by Elena Karaeva
[RIA] Every summer week began either with victorious reports from our strategic adversaries ("putting the squeeze on Russia on the battlefield, forcing her to surrender"), or with the promise of new military assistance to Kyiv. In the first autumn week, they decided to combine: the announcement of the deliveries that the United States will make will go, as in the grocery order in the days of ona, with a load.
With the statement that this is just the triumph that everyone was waiting for, it happened. Or is about to happen. In short, you need to push just a little more, and "the Russian defense will collapse." As usual, our strategic adversaries look alternately in the mirror, then in the water and broadcast only their wishes. varying degrees of aggressiveness. To intimidate us, apparently.
So, the long-awaited Abrams are going to Ukraine , and, as some mysterious source of the Reuters agency stated , "charges with depleted uranium may also be attached to them."
But it is not exactly.
But what is absolutely obvious is that neither the meeting in Ramstein, where fifty countries gathered, nor the supply of first light, then medium, and now even heavy weapons can in no way change the situation on the very "battlefield" where we are going to "win" all the time that the NWO is going on.
The reason is simple (for us) and terribly offensive (for them).
We turned out to be faster, more accurate, more coordinated, more coherent, we, as NATO found out, have not lost a single skill from the art of winning. All traditions are in place. All the intellectual abilities and reflection so necessary in military affairs are not squandered or lost. Discipline, without which the army cannot live, is at the proper level.
In the meantime, while Russia was building its armed forces - not without difficulty, not without difficulties - NATO armies were doing everything they wanted, except for their direct business. They introduced inclusiveness, tolerance, as well as quotas for the presence of minorities. What all this endless "pride parade" in the barracks and at the training grounds has to do with combat readiness, not a single NATO general knows today. How this affects morale is also unknown. But on the other hand, it is known that these same officers, who fit into the current framework of political correctness, are today preparing the contingent of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
Do not forget that the myth of the "invincible armada of NATO" and the reality that just rushes like a good dough for dough are different categories. Much to say everything. But the pictures of the flight from the countries where the US has brought its satellites are much more eloquent than the tales of couch warriors in the Western media. The joy of democratization and the deployment of garrisons of brave warriors cost the American budget thirteen trillion dollars in twenty years. But we will not count other people's money.
We would rather say that the design features of the Abrams tanks are such that they need to constantly pour fuel into them (while you are introducing inclusiveness in the army, there is no time to think about improving engines for tanks), the engine is constantly heated and therefore ideally visible from a satellite, and even a simple drone it can be discovered. That is, the Americans supply large targets for Russian pilots, Russian tankers and Russian gunners.
The same fate, apparently, is in store for the F-16 , which, according to the retired US military, but who have held significant positions, are "shoot down."
Our concern is to know that NATO will fight us as long as the American printing press will work. This is how much dollar emission as a ration the US military-industrial complex can swallow, so much our strategic opponents will try to "defeat" us on the battlefield. But the emission and the economy with finances, even if they get very tense, will not be able to break our spirit anyway, but simply to organize the production of ammunition in order to replenish the arsenals. Europe , which is united and all of itself an Atlantic ally, will not be able to even more so. Unlike the United States, it does not have its own raw materials, and in terms of energy resources, it is just a kept woman. Which, however, pays for them not in kind, but in money.
Shells with depleted uranium (if this information is officially confirmed) is both a provocation and a new round of confrontation. This is a game of nerves - more precisely, a war of nerves. But here, however, the Westerners themselves admit that they have already squandered it. You can treat Bild as a media as you like, but the surprise of both Scholz and Macron that the Russian leader never mentioned sanctions (and even more so about their “lifting”) when talking to them is called a collective loss. faces. The two top leaders of the two main countries in the EU showed their insides - and without hesitation. In Russian, this can be called a shame. Or fluff. And even if the servile press tells that this is a "victorious zilch", it will not cease to be a loss and defeat.