Submit your comments on this article |
Syria-Lebanon-Iran |
Sobering up the US and Israel. Vladimir Putin met with the President of Iran |
2024-10-13 |
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. by Gevorg Mirzayan [REGNUM] On October 11, Russian President Vladimir Putin took part in the forum “Interconnection of Times and Civilizations — the Basis of Peace and Development,” held in the capital of Turkmenistan, Ashgabat. The first and second persons of Central Asian countries, as well as Iran, Turkey, Pakistan, Armenia, and Mongolia gathered there. ![]() The forum was held as part of the program to celebrate the 300th anniversary of the Turkmen poet and philosopher Makhtumkuli Fragi - an event that would seem to be far removed from big politics. But the leaders of the states came because in this case the interests of both the hosts of the event, the authorities of Turkmenistan headed by the young president Serdar Berdimuhamedov, and the distinguished guests coincided. The owners need international contacts. "In many ways, this forum, like other events held by the Turkmen side, is aimed at maintaining the appearance of international activity of Turkmenistan. Having declared "complete neutrality" at the dawn of its formation, the country itself placed itself in isolation. However, in modern conditions, it is forced to build relations with other states - after all, it turns out that Turkmenistan cannot solve its internal and external problems on its own," Nikita Mendkovich, head of the Eurasian Analytical Club, explains to Regnum News Agency. In particular, the country needs Russia's support to protect its borders with Afghanistan, the expert notes. In addition, it needs to deepen economic contacts with its Central Asian neighbors and participate in international infrastructure projects in the Caspian Sea, including in the North-South corridor. The guests needed a platform where they could meet to discuss issues related to security and economics in the Central Asian, Caspian and even Middle Eastern regions in bilateral and multilateral formats. There were many topics for discussion. “Moscow took advantage of this event to conduct a number of working contacts,” continues Nikita Mendkovich. Vladimir Putin met with Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari – as one can assume, the parties discussed issues related to possible Russian recognition of the Taliban (the organization is under UN sanctions for terrorist activity, and is also recognized as terrorist in Russia) as the legitimate authorities of Afghanistan. In addition, the Russian president spoke with the speaker of the Turkish parliament, Numan Kurtulmuş. The official Kremlin website reports that the upcoming visit of President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan to the BRICS summit in Kazan was discussed. According to Nikita Mendkovich, the discussion could also have been about Syrian affairs – a possible meeting between Erdoğan and Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. However, experts call Putin's most important bilateral meeting in Turkmenistan his talks with the new Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian. The leaders of the two countries met for the first time - and immediately to discuss the most important issues. "The conversation primarily focused on the upcoming signing of a comprehensive strategic agreement - it is to take place in Kazan, during the October BRICS summit. Officially, they have been working on this document for more than two years, and according to my information, more than five," international political scientist and RIAC expert Elena Suponina told Regnum. According to her, the parties reached the finish line in September of this year. Now it is extremely important to determine what will be written in the points of the agreement devoted to mutual assistance in the event of military threats. “Will these be formulations similar to those in the Russian-North Korean agreements (where the parties committed to providing assistance in the event of aggression), or will the parties agree on a softer option?” Suponina explains. According to a number of experts, a softer option is preferable for Russia. Moscow can defend its territory independently, and there is no point in taking on obligations to protect Iran from aggression. Moreover, it does not matter whether it is aggression from the US and Israel (that is, drawing Russia into a nuclear war), or from Arab states - with which Moscow has no conflicts. And in general, the time of military alliances with strict obligations is becoming a thing of the past, giving way to more flexible formats of relations. The Iranians certainly understand this. Tehran's minimum goal is to receive at least significant military-technical assistance from Russia in the event of a conflict with the US, which Israel is pushing it into. “We could be talking about air defense systems and fighter jets,” suggests Elena Suponina. That is, to neutralize the air superiority of the US and Israel - the Iranians, given their capabilities, will cope with the ground component of the war on their own. If the ground component happens at all - of course, it would be nice if it did not happen. In the diplomatic arena, Russia calls on everyone to resolve issues peacefully. "Moscow has always been against any strikes on Iran, considering this a prologue to a possible major war in the region. It has always criticized Israel and the United States for dangerous actions of this kind and their intentions to continue them. And by signing an important agreement with Iran, the Kremlin makes it clear that it will not leave this