[LifeSiteNews] Professor Giuseppe Tritto, an internationally known expert in biotechnology and nanotechnology, says that the China Virus definitely wasn’t a freak of nature that happened to cross the species barrier from bat to man.
It will not be possible for the Dr. Fauci’s of the world to dismiss Professor Giuseppe Tritto as a crank. Not only is he an internationally known expert in biotechnology and nanotechnology who has had a stellar academic career, but he is also the president of the World Academy of Biomedical Sciences and Technologies (WABT), an institution founded under the aegis of UNESCO in 1997.
In other words, he is a man of considerable stature in the global scientific community. Equally important, one of the goals of WABT is to analyze the effect of biotechnologies—like genetic engineering—on humanity.
Continued on Page 49
#3
Not unreasonable to speculate that the CCP has a vaccine, had this vaccine and had inoculated key members before the virus was released.
When I speculate that the virus was deliberately and maliciously released with collusion from Democrats to wreck our economy and thereby diminish Trump's chances for re-election, some people talk about my tin foil hat. My response has always been that, of course I have no proof, but I would not put it past them. No one can deny that the timing would be just right for that. Considering their Russian collusion hoax, the Ukraine impeachment and Christine Blasey Ford, I believe I have probable cause for suspicion.
Posted by: Abu Uluque ||
08/21/2020 12:59 Comments ||
Top||
#4
The Dems are loving this, sick as they are, but the Europeans, the Aussies, Kiwis, central banks, and the Greta/al-Gore tree huggers are loving this too. Oh, and Bill.
#10
In the extreme, if the tree huggers get their way and put the kibosh on fossil fuels, it's going be back to mules and plows tilling the fields. This egesta is nutso.
The Digital Freedom Platform by London Real exclusively livestreamed what might be the most important documentary you will ever see: PLANDEMIC — INDOCTORNATION.
Created by the team behind the game-changing Plandemic video segment from Mikki Willis featuring Dr. Judy Mikovits that went viral and was banned on every major social media platform for exposing the truth about Covid-19, this new FEATURE LENGTH PIECE which is the most revelatory film on what is driving the vaccine agenda, the various roles of the WHO, Bill Gates, Tedros Adhanom, Anthony Fauci and more.
Going deep into what is really happening with mainstream media, Silicon Valley tech giants, big pharma and our health protection agencies, Mikki’s new film finally connects the dots...
... And we are excited to be able to share this with you...
We believe that this film will fundamentally shift the discourse around Coronavirus, the lockdown and the vested interests involved.
[AmericanSpectator] Ibrahim Boubacar Keita, president of the West African nation Mali since 2013, reportedly was tossed yesterday by elements of his country’s U.S.-trained army.
Our Africa Command (AFRICOM), American boots and strategic minds in Africa, has sought to engage the bad guys in small operations, while training African militaries in doing the job themselves. Mali has been a case study in the limitations of this approach.
The key issue from the American point of view is whether this latest West African coup, if it succeeds, will facilitate or hamper the continuing banditry in Africa’s vast Sahel. Successive U.S. administrations since Bill Clinton ...former Democratic president of the U.S. Bill was the second U.S. president to be impeached, the first to deny that oral sex was sex, the first to have difficulty with the definition of the word is... ’s have insisted it matters to our overall security, as well as the continent’s.
Continued on Page 49
[FFF] President Trump is saying that he might issue a pardon to Edward Snowden. For some reason, he hasn’t said the same thing about Julian Assange.
Mr. Snowden was a Russian spy. Mr. Assange happily published the intelligence thievings of a Russian spy. As a result lots of sources were murdered. And Mr. Assange has published the intelligence thievings of a great many others, resulting in more ruined lives and murders.
But a pardon suggests that the person being pardoned has done something wrong. Neither Snowden and Assange has done anything wrong — at least not in a moral sense.
Unmitigated bullshit.
It is the U.S. government — and specifically the national-security state branch of the federal government — that has engaged in terrible wrongdoing — wrongdoing that Snowden and Assange revealed to the American people and the people of the world.
