Submit your comments on this article | |
Syria-Lebanon-Iran | |
Israelis were targeting an air defense radar site near Isfahan that's part of the protection of the Natanz nuclear facility | |
2024-04-20 | |
[TWITTER]
![]() spontaneouslytaking over other countries' embassies, maintaining whorehouses run by clergymen, involvement in international drug trafficking, and financing sock puppet militiasto extend the regime's influence. The word Iranis a cognate form of Aryan.The abbreviation IRGCis the same idea as Stürmabteilung (or SA).The term Supreme Guideis a the modern version form of either Duceor Führeror maybe both. They hate overnight Thursday-Friday went beyond the scope of several small drones described by Tehran, US media reported later Friday. The strike reportedly included three missiles launched by Israeli Air Force warplanes that targeted an air defense radar site near Isfahan that was part of an array defending the nearby top-secret Natanz nuclear site. The reports, first published by ABC, cited a US official as saying that the missiles were fired from outside of Iranian airspace. According to the ABC report, the strike was "very limited." It said that according to an initial assessment, the strike took out the radar site, but the assessment had not yet been completed. The ABC report did not say if the missiles were in addition to the drones reported by Iran. A New York Times ![]() ...which still proudly displays Walter Duranty's Pulitzer prize... report late on Friday, which also said Israeli planes fired the missiles, noted that the new information suggested that the Israel strike "included more advanced firepower than initial reports indicated." The Times said it was "not immediately clear the types of missiles used, from where they were fired, whether any were intercepted by Iran’s defenses or where they landed." Iran had claimed earlier that three small drones were involved in the attack on Isfahan. State TV said that the small aircraft were destroyed by air defenses, and it made no mention of any missiles or damage in the attack. Authorities said air defenses fired at a major air base in Isfahan, which long has been home to Iran’s fleet of American-made F-14 Tomcats — purchased before the 1979 Islamic Revolution. Israel has not officially commented on the strike. | |
Posted by:Fred |
#5 ...and then we find there was a reason to take out the S-300 AD. F-35 Inability to Detect Russian S-300 Frequencies “Alarming” |
Posted by: Skidmark 2024-04-20 23:38 |
#4 One can hope for more! |
Posted by: Chesney+Sleting4519 2024-04-20 14:52 |
#3 1/2 measures. I wonder... An air strike typically has two phases. First comes the suppression of enemy air defense (buzzword: SEAD) where the SAM sites get jammed and/or whacked, followed by the main strike package that blows the target(s) to hell and gone. Being a big whoop dee doo, it's hard to ignore or deny it happened. And generally, everyone know who done it. One the other hand, suppose the exact same events play out in slow motion. An AD radar blows up near Isfahan, for example. No one takes credit and the victims can blame it on an accident or insurgents or whatever. They don't need to respond because no one claimed the deed and no one is losing face. A week or two later, a similar thing happens. Over time, air defense systems are removed from the board, when suddenly all hell breaks loose and important things are blowing up everywhere all at once. tl;dr: What if we are witnessing a slow-motion response to the Iranian attack? They say revenge is a dish best served cold. Maybe it is even better on small plates. |
Posted by: SteveS 2024-04-20 11:37 |
#2 1/2 measures. |
Posted by: Skidmark 2024-04-20 09:09 |
#1 Iranian FM: Israeli weapons are ‘toys for our children to play with’ |
Posted by: Grom the Reflective 2024-04-20 04:30 |