country alone. Just as the Chinese will not leave it alone," says the interlocutor of the Regnum news agency, hinting at the close economic and military-political ties between Beijing and Tehran. Accordingly, the Iranians are making it clear to the Americans through a series of international negotiations that a military operation would cost them too much. At the same time, it seemed that Pezeshkian would not hold such demonstration meetings: after his recent election victory, rumors were spreading that he was liberal-minded and was looking for negotiations with the West, and that deepening cooperation with Russia was not in his plans. But in reality, things are different. "Some of the rumors about Masoud Pezeshkian are inspired by Western news agencies and intelligence services. They are trying to attribute more liberal positions to the Iranian president than those he actually holds. Pezeshkian is an absolutely systemic politician, he obeys the general rules of the game and the will of the spiritual leader of the country, Ali Khamenei," Elena Suponina is sure. And Ali Khamenei is well aware of the benefits and advantages not only of expanding, but also of deepening cooperation with Moscow. |
Posted by:badanov |
#10 #8 How'd that contradicts #6? |
Posted by: Grom the Reflective 2024-10-13 18:29 |
#9 hello TW just read your very informative and excellent reply from yesterday I’m always glad to be useful, returning a small part of what I’ve learnt here. Interesting that some Bin Laden relatives fled to Iran. Are you sure about that? Bin Laden was in Pakistan when they jugged him Osama Bin Laden, a couple of wives and a few of his 25 children were found in Abbottabad, Pakistan, yes. But I am positive that many of his wives and children went to Iran. We have records all through the Rantburg archives. Responding to a posted article back in 2020, I summarized it all here, which should give you a starting point for your own searches. There is a Search Rantburg box above the list of most recent commenters on each of Rantburg’s main pages — go and learn, my dear. |
Posted by: trailing wife 2024-10-13 18:24 |
#8 I thought Bismarck wanted a strong relationship between [Imperial] Germany and [Czarist] Russia. |
Posted by: DooDahMan 2024-10-13 17:16 |
#7 #7 That sounds like a quotation. Bismarck? |
Posted by: Grom the Reflective 2024-10-13 16:42 |
#6 Russia is at heart an uncivilized nation and an oriental despotism. To state that. "They are civilised and have an ancient culture," is to deny what Peter the Great accomplished in creating a veneer of civilization in the land of mazjiks. |
Posted by: S MAI 2024-10-13 16:06 |
#5 #4, It is my understanding Australia has backed off antagonizing China. Trade priority for Australia. Lg gas major export to China. I say leave Asia alone. Fascism rules here. Trade is the priority. Difficulties will be endured as long a commerce continues. |
Posted by: Dale 2024-10-13 08:04 |
#4 is this the reason why we are escalating Australia is escalating? |
Posted by: Skidmark 2024-10-13 07:07 |
#3 Some believed Saddam's WMD materials may have migrated to Syria just prior to the Gulf War. Perhaps the President of Iran is looking for a WMD sancturary as well. |
Posted by: Besoeker 2024-10-13 02:45 |
#2 hello TW just read your very informative and excellent reply from yesterday Interesting that some Bin Laden relatives fled to Iran. Are you sure about that? Bin Laden was in Pakistan when they jugged him Pakistan: another country we aren't doing anything about. Yes, I think the Saudis do want war with Iran but don't want to fight themselves, they want the US to do it for them. It's easy to do, manipulate the leadership and then they order the military. It's what Iran did by planting the "WMD" lie to get us to fight Saddam. They were involved in that psyop. I was shocked when I found out Iran had been involved in that trickery because I had believed the WMD line. Saudi wants to fight Iran as the power centre of their religious Shia religious rival. They are fighting the shia in Yemen over the border right now. They are already in effect fighting "Iran" as they are Sunnis fighting Shia. They just want to manipulate us into doing it for them. And they love that Israel gets ground up in the middle, because they want it wiped off the map as much as the Hamas does, because of Islam. Even when they pay lip service and sign off on recognising Israel, they want it gone. Even if Iran is the problem and is whipping up all the trouble - and I'm quite prepared to believe this is so, they are a horrible theocracy, then still we should be attacking Qatar over October 7 What bugs me is the using of October 7 to change the target. Even if Iran is a general problem in other ways, it was Muslim Brotherhood that did October 7, including Qatar so we have to get rid of THEM |
Posted by: Anon1 2024-10-13 02:38 |
#1 is this the reason why we are escalating with Iran while doing NOTHING to Qatar? I don't have any problem with Vladimir Putin. Russia is it's own country free to have whoever they want in power, and I think he was justified in sending the military in to Ukraine given they were killing the Russian speakers in the eastern breakaway provinces - especially as it was Russian territory for all of history until Kruschev. so i don't see why we keep picking fights with russia. I like russia. Russia produced Tchaikovsky and Faberge eggs. They are civilised and have an ancient culture. Leave them alone, the cold war was over when the wall came down. We should be supporting our christian orthodox brothers in the east against Islam which is the enemy of all. |
Posted by: Anon1 2024-10-13 02:29 |