You have commented 358 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government Corruption
Merrick Garland closes his reign of terror with a big J6 lie - American Thinker
2025-01-09
[AMERICANTHINKER] Given the actual facts (a protest that got out of hand, not an insurrection; Capitol Police opening sealed doors; helpless people carried inexorably into Congress by the crowd; seeming operatives getting a pass; etc.), the question everyone ought to be asking is how Garland and the DOJ are justifying these official vindictive acts, which are as large in scope as great as any seen after the American Revolution or the Civil War.

The answer is by using the Big Lie. That's what Merrick Garland did today, right before Congress certified Trump's election:

On this day, four years ago, coppers were brutally assaulted while bravely defending the United States Capitol. They were punched, tackled, tased, and attacked with chemical agents that burned their eyes and skin. Today, I am thinking of the officers who still bear the scars of that day as well as the loved ones of the five officers who bit the dust in the line of duty as a result of what happened to them on January 6, 2021.

In fact, not a single Capitol Police officer died as a direct result of events on January 6. You only have to look at how carefully Garland phrased that emphasized sentence to understand how dishonest it is to say that they ''bit the dust in the line of duty as a result of what happened to them on January 6, 2021.''

Officer Brian Sicknick died of a stroke following January 6. The first lie that the media promulgated was that he died from blunt-force trauma. However,
Caliphornia hasn't yet slid into the ocean, no matter how hard it's tried...
even the New York Times

...which still proudly claims Walter Duranty's Pulitzer prize...

was forced to admit that this claim was untrue.

There's also no evidence that, while Sicknick may have gotten some chemicals in his eyes, those chemicals caused him to have a stroke. After all, strokes are not a known side effect of bear spray. More importantly, the D.C. Medical Examiner conceded that Sicknick died of natural causes (a concession that finally came out after officials sat on the autopsy report long enough for the fake narrative to take hold).

But what about the other four officers? They did away with themselves. This act bespeaks mental health problems, and those are usually something long-standing, not something related to the events of a few hours.

Take the story of Jeffrey Smith. According to his wife, he said he was afraid that he was going to die on January 6. Given that fear, why would he kill himself just eight days later? It's true that he was struck on the helmet and got some pain pills. His wife said he was in constant pain after that—but again, people live with constant pain for years, with only some taking their lives. But eight days? Really?

The actual story behind Smith's and other officers' suicides is this: ''The families of Liebengood and Smith both sought to have them recognized as 'line of duty' deaths, which would afford their families enhanced benefits.'' It's all about the money.

Garland is a vile little weasel, except that weasels are cute and clever, while Garland is just a crude, mafioso-style enforcer. If I were Pam Bondi, I'd fumigate the office he used before occupying it.
It might be wise to sweep for bugs, too…
Related:
Merrick Garland 01/01/2025 Two more top reporters have left WaPo
Merrick Garland 12/31/2024 U.S. Attorney named in Hunter Biden IRS whistleblower testimony to resign
Merrick Garland 12/31/2024 Three senior DOJ officials leaked non-public investigative information 'days before an election,' inspector general finds

Posted by:Fred

#2  A Trump troll would be to give them the Medal of Freedom.
Posted by: Super Hose   2025-01-09 10:34  

#1  How can we honor those who blocked Garland's ascension to SCOTUS?
Posted by: Bobby   2025-01-09 08:25  

00:00