[Powerline] Defendants contend that Dr. Michael Mann engaged in prejudicial, sanctionable conduct through the knowing introduction to the jury of misleading and false testimony and exhibits in support of his claim for damages resulting from an alleged loss of grant funding as a consequence of Defendants’ statements.***
Here, the Court finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that Dr. Mann, through Mr. Fontaine and Mr. Williams, acted in bad faith when they presented erroneous evidence and made false representations to the jury and the Court regarding damages stemming from loss of grant funding. Specifically, the Court finds that Mr. Fontaine and Mr. Williams knowingly violated the rules of professional conduct in eliciting testimony and offering evidence related to (1) the post-publication unfunded grant amounts depicted in Exhibit 517A, and as reproduced in Exhibit 117, and (2) the post-publication funded grant amounts in Exhibit 116.
-------------------
Nothing in any of the mainstream press yet.
A sugar daddy will likely pay the fine on Mann.
Mann's lawyers will have a black mark on them.
Related:
Michael Mann 03/08/2025 Media silent as award in libel case filed by celebrity scientist Michael Mann is lowered to $5,000
Michael Mann 03/17/2024 More on how the Gaza fatality numbers are faked
Michael Mann 02/10/2024 Steyn, Simberg Found Liable in Mann Suit
Michael Mann 03/08/2025 Media silent as award in libel case filed by celebrity scientist Michael Mann is lowered to $5,000
Michael Mann 03/17/2024 More on how the Gaza fatality numbers are faked
Michael Mann 02/10/2024 Steyn, Simberg Found Liable in Mann Suit