Comments

You have commented 358 times on Rantburg.

Your Name

Your e-mail (optional)

Website (optional)

	My Original Nic Pic-a-Nic Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Foto

Submit your comments on this article

Home Front: Politix

Deep State Creep John Brennan Has the Nerve to Question Tulsi Gabbard's Fitness for National Security Role (VIDEO)

2024-11-16

[Real Clear Politics] JOHN BRENNAN: Clearly, Tulsi Gabbard has taken actions and made statements over the past several years that raise serious questions about her common sense, judgment, and political sympathies. Cozying up to Putin as well as to Bashar al-Assad shows she doesn't have the type of perspective needed for someone who is going to head up these 18 intelligence agencies.

As Tom Nichols said, she doesn't have any qualifications. The Director of National Intelligence is a serious and complex position that requires someone who actually understands the intelligence community. It’s like an orchestra conductor for all the different agencies and departments involved in the intelligence process. I don’t think she understands the instruments involved in this orchestra, nor has she had any experience at the strategic level of running and leading a large, complex organization.

The Director of National Intelligence is, according to legislation, the President’s principal intelligence adviser, responsible for ensuring the President’s daily brief is put together in a sound and forthright manner. This person also puts together the budget and sets the priorities for the intelligence community. This appointment is sending shockwaves not only in the United States but also around the globe. Is this really someone Donald Trump is going to entrust with the care and leadership of the intelligence community? An unserious pick for a serious position.

Posted by:Besoeker

#6 Take his clearance.

Posted by: Super Hose 2024-11-16 13:03

#5 Brennan has a lot to answer for from previous administration. He's not fit to weigh in on Gabbard. He's part of the rot.

Posted by: JohnQC 2024-11-16 10:39

#4 This is the guy who is / was in the US Communist Party, right? Funny how that's never brought up.

Posted by: Raj 2024-11-16 10:18

#3 I love it when someone starts their argument with, "Clearly".

'Obviously', you're a moron if you don't agree.

Hey, that works, too!

Posted by: Bobby 2024-11-16 09:14

#2 "Is this really someone Donald Trump is going to entrust with the care and leadership of the intelligence community?"

I suppose you think YOU (CREEPY JOHN BRENNAN?) would be a better choice? The last thing the USA is a traitor like you in any position of responsibility.

Posted by: Whiskey Mike 2024-11-16 07:29

#1 Gabbard has no loyalty to the Klingtons or their agenda. Therein lies Brennan's problem. Expect to see some grey beard intel experts within arms reach of Gabbards office on day one.

Posted by: Besoeker 2024-11-16 05:52

00:00