Therefore, the real question is: Should Snowden and Assange pardon the U.S. for having destroyed a large part of their lives and liberty?
Neither man has been horribly murdered, so they’re doing better than most captured spies. They really have nothing to complain about.
Oh, sure, the two of them technically violated the federal government’s national-security laws, rules, and regulations against revealing the dark-side, sordid policies and practices of the national-security establishment. Big deal. Those laws, rules, and regulations are illegitimate, at least in a moral sense. Why should the dark-side, sordid policies and practices of a government be immune from disclosure?
Clearly the writer hasn't heard Winston Churchill’s dictum on truth.
#1
Maybe I missed something, but 1) the premise of the article's incredibly stupid and 2) Assange is Australian - I'm pretty sure Trump can't pardon a non-US citizen.
#4
#3: Embarrassing the state is the worst crime ever. You can't do anything worse than embarrass the state, never mind how illegal their actions. So just shaddup, you little nothing person, and follow the orders of your betters and don't embarrass them. /Sarc
#6
Y’all have forgotten all the local employees and confidential informants in Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere whose names and information were leaked along with the embarrassing stuff. And how many of them were murdered as a result, and how afterward others would not come forward because we had been proved untrustworthy.
It would have been easy for Mr. Assange’s team to strip that information out of what was released, but they did not care that what they saw as mere puckish misbehaviour — or speaking truth to power — would have permanent, EVIL impacts on very good people.
[BBC] Mr Trump told journalists that he didn't know much about the movement, but added that he'd heard that "these were people who love our country."
The movement is facing a crackdown from Facebook as well as Twitter, who have taken action against thousands of accounts and web addresses linking to videos and websites spreading QAnon's bizarre ideas.
So what is QAnon and who believes in it?
What is it?
At its heart, QAnon is a wide-ranging, unfounded conspiracy theory that says that President Trump is waging a secret war against elite Satan-worshipping paedophiles in government, business and the media.
QAnon believers have speculated that this fight will lead to a day of reckoning where prominent people such as former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton will be arrested and executed.
#11
Anything to distrct the public from Antifa communism, BLM Marxism, Harris Socialism, and Biden's dementia.
Posted by: Marilyn Tojo7566 ||
08/21/2020 17:09 Comments ||
Top||
#12
For anyone that has been on that site understands hat it is. But no were do I read Satan worshiping pedophile's, unless that is an accurate description of the deep state. Oh, maybe it is...
Posted by: 49 Pan ||
08/21/2020 19:32 Comments ||
Top||
[Outdoor Life] Most hunters dial in their centerfires at 100 yards, but you should sight in a rifle at a distance that fits your shooting capabilities and the game you will be pursuing.
An annual question at shooting ranges around the country is "What distance should I zero for?" And the answer is...
The distance that gives you the most flexibility for putting your bullet on target quickly with minimum measuring, guessing, hoping, or missing.
And that’s rarely 100 yards.
THE 100 YARD PROBLEM
The old 100-yard zero is perfect if your longest shooting distance isn’t much beyond that. Otherwise a 100-yard zero wastes your bullet’s trajectory potential. By 200 yards you’re already needing to compensate for bullet drop. To understand this, let’s look at a trajectory that is considered "flat."
I don’t know what you imagine when you hear cartridge XYZ shoots "flat," but when I was a new shooter I assumed it meant the bullet went like a laser to 300 yards or so. That’s flat! But it’s also impossible. Bullets are not light waves. Gravity begins to pull bullets down the instant they leave the muzzle. If you aimed a barrel perfectly in line with a target 100 yards away with the world’s highest B.C. rating at 4,200 fps, it would miss. Oh, it would be close, but it would still fall under the precise point of aim by about an inch.
An inch is no big deal even if you’re shooting squirrels in the head. But at 150 yards this hyper-velocity bullet would already be down by 2.3 inches. At 200 yards it would be low by 4 inches. Gravity is relentless. Meanwhile, back in our real world where most of us shoot "flat shooting" rifles like .243 Win., .270 Win., 7mm Rem. Mag., and the more recent 6mm Creedmoor, 27 Nosler, and 7mm Remington Ultra Magnum, the drops are even greater. We won’t even bother with the .30/30 or .45/70.
