Submit your comments on this article | |||
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia | |||
Ukrainian Perspective: Invasion of Ukraine: March 29, 2025 | |||
2025-03-30 | |||
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. Worth noting, korrespondent.net has compiled its Invasion of Ukraine series into separate months, beginning May 9th, 2023. Linked in the title. [Korrespondent] 18.27 Russians lost thousands of soldiers in the battles for Toretsk: the number of missing in action alone exceeded 13 thousand. This was reported by the speaker of the OTU Lugansk Dmitry Zaporozhets on the air of Yedinye Novyny. ![]() 17:46 US Defense Secretary Pete Gagset
Jennifer Hagseth attended the February meeting of defense ministers at NATO headquarters, which also included a meeting of the Contact Group on Ukraine's defense. 16:54 The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has updated its baseline forecast, which suggests that the war in Ukraine could end in the last months of 2025. At the same time, the fund acknowledges that "risks remain exceptionally high." 14.48 Washington is completely satisfied with the developments in Ukraine. They believe that the "energy ceasefire" is in effect and that a ceasefire in the Black Sea will soon begin to operate. This was stated the day before by US Vice President J.D. Vance during a speech at the US military base Pituffik in Greenland. 13.50 Russians launched a missile attack on Krivoy Rog. The number of injured has risen to seven. Photos of the aftermath have been released, the State Emergency Service and the Prosecutor General's Office reported. 13.01 Ukraine has returned five more children from the temporarily occupied territories (TOT) and Russia. This was reported by the head of the Presidential Office Andriy Yermak. 12.21 Russian aggressors launched a missile strike on the city of Krivoy Rog. Five people were injured, reported the head of the Dnipropetrovsk OVA Serhiy Lysak. 11.35 The aggressor country Russia is dragging out the war in Ukraine because it has not yet experienced real pressure. The Russians are laughing at the world's peacekeeping efforts. President Volodymyr Zelensky wrote this on Facebook, commenting on the Russians' night attack on the Dnieper and other cities of our country on Saturday. 10.01 Ukrainian partisans set fire to a Russian base in Mariupol. Several vehicles burned, Mariupol mayoral adviser Petro Andryushchenko reported . 9.19 On Saturday night, the Russian army attacked Ukraine with 172 drones of various types. Most of them were destroyed or affected by electronic warfare, the Ukrainian Air Force reported . 9.00 As a result of an attack by Russian drones, a recreation center in the Akhtyrsky district of the Sumy region was destroyed. This was reported by the National Police. 8.42 Over the past 24 hours, 183 combat clashes were recorded at the front in 12 directions. This was reported by the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the morning report. The greatest activity of the Russian invaders is recorded in the Pokrovsky direction - 73 assaults in the areas of 14 settlements. 8.02 Over the past 24 hours, the Russian army lost 1,740 soldiers killed and wounded on the front in Ukraine. This was reported by the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the morning report. Ukrainian soldiers burned 23 Russian tanks, dozens of armored vehicles and artillery systems. 7:44 Large-scale fires have been extinguished in the city of Dnipro after yesterday's attack by Russian drones. According to the latest data, four people have died and 21 have been injured, said the head of the Dnipropetrovsk OVA, Serhiy Lysak. 01.01 As a result of the evening attack on the Dnieper, four people were killed and 19 were injured. Several multi-story buildings were damaged. Fires broke out in almost a dozen private houses. A hotel and restaurant complex, garages and service stations also burned. 00.04 Explosions were heard in the temporarily occupied Luhansk in the evening. Russian media reported a major fire in the industrial zone in the north-east of Luhansk. Social networks write that a UAV hit the Transmash plant. It is engaged in the production of railway locomotives and rolling stock, as well as the processing of metal products, the production of electrical equipment, etc. | |||
Posted by:badanov |
#5 "Critics say" = "people I invented to push my agenda". Journolists = not your smartest people, but think they are |
Posted by: Frank G 2025-03-30 16:52 |
#4 TW, I would suggest, at the WSJ, the anonymous source was the reporter at the closest desk to the writer. |
Posted by: The Walking Unvaxed 2025-03-30 13:45 |
#3 ...according to multiple people who were present or had knowledge of the discussions. ...according to people familiar with the meeting. ...and people familiar with the meeting. I'm not a lawyer, but I believe the legal term for that is hearsay. Us commoners would call it gossip. |
Posted by: SteveS 2025-03-30 13:14 |
#2 …anonymous sources. PIMF!! |
Posted by: trailing wife 2025-03-30 13:00 |
#1 I saw a comment somewhere, so I looked up the Wall Street Journal article, which MSN has here. The thing is, the entire article is based on anonymous stories, in paragraph after paragraph undescribed. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who is facing scrutiny over his handling of details of a military strike, brought his wife, a former Fox News producer, to two meetings with foreign military counterparts where sensitive information was discussed, according to multiple people who were present or had knowledge of the discussions. …The group that met at the Pentagon, which included Adm. Tony Radakin, the head of the U.K.’s armed forces, discussed the U.S. rationale behind that decision, as well as future military collaboration between the two allies, according to people familiar with the meeting. attendees are typically expected to possess security clearances given the delicate nature of the discussions, according to defense officials and people familiar with the meeting. There is often security near the meeting space to keep away uninvited attendees. Etc. Given that the Wall Street Journal is decidedly anti-Trump — and the news room is a liberal as the generality of the Mainstream Media, whereas the editorial page is more along the country club Republican end of the spectrum, what odds nobody they “quoted” was anywhere near the rooms in question? |
Posted by: trailing wife 2025-03-30 12:59 |