted by: Seafarious || 11/24/2007 01:16 || Comments || Link || [4 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Exit polls say Labour will win comfortably.
Posted by: phil_b || 11/24/2007 1:58 Comments || Top||

#2  Damn. Very disappointing. I've no idea whether Labour is as clueless and morally imbecilic as their counterparts in other western countries - but I know Howard's folks got things very right on the big questions. Unlike their US ally, they also managed to state the case clearly and emphatically.
Posted by: Verlaine || 11/24/2007 2:20 Comments || Top||

#3  Sigh. Oz was one of the few nations that consistently got it right.
Posted by: Zenster || 11/24/2007 2:48 Comments || Top||

#4  gird yer loins boyz and fix bayonets we won't fail men if we fight like hell!
Posted by: Red Dawg || 11/24/2007 4:11 Comments || Top||

#5  I think it's over - a Labor victory. Personally, I would have preferred Kim Beazley to Kevin Rudd - I think he would have made a much better PM and was more deserving of the position.
Posted by: Gladys || 11/24/2007 5:08 Comments || Top||

#6  And in one years time people will be viewing this the same way they were in Spain after Zappy was elected: Stupid.
Posted by: Charles || 11/24/2007 7:39 Comments || Top||

#7  apparently ear wax now joins vegamite as a national dish
Posted by: Frank G || 11/24/2007 8:51 Comments || Top||

#8  I lol'd at Frank.
Posted by: Thomas Woof || 11/24/2007 10:11 Comments || Top||

#9  Personally, I would have preferred Kim Beazley to Kevin Rudd - I think he would have made a much better PM and was more deserving of the position.

Over at Damian Penny's someone was saying that the moonbat love for Rudd was ominous. I replied that it wasn't love for Rudd, but hate for Howard. It was the same with Mark Latham, who turned out to be a bit of a nutter. But poor old Beazley, who was a man of some sense, did not inspire the same pseudo-affection.

I always thought Prime Ministering did not suit Howard; he always looked as if his ulcers were gnawing at him. Perhaps even now he and Beazley are kicking back, laughing in their beers.
Posted by: Angie Schultz || 11/24/2007 15:26 Comments || Top||

#10  I'm over it. Commercial free election T.V is the most boring thing i have ever seen. Thank God they had Star Wars Movie on Channel 10, otherwise i would of went insane listening to all the political B.S. 6 Weeks of campaigning and watching them talk crap on t.v, thank god its over, thank god it's over. It doesn't matter who is Elected, all the Politicians tell lies.
Posted by: Chamble McGurque2977 || 11/24/2007 16:27 Comments || Top||

#11  over? Heck it's just beginning. You'll have to listen to years and years of analysis how they aren't really screwing you over, it just feels that way.
Posted by: Woozle Grereck5422 || 11/24/2007 17:25 Comments || Top||

#12  The media theme when conservatives are in power:

Underneath the happy surface lurks darkness and despair. Note their emphasis on family, religion, economy, stock market, improvements in Iraq - etc. Etc. Economy doing well - doom awaits!

The media theme when liberals are in power:

Sure, everything has gone to s&*t - but if you just wait long enough, it will be great fertilizer
Posted by: Woozle Grereck5422 || 11/24/2007 17:34 Comments || Top||


Fifth Column
Defense Focus: Spy sat lessons -- Part 3
Why is the U.S. defense industry sector having such difficulty with producing so many ambitious programs like the Littoral Combat Ship, the Space-Based Infrared System, and the Future Image Architecture program on budget and within reasonable time, compared with its triumphs of a generation ago? One major reason is that early triumphant programs were created by an earlier generation.

Read this article that vindicates what myself and other displaced workers have been saying in all fields! Let's say it. The out-sourcing, demands of venture caps and current management theory have been a Fifth Column to the United States!
[...]

One major problem almost never directly addressed is a process that has now been observed in the aerospace field for at least 35 years -- the loss of experienced veterans on a huge scale before they could pass on most of their experience and expertise to qualified successors. The shrinkage of the U.S. aerospace workforce to one-seventh of what it was a quarter-century ago when President Ronald Reagan took office has been the main general factor in this process. But it has been intensified and made far worse by the bias toward having academic qualifications for senior management in the industrial workplace and by the accompanying bias against having older managers in their 40s and 50s, or even in their 60s.
Posted by: 3dc || 11/24/2007 04:26 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Management where I work is in love with "process." (sick six-sigma, ISOwhatever, Configuration Management run by Himmler's acolytes, etc., etc.) Added cost is huge and the "benefit" is smart engineers bogged down in endless timewasting crap. Recently a viewgraph showed up with this inspiring message:

"Win the war on talent!"

They're definitely winning.
Posted by: PBMcL || 11/24/2007 11:46 Comments || Top||

#2  Its all Edward Demings fault.
Posted by: Jack is Back! || 11/24/2007 12:19 Comments || Top||

#3  The out-sourcing, demands of venture caps and current management theory have been a Fifth Column to the United States!