#1
I hunt squirrels with PCP pellet rifles...and always zero at 50 yards..(my rim fire CZ .22 cal zero is 50 yards, but I only shoot it at the 100 yard range).
Most shots I get with my pellet rifles are 40-60 yards..rarely beyond 70.
Anybody here zero their shotgun ? LOL
#7
For almost 50 years I have used a Ruger M77 in 7mm Remington magnum and a Leupold vari X II 3 x 9 scope.
I always set my zero at 200 yd. At 100 yards the bullet is 1.5 in above sight line. At 300 the drop is 7 in. At 500 yards drop is 41 in. Got 2 caribou at -50F once at 500 yards. I used hand loads to 0.1 gr of powder. Extremes in Alaska.
Posted by: Alaska Paul ||
08/21/2020 10:36 Comments ||
Top||
#8
I also vote 7 mm Rem Mag. With the results you get, Alaska Paul, you seem to have it dialed in.
Posted by: M. Murcek ||
08/21/2020 10:48 Comments ||
Top||
#9
M Murcek. I shoot 1" groups at 100 yd. I vary the powder loads for various bullet weights (use Hornadays) to keep the same drops at various yards. 175 gr for moose and bear. Lighter for caribou and wolves. Weigh every powder load, but with new digital scales not a problem. Son's lady used my rifle first time and got a caribou in the chest. The only thing I changed out was the trigger guard. The factory aluminum one cracked, so I got a steel one. Safety is convenient and ergonomic.
Posted by: Alaska Paul ||
08/21/2020 14:28 Comments ||
Top||
#10
300WinMag 190gr sighted in at 200 since that's the best my eyes can do, and typical of shots I get. I used to sight at 300 but anymore my rifle is more accurate than I am.
Posted by: Marilyn Tojo7566 ||
08/21/2020 17:07 Comments ||
Top||
#11
Rutgers are nice rifles. I have a Model 1-H Tropical in 458 Win Mag. Never hunted any appropriate game with it but it's interesting. I have several Remington Model 700s, which some people hate even more than Internet Explorer, but I've never had any trouble with them. One is a Sendero II, 300 RUM with a 26" barrel. It can easily be sighted out past 600 yards though that's a bit much for most shooting.
Posted by: M. Murcek ||
08/21/2020 18:38 Comments ||
Top||
#12
My 10 pound Parrot rifle is accurate to a little over a mile but there isn't much left when the round hits..
Posted by: Deacon Blues ||
08/21/2020 19:16 Comments ||
Top||
#13
The question is, do you have canister rounds for Antifa visitors?
#15
Years ago some wag in Field & Stream was asked, "What's the proper length for a fishing rod?" The answer:"Wharever length it is after you shear the tip off with the trunk lid..."
Posted by: M. Murcek ||
08/21/2020 20:01 Comments ||
Top||
#16
Years ago some wag in Field & Stream was asked, "What's the proper length for a fishing rod?" The answer:"Wharever length it is after you shear the tip off with the trunk lid..."
Hahahahah...Ain't that the Gd damned truth; especially with kids.
#18
I have a Ruger American Rifle in .270 Win. Sighted in at 200. I dislike shooting from a bench as they are hard to find out in the woods and plains of Wyoming. But at 200 yards I can put 5 rounds into the space of my palm from prone, sitting and standing using shooting sticks. I feel that's sufficient for my purposes.
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
[LifeSiteNews] Professor Giuseppe Tritto, an internationally known expert in biotechnology and nanotechnology, says that the China Virus definitely wasn’t a freak of nature that happened to cross the species barrier from bat to man.
[FFF] President Trump is saying that he might issue a pardon to Edward Snowden. For some reason, he hasn’t said the same thing about Julian Assange.
[Outdoor Life] Most hunters dial in their centerfires at 100 yards, but you should sight in a rifle at a distance that fits your shooting capabilities and the game you will be pursuing.
