You have commented 358 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Land of the Free
It's Now Safe to Say That Home Ownership is Evil
2023-09-09
[News With Views] Did you ever stop to realize that wanting to achieve the American Dream — a chicken in every pot and two cars in your garage — is "the problem"? Yep! You and your selfish dream are destroying this country. I kid you not.

The article "The problem with America’s high homeownership rate" by Felix Salmon [i] spells it out loud and clear. It begins by telling us that our decades-long love affair with homeownership is not only holding back the economy, but also "hobbling the Federal Reserve (as if their problem isn’t self-inflicted) and exacerbating a national housing crisis." Nope, sorry. The housing crisis is greatly driven by the big non-governmental organizations (NOGs) gobbling up houses to turn into rentals, for now (a story for another time). And, as in Hawaii, taking people’s property via the insurance companies (other NGOs) denying coverage for the fire damages.

Further down it says there is "a deeply inefficient distribution of where people live". As if people should not choose where they want to live, but maybe, be directed into 15-Minute Smart Cities? Oh, and also another reason to not own a home — "mortgages have become the primary means of American middle-class wealth creation". What’s wrong with that? According to Salmon, "The principal amount outstanding on a mortgage slowly declines over time, even as the value of the home (generally) goes up. The result, if everything goes according to plan, is ever-greater home equity, and therefore wealth."

Uh, isn’t this still America, where freedom, property rights, and free-market capitalism are guiding principles?

So what does Salmon see as wrong with us owning homes? First, "the 36% of households in the middle quintile who don’t own their home at all, and for whom home equity is therefore 0% of their net worth." Good grief, some people don’t want to own a home and have the responsibility of keeping it up. Yes, there are those (not in the middle quintile {unless they live in the very expensive cities}) who can’t afford to buy a home.
Posted by:Besoeker

#8  I am not sure about whether I got death insurance. What happens after I die is low on my list of priorities.
Posted by: Super Hose   2023-09-09 15:04  

#7  "Property is theft!" (French: La propriété, c'est le vol!)--French anarchist Pierre-Joseph Proudhon(1840)...
...But if you can't own things how can you claim to own yourself?
Posted by: magpie   2023-09-09 14:52  

#6  Am I still part of the problem?

Did you get 'death payoff' insurance with the mortgage?
Posted by: Skidmark   2023-09-09 11:10  

#5  Should unmarried couples ever buy a house together? Experts warn it could be a costly mistake, as record numbers get on property ladder BEFORE tying the knot
Posted by: Skidmark   2023-09-09 11:08  

#4  What if I am just making mortage payments that will go on longer than actuaries think I will live. Am I still part of the problem?
Posted by: Super Hose   2023-09-09 10:53  

#3  As amply demonstrated on a daily basis, the left is hardly the bastion of 'morality'.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2023-09-09 08:25  

#2  I'm willing to be as evil as they claim me to be.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2023-09-09 07:16  

#1  "You will own nothing and be happy."

You'll own nothing and be happy is a phrase originated by Danish Politician Ida Auken in a 2016 essay for the World Economic Forum. After appearing in a WEF video in 2016, the phrase began to be used by critics who accuse the WEF of desiring restrictions on ownership of private property. Wikipedia
Posted by: Besoeker   2023-09-09 06:00  

00:00