While, perhaps, not an actively antagonistic element working directly against America's security in the Global War on Terrorism: The self-protecting and entrenched Good Old Boy network of American CEOs have begun to represent opposition to our national economic health.

Considering that real-world experience no longer is an accepted yardstick and that a Harvard MBA has become the new gold standard for a boardroom chair, the endemic infection of our corporate world with elitist mentalities should be no surprise. Couple that with the lack of allegience shown by companies—whose original survival often depended upon American free market economics—that now migrate offshore if it boosts their bottom line by 0.0001% and the CEO network becomes a negative player in this industrial drama.

I have long railed about how America must retain a fundamental quorum of essential manufacturing capabilities. In the modern network-centric battlefield, simple DRAM data storage chips have become critical assets. Even such banal enterprises like textiles are needed to make military uniforms. In the name of increasing profits for the select cadres of lobbyist-equipped political campaign contributors, we have seen a huge number of these vital industries gutted and sent overseas.

The migration of important production expertise to a significant enemy like communist China—not to mention tremendous wealth in the form of our staggering trade imabalance—is a sterling example of the political appeasement enjoyed by faithless American multinationals. They are effectively being rewarded for trashing our economy.

One major problem almost never directly addressed is a process that has now been observed in the aerospace field for at least 35 years -- the loss of experienced veterans on a huge scale before they could pass on most of their experience and expertise to qualified successors.

It bears repeating what I have previously posted in other threads about CEO overcompensation as this article drives home the exact point I had made about how poor documentation devastatingly compounds the loss of skills brought on due to sleight-of-hand bookkeeping practices practiced by top executives—too often the aforementioned Harvard MBAs—who seek cosmetic turnarounds of corporations solely for the sake of prematurely awarded stock options and bonuses that have nothing to do with long term profitability or true corporate survival.
It remains a simple fact that an overwhelming number of companies have poor quality documentation. Too often it results from an attitude of; "Get the job done and worry about documentation later." This sort of shortsighted management is incredibly toxic to real productivity as it inhibits expedient streamlining of manufacturing processes. This in turn inhibits ROI (Return On Investment) based upon legitimate increases in productivity and decreased cost of manufacturing. It remains a simple fact that—in nearly every case—the cost of labor is a tiny fraction of overall expenses and even a significant reduction in workforce generates little to no actual increase in true profitability.

Lack of adequate documentation automatically engenders the growth of "tribal lore" amongst workers with respect to methodology and solutions. This knowledge usually concentrates in senior employees and is forever lost in the usual initial round of cost-cutting layoffs. While a CEO may appear to have reduced expenses—excepting his own, of course—in reality this attempt to weather economic downturns leaves companies completely crippled once the marketplace recovers. Bereft of seasoned talent, labor costs and operating losses soar due to poor outgoing quality, expensive rework to correct the mistakes of new-hires and NRE (Non-Recurring Engineering) costs related to recapturing the manufacturing knowledge lost by reductions in the experienced workforce.

As the article itself concludes:

The shrinkage of the U.S. aerospace workforce to one-seventh of what it was a quarter-century ago when President Ronald Reagan took office has been the main general factor in this process. But it has been intensified and made far worse by the bias toward having academic qualifications for senior management in the industrial workplace and by the accompanying bias against having older managers in their 40s and 50s, or even in their 60s.
Posted by: Zenster || 11/24/2007 13:08 Comments || Top||

#4  " But it has been intensified and made far worse by the bias toward having academic qualifications for senior management in the industrial workplace and by the accompanying bias against having older managers in their 40s and 50s, or even in their 60s."

Yeah, that's what I call the Google effect. Google won't hire anyone much over 30 because they think if you are that old then you are stupid or can't grasp new technologies. Tell that to the 50 year olds that are designing the microprocessors that their stuff runs on.

Also I sincerely believe that anyone under 30 in this country that has come through the public school system has no concept of problem solving. If they haven't been specifically taught something, they have no clue how to find the information on their own ... they are lost. That goes double when under pressure. We bring them up nowadays in sports where we don't keep score because we don't want them to be traumatized by losing and thrust them into a world where competition is everything and wonder why they are failing.
Posted by: crosspatch || 11/24/2007 13:34 Comments || Top||

#5  Zenster from my point of view its faily simple:

I am a well experienced intelligence worker who is a lot closer to retirement than 40, who also has a experience in satellite and aerospace systems, in addition to my experience designing and supporting SF operations and planning systems, C3I systems, and military service in the Army.

Yet I and a lot of others like me have been discarded by managers who want younger programmers and engineers who cost less, or younger MBA types who thing that someone over 40 cannot do as well as someone right out of college with the newer things like C# or Java.

