Submit your comments on this article |
Home Front: Politix |
California Dems want to sue Big Oil for horrific L.A. fires |
2025-01-28 |
Two California Democrats unveiled a bill Monday that they said would allow insurers and policyholders affected by the Los Angeles fires to sue major oil corporations for their alleged role in the disaster. That didn't take long. Democratic California State Sen. Scott Wiener and a host of other Democrats rolled out Senate Bill 222 on Monday, characterizing it as a means to make oil companies atone for the fires and stabilize California's faltering insurance market. This, as residents pick up the pieces from the devastation. Weiner and Pérez say that oil companies bear responsibility for the fires because of their supposed role in climate change. This, even though critics say a litany of policy decisions and failures appear to have much more directly fanned the flames, as evidenced by things like malfunctioning fire hydrants. "Californians shouldn't be the only ones to pay the costs of devastating climate disasters. From last year's floods to the fires in LA, we know that the fossil fuel industry bears ultimate responsibility for fueling these disasters," Wiener said in a post to X, addressing the new legislation. "The fossil fuel companies knew this was going to happen. They had the studies decades ago, suppressed them & obstructed policy changes to transition away from fossil fuels & toward clean energy." |
Posted by:Besoeker |
#12 Guess it's no wonder Chevron left California, where it'd been for probably a good 100 years. How any business can stand remaining in California is beyond me (politically connected ones aside). |
Posted by: DooDahMan 2025-01-28 17:03 |
#11 Eaton fire appears to have started by an overhead powerline fault(s) of some sort. There's a surveillance video of the initial sparks and subsequent burning on the ground. Southern California Edison system, I believe. |
Posted by: Mullah Richard 2025-01-28 16:40 |
#10 ...Cause in 19th AD, they've been burning a lot of coal. |
Posted by: Grom the Affective 2025-01-28 16:29 |
#9 ^you mean 19th BC? |
Posted by: Grom the Affective 2025-01-28 16:27 |
#8 ...by moving out of California. Let the state enjoy the 'green' benefits of the 19th Century. |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2025-01-28 16:24 |
#7 Isn't it time for oil companies to start fighting back against envirofreaks? |
Posted by: Grom the Affective 2025-01-28 16:15 |
#6 Those with deep pockets are already leaving California. This will really speed up the process. |
Posted by: Ululating Platypus 2025-01-28 15:56 |
#5 Why not the Almond Farms? |
Posted by: swksvolFF 2025-01-28 12:12 |
#4 Just like Democrats to blame somebody else for the problems they create. Let's suppose, just for argument's sake, that climate change is not some green commie fantasy. Even so, there are all kinds of things people like Newsom and Bass could have done to mitigate the impact. Things like hiring more firefighters and giving them the equipment they need to do their jobs, cutting fire brakes, clearing dead brush and planting green belts with ice plant, making sure the reservoirs are full so the fire hydrants don't run dry, actually checking the fire hydrants at regular intervals and making sure they don't get stolen (which has been happening), letting insurance companies set realistic premiums so they don't go broke paying claims for fires in fire prone areas. On and on it goes. It's not my job to know all the things that could be done. It's theirs and they didn't do it. So now they wanna blame the oil companies? Wait for it; the oil companies will leave California just like the insurance companies. Who will Newsom blame then? |
Posted by: Abu Uluque 2025-01-28 12:07 |
#3 Grifters gotta grift |
Posted by: DarthVader 2025-01-28 10:56 |
#2 SQUIRREL! |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2025-01-28 10:45 |
#1 Seriously? |
Posted by: swksvolFF 2025-01-28 10:10 |