You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Submit your comments on this article
Home Front: Politix
Trump trial: The camera never lies
2023-10-04
[American Thinker] The judge presiding over the New York civil fraud case against President Donald Trump decided to invite the media cameras into the courtroom, but what became obvious is the camera never lies.

I don’t doubt for a moment that showing Trump at bay motivated Judge Arthur Engoron’s allowing of the media to show the beginning of the proceedings. Trump gave the cameras nothing: no anxious movements and no emotional reactions to feed the media pundits.

Instead, viewers saw the mad dog glare of New York Attorney General Letitia James focused on Trump like a laser.

Maybe her stare was genuine or maybe she was playing for the cameras? Maybe both?

Anyway. As the photogs made their way out, Engoron gladly removed his glasses and flashed a creepy smile for the cameras as if he landed the big one.

Posted by:Besoeker

#7   ^ Yeah. You think banks are that easy to fool when lending that kind of money?
Posted by: Unavirong Hupimp2017   2023-10-04 18:32  

#6  I still have not gotten any answer to the question, Whom exactly did Trump defraud?
Posted by: Tom   2023-10-04 15:53  

#5  What a piss. It was all play except the 'judge' and prosecution pottying themselves.

You know, maybe that was fair to show all the kangaroos.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2023-10-04 15:25  

#4  That isn't a judge. A judge has professionalism.

That isn't an actor. An actor wouldn't break role to mug for a camera.

That isn't a hack. A hack could play the part.

That is a buffoon for pay.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2023-10-04 15:20  

#3  Trump posted a picture of the clerk posing with Chuckey Schumer and asked if this was Chucky's new girlfriend.
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2023-10-04 14:36  

#2  Gag orders were never intended for defendants.
Posted by: Super Hose   2023-10-04 11:51  

#1  This is the same judge who slapped a gag order on Trump because Trump said mean things about his clerk? Doesn't that violate Trump's First Amendment rights? And now we see how he enjoys his role in the persecution of a political opponent by presiding over a kangaroo court. What a prick.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2023-10-04 11:35  

00:00