So we end up being let go when there is a funding slump, and have a hard time getting back in. Same goes with the good technical managers -instead of givne new projects and programs, they wre moved outof the way for somone cheaper.

So good luck getting those engineers from India to fill security positions, and good luck getting these green engineers and PM's to produce systems that we did.

And if you want the younger guys, they will continue to make mistakes because they haven;t seen thigns before that we have, and cannot design for them like we do. They'll have to do it without having the apprentice time in the 80's from those steel-grey crew-cut guys who invented all this in the 50's and 60's.

Thats why still using 20+ year old tech (Stealth was a 70's 80's product) and some satellites that are 10+ years old and newer ones have failed, and why little of the stuff since 2000 has delivered like the stuff we did the 80's thru early 90's. We did it with the overlap from those great seat-of-the-pants engineers. The ones now dont have that overlap because of the MBA and cultural belief that younger is better. Bull.

So we've left aerospace. You can only shit on us for so long before we cannot be lured back.


Posted by: OldSpook || 11/24/2007 13:44 Comments || Top||

#6  Mr. Lotp's career was in defense aerospace for a couple decades (both in and out of uniform) and I worked development and then engineering management on several space-based defense projects.

The article misses a key factor -- the move in the 90s under Clinton to use low bid as the primary contracting criterion and to push off the shelf components whenever any sort of half case could be made for doing so (usually on cost ).

Add in the wooing of China under Clinton and you can see where that's going ....

FIA had the added problem of massive fingers in the pie on the part of Congressional staff. Knowing zilch about both intel/military issues and technology, they insisted on pushing multiple edges at once while promising everything to everyone. NRO went along in part as an attempt to hold onto their mission as the Clinton machine hollowed out and reorg'd intel collection up one side and down the other.

I'd be very interested to know just where those defective components were manufactured.
Posted by: lotp || 11/24/2007 13:47 Comments || Top||

#7  The out-sourcing, demands of venture caps and current management theory have been a Fifth Column to the United States!

Agree. I think the whole concept of contracting is going to have very negative repercussions for the long run. I feel sorry for the educated just entering the workplace today. Though they are better paid, they are not much better off than migrant farm workers - moving from place to place providing services without any stake in the company or the final product. Punch the clock, fill your 401K and keep your head low so you don't get the first pink slip.

Don't know what will fix this. The mega corps that get the contracts have no reason not to continue to win the contract with the biggest promises and the lowest bid. It's not like the ol' days when your company needed to worry about quality work and reputation. Now, you get the contract, hire the cheapest workers, do the least amount possible to complete the contract, fire them all so you don't have to pay seniority and then start the process all over again.

This is what happens when you just hand over your tax dollars to your government to distribute to whomever and whatever it pleases. No one knows or cares how it is distributed and then you, the taxpayer end up begging the same people that you gave it to for a little bit of it back for healthcare and for a contracting job that you can get paid 1/2 of what it is worth.
Posted by: Woozle Grereck5422 || 11/24/2007 13:53 Comments || Top||

#8  "I'd be very interested to know just where those defective components were manufactured."

That thought crossed my mind as well.
Posted by: crosspatch || 11/24/2007 13:55 Comments || Top||

#9  Look no further than some porker congressmen's districts. Seriously. Look at the spending and what companies in which distrcits got the slice of the pie for that. I dont want to say much more because I am unsure where the line is, but someone that wants to dig this out will find all kinds of roaches under the rocks, getting rich while operations in the IC and DoD go wanting.
Posted by: OldSpook || 11/24/2007 15:01 Comments || Top||

#10  Thats why still using 20+ year old tech (Stealth was a 70's 80's product) and some satellites that are 10+ years old and newer ones have failed, and why little of the stuff since 2000 has delivered like the stuff we did the 80's thru early 90's. We did it with the overlap from those great seat-of-the-pants engineers. The ones now dont have that overlap because of the MBA and cultural belief that younger is better. Bull

'Spook, I can think of no better example than the Sidewinder missile. I seem to recall it was brought in ahead of deadline and under budget and still remains in service to this very day. This was your classic rugged KISS (Keep It Simple Stupid) style of engineering. I doubt we will ever see the likes of it again until machine intelligence begins generating designs for us.
Posted by: Zenster || 11/24/2007 15:59 Comments || Top||


India-Pakistan
Sharif to return to Pakistain on Sunday
Nawaz Sharif, the prime minister deposed by President Pervez Musharraf in a coup eight years ago, will return to Pakistan from Saudi Arabia on Sunday, his brother Shahbaz Sharif told a Pakistani news channel.

General Musharraf, under intense criticism at home and abroad for imposing emergency rule three weeks ago, agreed to Sharif's return in discussions with Saudi King Abdullah in Riyadh this week, according to a leader of the ruling Pakistan Muslim League (PML).

Sharif met King Abdullah in Riyadh for a "farewell meeting" on Friday.

