You have commented 358 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Land of the Free
San Francicso Runs Afoul of the EPA
2024-08-07
[Epoch Times] The Supreme Court stated that it will hear San Francisco’s challenge to Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) water pollution regulations on Oct. 16. The July 26 announcement came as several water management agencies and local governments filed a brief with the nation’s highest court supporting San Francisco’s position in the case.

The EPA’s generic prohibitions leave the City vulnerable to enforcement based on whether the Pacific Ocean meets state-adopted water quality standards.
The city argued in court papers that the agency’s wastewater discharge rules are so "vague" and "nebulous" that they violate federal law.

The city claims that EPA officials misinterpreted a provision of the federal Clean Water Act of 1972 (CWA) when they issued a wastewater discharge permit. In issuing the permit, the officials deviated from the framework of the statute so much that it had the effect of reviving the old regulatory approach that the law had replaced, according to the city.

According to the city, its most recent permit is one of many issued across the country that failed to notify the permit holders about what they must do to comply with the Clean Water Act.

The city’s permit states that San Francisco may not cause or contribute to "exceedances" of water quality standards. Instead of simply advising the city "how much it needs to control its discharges to comply with the Act," the EPA’s "generic prohibitions leave the City vulnerable to enforcement based on whether the Pacific Ocean meets state-adopted water quality standards," according to the petition.

U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar had urged the Supreme Court in an April 12 brief to not accept the case, writing that wastewater discharge permits are specific enough.
Related:
San Francisco: 2024-08-01 The Left Can't Meme... So They Made it Illegal
San Francisco: 2024-07-31 Fox News anchor Bret Baier... [stands up].
San Francisco: 2024-07-31 Pete Buttigieg dared Americans to look up crime data. I did and it's not pretty for Democrats
Related:
Environmental Protection Agency: 2024-08-03 Whitmer asks EPA to temporarily lift climate restrictions on summer fuel
Environmental Protection Agency: 2024-07-31 DEI at it's finest.
Environmental Protection Agency: 2024-06-29 You Keep Using The Term 'Authoritarian'...
Related:
Clean Water Act: 2023-07-18 How China Is Destroying American Farmland-And Getting All The Best Ham And Bacon!
Clean Water Act: 2023-05-29 The Supreme Court Just Voted Unanimously To Rein In Biden's EPA
Clean Water Act: 2023-05-25 Breaking: SCOTUS unanimously yanks chain on EPA in Sackett
Posted by:Bobby

#8  <3
Posted by: trailing wife   2024-08-07 13:12  

#7  I stand corrected
Posted by: Mercutio   2024-08-07 12:23  

#6  Speaking of a fowl...Kamala Harris has avoided interviews for more than two weeks since becoming Dem nominee
Posted by: Skidmark   2024-08-07 10:57  

#5  Silly Mercutio! All that $#it is natural and organic

Just think of it as a vaccine, a small dose of infectious agent given to stimulate your immune system. It's not pollution. It's a government-mandated cholera vaccine.
Posted by: SteveS   2024-08-07 10:29  

#4   $#it on the streets would have rung EPA's bell before

Silly Mercutio! All that $#it is natural and organic — the Circle of Life, man! — so it’s a good thing there’s lots of it.
Posted by: trailing wife   2024-08-07 10:23  

#3  San Francisco, toxic?
Who knew!
Posted by: Skidmark   2024-08-07 10:11  

#2  You would think the all $#it on the streets would have rung EPA's bell before this.
Posted by: Mercutio   2024-08-07 08:54  

#1  Pity they both can't lose.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2024-08-07 08:05  

00:00