You have commented 358 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Ben & Jerry's sues Unilever, accusing it of silencing pro-Palestinian stance on Gaza
2024-11-16
I think that's a fine idea. Everyone should be reminded just what their overpriced product stands for. Unilever doesn't, naturally, since they make their living selling it.
[TIMESOFISRAEL] Ice cream brand Ben & Jerry's alleged in a lawsuit filed Wednesday that parent company Unilever has silenced its attempts to express support for Paleostinians in Gazoo
...Hellhole adjunct to Israel and Egypt's Sinai Peninsula, inhabited by Gazooks. The place was acquired in the wake of the 1967 War and then presented to Paleostinian control in 2006 by Ariel Sharon, who had entered his dotage. It is currently ruled with a rusty iron fist by Hamas with about the living conditions you'd expect. It periodically attacks the Hated Zionist Entity whenever Iran needs a ruckus created or the hard boyz get bored, getting thumped by the IDF in return. The ruling turbans then wave the bloody shirt and holler loudly about oppression and disproportionate response...
amid the ongoing Israel-Hamas
..the well-beloved offspring of the Moslem Brotherhood,...
war, and threatened to dismantle its board and sue its members over the issue.

The lawsuit is the latest sign of the long-simmering tensions between Ben & Jerry's and consumer products maker Unilever. A rift erupted between the two in 2021 after Ben & Jerry's said it would stop selling its products in what it termed ''Occupied Paleostinian Territory'' because it was inconsistent with its values, a move that led some investors to divest Unilever shares.

The American ice cream maker then sued Unilever for selling its business in Israel to its licensee there, which allowed marketing in the West Bank and Israel to continue. That lawsuit was settled in 2022.

In its new lawsuit, Ben & Jerry's says that Unilever has breached the terms of the 2022 settlement, which has remained confidential. As part of the agreement, Unilever is required to ''respect and acknowledge the Ben & Jerry's independent board's primary responsibility over Ben & Jerry's social mission,'' according to the lawsuit.

''Ben & Jerry's has on four occasions attempted to publicly speak out in support of peace and human rights
...which are often intentionally defined so widely as to be meaningless...
,'' according to the lawsuit. ''Unilever has silenced each of these efforts.''
Related:
Unilever 08/09/2024 Ad Group 'Discontinuing' GARM Initiative Following Elon Musk Lawsuit - Business Insider
Unilever 06/28/2024 Transatlanticist with good hands. What else is known about the new NATO Secretary General
Unilever 02/13/2024 Hamas says 'Israel freeing two captives a marketing ploy for a defeated army'

Posted by:trailing wife

#4  I worked at Haagen-Dazs corporate mpls. Ben and Jerry's was considered stoner snack food.
Posted by: Woodrow   2024-11-16 20:46  

#3  I predict that lawyers will get richer.
Posted by: Super Hose   2024-11-16 13:10  

#2  So, suing the people who you sold the business to because they want to make money.
That's gonna encourage people to take you seriously.
Posted by: ed in texas   2024-11-16 08:44  

#1  Quit them back in 2020 when they went mouthy political.



Posted by: NN2N1   2024-11-16 03:37  

00:00