"We will fly on Sunday on Saudi Airlines directly from Medina to Lahore," Shahbaz, speaking from London, told the private television channel ARYOne World. Sharif will be joined by his wife Kulsoom and Shahbaz in Saudi and they will perform a pilgrimage to Mecca before taking the flight to Lahore, the capital of Punjab province and power base of the Sharif family.
Posted by: Fred || 11/24/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [4 views] Top|| File under: Govt of Pakistan

#1  wonder if he plans to rock the casbah?
Posted by: Abu do you love || 11/24/2007 15:26 Comments || Top||


Pakistan decries its suspension from Commonwealth
Pakistan denounced its suspension from the Commonwealth Friday, a day after the 53-nation group of former British colonies announced its decision, reprimanding Pakistan's President Pervez Musharraf for his declaration of emergency martial law. Deutsche Presse-Agentur reports that Islamabad "called the Commonwealth's decision to suspend Pakistan's membership "unreasonable and unjustified."

"The decision does not take into account the objective conditions prevailing in Pakistan," the Foreign Ministry in Islamabad said in a statement. "The emergency was a necessary measure to avert a serious internal crisis which is being addressed and the situation is now returning towards normalcy," it added.
Posted by: Fred || 11/24/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under: Govt of Pakistan


Israel-Palestine-Jordan
Paleos Drop Support for Hamas Thugs
Posted by: McZoid || 11/24/2007 09:13 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  In unrelated news, Paleos increase support for Fatah thugs.
Posted by: DMFD || 11/24/2007 16:14 Comments || Top||

#2  DMFD, you stole my intended punchline!
Posted by: twobyfour || 11/24/2007 22:03 Comments || Top||


US must pressure Israel for peace, say Paleostinians
(AKI) - The US must use the Middle East peace summit to put more pressure on Israel to ensure any kind of lasting peace, according to Palestinian officials.
"But don't go puttin' no pressure on us! We got enough pressure!"
Speaking on the eve of the US-sponsored summit in the city of Annapolis next week, several senior officials expressed concern that little would arise from the global talks. "We thought that the Annapolis peace conference would be a kind of gift to the president of the Palestinian National Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, and the Fatah movement," a Palestinian spokesman told Adnkronos International (AKI), on condition of anonymity. "But in reality, at this point, the state of things is not encouraging. We hope the US will put pressure on Israel and limit the eventual damage, that could be exploited by Hamas to firm its support. Israel does not want peace."
Ddidn't get everything you wanted handed to you on a silver platter, huh?
Fatah spokesman Samir Nayfa said the Annapolis conference is "in the interests of the Americans, the Palestinians and the Israelis and each of the parties will commit to gaining the best possible results". According to Nayfa: "Although the results seem unclear right now, our presence at Annapolis is in the interests of the Palestinians."
But...
But Moustafa Barghouti, deputy Palestinian leader from the progressive Mubadara Party, attacked Israel on the eve of the summit, saying Jerusalem was responsible for a "humanitarian crisis" in Gaza and "nothing will change" after Annapolis. In a telephone interview with Adnkronos International (AKI) from Ramallah, Barghouti said Israel was not " a real partner for peace" and was " confusing the international community, by advancing initiatives about which it was not serious." Barghouti said the Palestinians wanted the release of 432 Palestinian prisoners and could not discuss the creation of an independent Palestinian state while the Israeli occupation of Gaza continued.
"They just released 400 and some prisoners!"
"Those ain't the 400 and some we're talking about!"
"They're not occupying Gaza anymore, either!"
"They say they're not!"
On his party's website, Barghouti said Israeli violations of human rights in Gaza were being ignored and he cited a list of what he alleged were recent Israeli attacks and injuries on Palestinians. In addition he claimed ten Gaza patients had died recently as a direct result of Israeli roadblocks.
This article starring:
Palestine Liberation Organization
Moustafa Barghouti
Samir Nayfa
Posted by: Fred || 11/24/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [3 views] Top|| File under: Palestinian Authority

#1  Why?
Posted by: 3dc || 11/24/2007 4:07 Comments || Top||

#2  and could not discuss the creation of an independent Palestinian state while the Israeli occupation of Gaza continued

I know I'm very naive, and I'm not in the shoes of the israelis, obviously, especially the "statemen types", but in the face of such bad faith... why bother to imagine ever making peace with people who don't want peace, or define it as wiping your Nation of the map and reverting to the islamic natural order of lording over you?
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 11/24/2007 15:50 Comments || Top||

#3  It's always "put pressure on Israel". It's never "we'll stop killing Israelis". Olmert is making a big mistake, and several cabinet members have told him so. Nothing good will come from the session.
Posted by: Old Patriot || 11/24/2007 18:21 Comments || Top||


Peace pact impossible without Hamas, says expert
(AKI) - There will be no prospect of peace in the Middle East without the involvement of the Palestinian group Hamas, an international expert has warned. On the eve of Tuesday's US-sponsored summit in Annapolis, Saudi Arabia confirmed that it would attend the talks, while Hamas, which has not been invited, dismissed the conference as a failure.

