Submit your comments on this article |
Government Corruption |
Is the End of the Democrats' Lawfare Strategy Against the Trump Admin In Sight? |
2025-02-28 |
[PJMedia] In a major blow to the Democrats![]() white people, white supremacy, whiteanything but paint, you're listening to a Democrat. Ask him/her/it to reimagine something for you; they do that a lot, though not well. They can hear a dog whistle a mile or two away. They invented the spoils system and Tammany Hall, and inspired the addition of the word (Thomas) Nastyto the English language. They want to stop continental drift and repeal the law of unintended side effects... ' lawfare strategy to prevent the Trump administration from governing, Chief Justice John Roberts responded to the White House's request for emergency intervention. Roberts blocked a Biden-appointed federal judge's order that around $2 billion in frozen foreign aid funds be released immediately. The Chief Justice issued an administrative stay on Feb. 27, preserving the status quo while the Supreme Court considers the matter more thoroughly. This temporary action overrides U.S. District Judge Amir Ali's midnight deadline, which would have forced the State Department and USAID to release billions in taxpayer dollars for already completed foreign aid work. Roberts, who oversees requests for emergency relief arising from cases in the District of Columbia, acted alone in halting the decision from a federal district judge issued Tuesday. The judge, U.S. District Judge Amir Ali, gave the State Department and USAID until 11:59 p.m. Wednesday to pay its bills to contractors for work that had been completed before Feb. 13. The Trump administration had earlier in the night asked the Supreme Court to intervene in the dispute involving frozen foreign assistance funds. Roberts gave the State Department and USAID contractors until noon Friday to respond to the Trump administration's request. This is just the latest example of how Democrats' lawfare strategy against Trump might ultimately backfire spectacularly. Judicial rulings temporarily halting Trump's actions may ultimately serve to advance his broader objectives as they make their way to the Supreme Court. The Trump administration filed the emergency appeal hours before the deadline, arguing that Judge Ali had overstepped his authority and interfered with the president's obligations to "make appropriate judgments about foreign aid." The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals panel had declined to stay Judge Ali's order, absurdly claiming his orders "could not be appealed." Excuse me? When did District Court judges get the final say in such matters? During a particularly revealing telephone hearing on Feb. 25, Judge Ali couldn't hide his bias against the Trump administration. "I don't know why I can't get a straight answer from you," he complained after Justice Department attorney Indraneel Sur repeatedly avoided his leading questions about fund releases. "I guess I'm not understanding where there is any confusion here. It's clear as day," Ali further insisted, regarding his original order. Chief Justice Roberts has ordered the challengers to file a response by Friday, with the Supreme Court likely to act soon after — a sign that the Court is poised to nip these endless legal challenges in the bud. |
Posted by:trailing wife |
#4 Has the Left ever given up on programs that don't work or are inefficient? |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2025-02-28 10:33 |
#3 California Judge Finds Mass-Firings Of Probationary Federal Employees Likely Unlawful |
Posted by: Skidmark 2025-02-28 10:13 |
#2 Federal Judge Declines To Halt Firings Of CIA Officers Tied To DEI Programs |
Posted by: Skidmark 2025-02-28 10:12 |
#1 And still people are profoundly ignorant of what the US Congress can do to rein in the Deep State's lawfare strategy and restore sanity to the US judiciary below the level of the Supreme Court. |
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 2025-02-28 09:33 |