You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Land of the Free
VDH - California, the Great Destroyer
2024-03-23
[American Greatness] n 1996, the California legislature created the high speed rail authority.

In 2008, voters passed an initial nearly $10 billion bond to build an envisioned 800 mile, $33 billion project eventually to link Sacramento with San Diego.

Fifteen years later, a scaled-down plan from Bakersfield to Merced remains not even half finished. Yet the envisioned costs will exceed that of the original estimate for the entire project.

The rail authority now estimates that just the modest 178 mile route—only about a fifth of the authorized distance—will not be completed at least until 2030. Past high speed estimates of both time and cost targets have been widely wrong and perhaps deliberately misleading.

Total costs for the entire project are now estimated at nearly $130 billion. Many expect that figure to double in the next quarter-century. Planners also concede there will likely not be much high speed rider demand from San Joaquin Valley residents willing to pay $86 to travel at a supposed 200 mph from Bakersfield to Merced.

Nine years ago voters amid drought and water shortages also passed a state water bond, authorizing $7.5 billion in new water projects and initiatives.

Some $2.7 billion was targeted for new dams and reservoirs. The current water storage system had not been enlarged since the early 1980s, when the state population was 15 million fewer residents.

So far not a single dam or new reservoir has been built. And Californians expect more water rationing statewide anytime the state experiences a modest drought.

In 2017, a $15 billion bond authorized a complete remodeling of Los Angeles International Airport—recognized as one of the more congested, disorganized, and unpleasant airports in America.

Now the cost to complete the project has grown to an estimated $30 billion, with a proposed finish date of 2028—11 years after the project was authorized.

And the ongoing LAX remake is considered one of California’s more successful public construction projects.
Posted by:Besoeker

#3  If they had spent just a small fraction of that $130 billion to maintain Interstate 5 and maybe add some new lanes to it then at least we could drive from San Diego to Sacramento without all the traffic jams and potholes.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2024-03-23 13:46  

#2  I voted for it because I believe that civilized nations have trains. Well, civilized nations do have trains but California is becoming more and more uncivilized every day. I should have known with guys like Jerry Brown running the show that it would be just another boondoggle.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2024-03-23 13:40  

#1  I voted against the initiative. I thought it was a bad idea. I had no idea it was this bad of an idea.
Posted by: Super Hose   2024-03-23 12:57  

00:00