But Robert Lowe, Middle East expert from the London-based think-tank, Chatham House, told Adnkronos International (AKI) that without Hamas' involvement there would be no progress. "There's a huge stumbling block, it is just not logical to pursue negotiations with only half the Palestinians," said Lowe. "It's hard to see how Annapolis can go very far. Fatah themselves are divided, there is a huge problem of legitimacy and representation. It's not only the Palestinians who cannot present a united front. The Israeli government is also fragile. Who knows when the next election will be?"

While Lowe recognised that it was a good sign that the sides are talking, he also said Israel's restrictions on food and medical supplies to Gaza was making peace a dim prospect and fuelling potential violence.

The Heritage Foundation, a conservative Washington think-tank, also said neither Abbas nor Olmert had enough domestic political support to fulfill any kind of agreement. In a paper entitled "The Annapolis Peace Conference: Cloudy Prospects for Success", expert James Phillips attacked the Palestinians for failing to recognise the legitimacy of the Jewish state in its previous negotiations.

But he attacked Hamas saying it was the greatest obstacle to peace. "Hamas, which continues to rain rockets down on Israeli civilians living near the border with Gaza, is in a position to explode the chances for a genuine peace," Phillips said. "Backed by Iran and Syria, it is fortifying its Gaza stronghold and preparing for war, bolstered by tons of weapons smuggled across the border with Egypt. Sooner or later Israel will be compelled to defend itself by invading Gaza, which will further cloud the prospects of peace. But as long as Hamas retains its stranglehold over Gaza, no stable peace is possible."

The Washington Institute for Near East Policy has accused Hamas of using Annapolis to delegitimise the Palestinian Liberation Organization, of which Fatah comprises the largest faction. "The push for diplomatic progress at Annapolis has already exacerbated the confrontation between Fatah and Hamas, " said Mohammad Yaghi, in a policy paper released by the institute. "Diplomatic prospects have raised the stakes of the debate over who has the political legitimacy to negotiate with Israel."
This article starring:
Palestinian Liberation Organization
expert James Phillips
Mohammad Yaghi
Robert Lowe, Middle East expert
The Heritage Foundation
The Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Posted by: Fred || 11/24/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under: Hamas

#1  You know I've head that water is wet too. But you better get one of these so-called 'experts' to confirm it.

Peace is impossible with or without Hamas.
Posted by: CrazyFool || 11/24/2007 0:15 Comments || Top||

#2  Peace pact impossible with Hamas
Posted by: Ulomoque Protector of the Hatfields2940 || 11/24/2007 0:28 Comments || Top||

#3  Admit I haven't been following things closely, but I can't imagine Olmert could get anything substantial (i.e., risky) past other Israelis. Aside from this, let us try to imagine the credibility of any conceivable Palestinian commitments, given their entire history and esp. the history of the Oslo fiasco.
Posted by: Verlaine || 11/24/2007 2:31 Comments || Top||

#4  All that Hamas can offer is the peace of the grave. Preferrably theirs.
Posted by: Zenster || 11/24/2007 3:09 Comments || Top||

#5  Peace isn't possible, no matter how many times the Palis are hit with a clue bat....Hamas or no Hamas.
Posted by: Swamp Blondie || 11/24/2007 11:23 Comments || Top||


Arab Leaders 'Optimistic' Over ME Talks
Egyptian, Jordanian and Palestinian leaders said yesterday they were optimistic about the outcome of a US-sponsored peace conference as Arab foreign ministers mulled whether to join the conference.

Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak wound up a three-day meeting with Jordan’s King Abdallah and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in the Egyptian resort of Sharm El-Sheikh amid a rush of diplomatic activity ahead of the talks in Annapolis, outside Washington on Nov. 27.

The talks came as Arab League foreign ministers were to hold talks on whether to join the Annapolis meeting, amid skepticism from many Arab nations that anything concrete would emerge from it.

In Sharm, the three leaders agreed that “this meeting opens the way for much optimism in that it could fulfill the ambitions of the Palestinian and Arab people and all those interested in the Palestinian question and the peace process,” Egyptian presidential spokesman Suleiman Awad told reporters.

The letter of invitation to the conference “contains some reference points for peace including the Arab peace initiative and the principle of land for peace,” Awad said.

During a visit to Egypt on Tuesday, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said he hoped to reach a peace deal with the Palestinians in 2008. But there are differences between the Israelis and Palestinians over a joint document to be presented at the conference — even over what the statement should be called.

Posted by: Fred || 11/24/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under: Palestinian Authority

#1  "Every one of us is getting a pony!"
Posted by: Zenster || 11/24/2007 13:31 Comments || Top||

#2  Translation: the Joooooosss are going to make more concessions for nothing.
Posted by: DMFD || 11/24/2007 16:17 Comments || Top||


Barak: 'High chance' summit will succeed
Syrian participation at the Annapolis peace summit next week would be a positive step that could "open the door" for full-fledged peace negotiations between Syria and Israel, Defense Minister Ehud Barak told The Jerusalem Post on Thursday. "I hope that Syria and Saudi Arabia come to the summit," Barak said in an interview with the Post ahead of his trip to the US Saturday night to attend next week's Middle East summit at the Annapolis Naval Academy.

While the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was the "key issue" on the summit's agenda, Barak said "it will be good for Israel" if Syria participates. Barak is scheduled to meet with US Defense Secretary Robert Gates on Tuesday to discuss regional security issues. Barak was in Washington in October for talks with Gates and US defense chiefs.
Posted by: Fred || 11/24/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under: Palestinian Authority

#1  I have a different idea about negotiations with Syria.
Posted by: twobyfour || 11/24/2007 11:25 Comments || Top||

#2  Barak is a good military man, but politics is simply not his calling.
Posted by: twobyfour || 11/24/2007 11:27 Comments || Top||

#3  Israel needs to understand how after decades of demonstrating ample good faith in the peace process, it is no longer required of them. The ball is permanently in the Palestinians' court and need not be moved an inch by anyone else.

Israel should now be examining measures that involve "diplomacy by other means".
Posted by: Zenster || 11/24/2007 13:37 Comments || Top||


Mass protest against Annapolis conference held in Gaza
Gaza's terrorist groups, including the strip's Islamic rulers, Hamas, rallied tens of thousands of their supporters Friday in public protest against the forthcoming US-sponsored Mideast meeting, saying no such negotiations can deliver Palestinian rights.

Demonstrators in the southern city of Khan Younis marched following Friday prayers chanting "Death to Israel" and waving banners reading: "Bush is a war criminal not a peacemaker."
Demonstrators in the southern city of Khan Younis marched following Friday prayers chanting "Death to Israel" and waving banners reading: "(US President George W.) Bush is a war criminal not a peacemaker."

Hamas leaders told demonstrators Friday that over the next few days they will hold rallies and public events against the conference, culminating in a Gaza City public meeting to coincide with the Annapolis parley. In the north Gaza town of Jabaliya, about two thousand Islamic Jihad activists and supporters took to the streets in protest at Arab participation in the Maryland meeting.
Posted by: Fred || 11/24/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under: Hamas


Arab League chief: Israel won't get 'normalization for free'
Arab League Secretary General Amr Moussa said early on Friday that Arab countries will not offer Israel "normalization for free" during the upcoming US-sponsored Mideast peace conference.

Moussa's remarks were made shortly after midnight at the end of an informal gathering of some 11 Arab foreign ministers at the Arab League headquarters in Cairo ahead of a key league meeting to hammer out a unified Arab position on the conference. "There is nothing called a normalization for free," Moussa told reporters at the end of the meeting. "Arabs are going to participate in the (Annapolis) meeting, to show support for the Palestinians, based on the Arab peace initiative," he added.
Posted by: Fred || 11/24/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [4 views] Top|| File under: Global Jihad

#1  What-a Thug!
Posted by: 3dc || 11/24/2007 4:09 Comments || Top||

#2  "It's gonna take a whole messa ponies!"
Posted by: Zenster || 11/24/2007 13:20 Comments || Top||

#3  Can we stop this fucking parade already?
Posted by: danking70 || 11/24/2007 18:31 Comments || Top||


Southeast Asia
Malaysia arrests activists - Hindu activists
Three Hindu activists in Malaysia have been charged with sedition over plans to stage a rally in the capital to air the grievances of ethnic Indians. They are seeking reparations from the UK for bringing Indians to Malaysia as indentured labourers a century ago. The activists also demand measures to improve the living standards of Hindus.

But the government has banned the event, saying it could inflame racial tensions. It warned that anyone trying to take part would be arrested.

The three detained on Friday include the chairman of the Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf), Waytha Moorthy Ponnusamy, and two of his associates. Hindraf hopes to hold a demonstration outside the British High Commission in Kuala Lumpur on Sunday.

The three men were later charged with making seditious comments - and could face up to three years in jail if convicted. The government has set up a security cordon around Kuala Lumpur, and banned the rally citing possible violence. Malaysia bans public meetings of more than five people without a police permit.

Ethnic Indians - mainly Hindus - form one of Malaysia's largest minority groups. Activists say that many Hindus live in poverty, partly because of policies granting jobs and economic advantages to the ethnic Malay Muslim majority. The government has rejected claims of unfair discrimination.
Posted by: Seafarious || 11/24/2007 00:45 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under: Global Jihad

#1  They are seeking reparations from the UK for bringing Indians to Malaysia as indentured labourers a century ago.

This is pretty nutty. Based on CIA factbook numbers, the average Malaysian is way better off than the average Indian. And there's nothing preventing these people from returning to India.
Posted by: Zhang Fei || 11/24/2007 19:05 Comments || Top||


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Lebanon PM rejects Lahoud' declaration of 'state of emergency'
Posted by: Fred || 11/24/2007 08:26 || Comments || Link || [5 views] Top|| File under: Govt of Syria


Liverlips gone; Leb vote postponed till 30 November
(AKI) - Lebanese parliamentary speaker Nabih Berri said on Friday that the parliamentary vote for the next president has been postponed till 30 November after Lebanese MPs failed to convene to elect the new president on Friday. The pro-Syrian opposition boycotted the parliamentary session denying the 128-seat chamber the two-thirds quorum needed to carry out the vote.

The term of the incumbent pro-Syrian president, Emile Lahoud, expired at midnight on Friday. Repeated attempts to elect the president over the past two months have failed with the Hezbollah-led opposition and the Western-backed governing coalition failing to agree on a candidate.

Reports say that the the situation in Lebanon is tense with the army deployed in full force and schools closed. According to the Lebanese constitution, if no candidate is elected before Lahoud's mandate expires, his powers are automatically transferred to the anti-Syrian government of Prime Minister Fouad Siniora. However, Lahoud named army chief General Michel Suleiman as his provisional successor instead.
This article starring:
Emile Lahoud
Fouad Siniora
General Michel Suleiman
Nabih Berri
Posted by: Fred || 11/24/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [4 views] Top|| File under: Govt of Syria


Jury Is Still Out on Iran, Says Baradei
The UN’s atomic energy watchdog said yesterday it was still unable to confirm that Iran’s nuclear drive was entirely peaceful, despite increased cooperation from Tehran in a number of key areas. Iran, for its part, insisted that it was cooperating fully with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and any talk of possible further UN sanctions would be counterproductive.

The IAEA was “unable to provide credible assurance about the absence of undeclared nuclear material and activities,” agency chief Mohamed El-Baradei told the body’s 35-member board at the start of its regular year-end meeting. “This is especially crucial in the case of Iran, because of its history of undeclared activities, and the corresponding need to restore confidence in the peaceful nature of Iran’s nuclear program,” El-Baradei said.

Nevertheless, the IAEA “has no concrete information about possible undeclared nuclear material or weaponization activities in Iran,” El-Baradei insisted.

And he urged Tehran “to be more pro-active in providing information... in order for the IAEA to be able to clarify all major remaining issues by the end of the year.”

The Iran nuclear dossier was the dominant topic at the IAEA board meeting. And the focus was El-Baradei’s latest report on Iran, in which the IAEA chief had declared the jury is still out on the nature of Iran’s nuclear activities, despite coming clean on a number of key past questions.

Crucially, Iran was continuing to defy repeated UN demands that it suspend uranium enrichment, a key phase in the nuclear fuel cycle. Indeed, the fact that it is continuing to expand such activities had only reinforced the West’s belief that Tehran is seeking to develop the nuclear bomb, despite’s Iran’s protestations.

Iran’s UN envoy Ali-Asghar Soltanieh insisted that Tehran had provided “all the information” the IAEA had requested and also allowed access to all the necessary sites. “We have provided all the information and the agency has been visiting all workshops producing centrifuge machines, every piece of it,” Soltanieh told reporters, referring to the centrifuges that are used to enrich uranium.

“We’ll continue this mood of cooperation,” the Iranian ambassador said, but warned that the “constructive approach” would be jeopardized by possible UN sanctions.
Posted by: Fred || 11/24/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [5 views] Top|| File under: Govt of Iran

#1  Tits on a boar are less ornamental than this sack of shit.
Posted by: Zenster || 11/24/2007 1:53 Comments || Top||


Iran rejects UN sanctions as invalid
Iran on Friday called UN sanctions invalid and warned its enemies to expect a tidal wave of resistance if they increase pressure on Teheran to freeze uranium enrichment. The comments from Teheran and Vienna, at the end of a two-day meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency's 35 nation board in the Austrian capital, reflected the chasm between the views of Iran and the West on what Teheran has to do to escape further UN punishment.

Ali Asghar Soltanieh, the chief Iranian delegate to the International Atomic Energy Agency, said Security Council resolutions demanding a stop to enrichment have "no legal basis." And he accused Washington of making a political issue of what he maintained was a program only meant to produce electricity by falsely warning of the "threat of Iran's plutonium nuclear weapon. Allegations ... (of) Iran's clandestine and non-peaceful activities are now proved to be baseless."
Posted by: Fred || 11/24/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [5 views] Top|| File under: Govt of Iran


Revolutionary Guards chief: Iran will launch tsunamis against enemies
The chief of Iran's elite Revolutionary Guards on Friday warned that if the nation's enemies continued plotting against it, they would launch a tidal wave of resistance.
"We'll murderlize 'em! Hrowf! Hrowf!"
Gen. Mohammed Ali Jafari spoke on the anniversary of the founding of the Basij paramilitary force and during a particularly tense period of relations between Iran and the West, largely due to the Islamic Republic's nuclear program. "The ocean of the Iranian nation may sometimes look calm but if it becomes stormy it will create tsunamis," he told worshippers before a Friday prayer ceremony on the Teheran University campus.
This article starring:
Mohammed Ali JafariIRGC
Posted by: Fred || 11/24/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [4 views] Top|| File under: IRGC

#1  Frankly, with dollar deflation and the spectacle of jihad support issuing from our nominal GWOT allies - Pakistan and Saudi Arabia - intervention appears unlikely. Unthinkable but unlikely.

Looks like our grandchildren will face down Ayatollah ICBMs because we overspent nation builidng in places where nation destruction was a better option.
Posted by: McZoid || 11/24/2007 8:25 Comments || Top||

#2  Looks like our grandchildren will face down Ayatollah ICBMs because we overspent nation builidng in places where nation destruction was a better option.

An expert in both hindsight and the future- Yowzers!
Posted by: Pappy || 11/24/2007 11:05 Comments || Top||

#3  Looks like our grandchildren will face down Ayatollah ICBMs because we overspent nation builidng in places where nation destruction was a better option.

not sure from iran though...iran will not be nation building
Posted by: dan || 11/24/2007 13:03 Comments || Top||

#4  Come in waves, die in waves.
Posted by: OldSpook || 11/24/2007 15:25 Comments || Top||

#5  Won't take that long, MZ.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru || 11/24/2007 15:46 Comments || Top||

#6  McZoid, it was not. The dividend of Iraq is not apparent, but it will be in he future. It was the right call at the right time.

Iran s different story. We simply can't shift the burden on our children/granchildren. Not sure how, but we have to deal with it... where there's will, there's way.
Posted by: twobyfour || 11/24/2007 15:49 Comments || Top||

#7  The dividend of Iraq is not apparent, but it will be in he future. It was the right call at the right time.

Even if that "dividend" never materializes, invading Iraq was—as David D. has noted—something we hade to do so that we could at least tell our children and grandchildren, "We tried." Much more nastiness awaits the MME (Muslim Middle East). The vast majority of it they will have brought upon themselves. The catastrophic disassembly of Iran's nuclear R&D effort is but a small foretaste of what awaits the entire region.
Posted by: Zenster || 11/24/2007 16:11 Comments || Top||



Who's in the News
36[untagged]
5Global Jihad
4Taliban
3Govt of Syria
3Hamas
3Palestinian Authority
2Govt of Iran
2Govt of Pakistan
1Abu Sayyaf
1Hezbollah
1HUJI
1IRGC
1Islamic Jihad
1Lashkar e-Taiba
1Thai Insurgency
1al-Qaeda in North Africa
1al-Qaeda in Iraq
1Chechen Republic of Ichkeria
1al-Qaeda

Bookmark
E-Mail Me

The Classics
The O Club
Rantburg Store
The Bloids
The Never-ending Story
Thugburg
Gulf War I
The Way We Were
Bio

Merry-Go-Blog











On Sale now!


A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.

Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.

Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has dominated Mexico for six years.
Click here for more information

Meet the Mods
In no particular order...
Steve White
Seafarious
tu3031
badanov
sherry
ryuge
GolfBravoUSMC
Bright Pebbles
trailing wife
Gloria
Fred
Besoeker
Glenmore
Frank G
3dc
Skidmark

Two weeks of WOT
Sat 2007-11-24
  Tanks deployed in Beirut to prevent possible violence
Fri 2007-11-23
  Lahoud stepping down at midnight
Thu 2007-11-22
  Iraqi Security Forces detain 81 suspected extremists
Wed 2007-11-21
  Berri postpones Lebanon presidential vote for fourth time
Tue 2007-11-20
  Israel to free 441 Palestinian prisoners
Mon 2007-11-19
  Israel agrees to return 20,000 Palestinian refugees
Sun 2007-11-18
  Negroponte meets with Perv
Sat 2007-11-17
  40 militants killed as gunships pound Swat and Shangla
Fri 2007-11-16
  Philippines reaches deal with MILF
Thu 2007-11-15
  Morticia Hopes to Form Nat'l Unity Gov't
Wed 2007-11-14
  TNSM spreads outside Swat
Tue 2007-11-13
  Blasts rips through Philippines Congress building
Mon 2007-11-12
  Seven dead at festivities honoring Yasser
Sun 2007-11-11
  Thousands flee Mogadishu, over 80 killed
Sat 2007-11-10
  Sheikh al-Ubaidi, four others from Salvation Council in Diyala killed by suicide boomer


Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
3.149.229.253
Help keep the Burg running! Paypal:
WoT Operations (24)    Non-WoT (14)    Opinion (5)    Local News (5)    (0)