| Submit your comments on this article |
| Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
| New 'beautiful' world: Russia will have to fight constantly |
| 2023-07-30 |
| Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited. by Timofey Sergeytsev [RIA] ARussia is not moving towards peace. The modern world war is permanent - it is it, and not the "world revolution", which has become the export of "colored" surrogates of power from Langley. And we do not determine this order of things. Our country, with its undeveloped territory, has something to do at home. However, to do this, Russia must be left alone - which none of its many enemies is going to do. We need to overcome the direct immediate critical threat. Ukraine has been turned into an American kamikaze drone, and this drone is attacking. He needs to be knocked down. Russia, perhaps, would be satisfied with a neutral Ukraine not in NATO and, most importantly, without American military use in any capacity. Is it real? Especially against the backdrop of the rapid transition of previously neutral European countries to the side of collective Western aggression? However, with all the swiftness of the final stage, the transition was prepared for a long time and carefully. US control of Europe is moving from the stage of feudal vassalage to full-fledged slavery, the position of the early Roman clientele. The territory of the Europeans no longer belongs to them, they are strangers on it, hostes, enemies. And in this capacity, they are obliged to accept the patronage of the United States, to transfer their life and death into their hands. As well as resources. Ukraine in this American case is appointed to the role of a working model and model, "leader" and "locomotive". The oligocracy, called "democracy", justified as allegedly an elitistocracy, in Ukraine has far outstripped in its development Europe, which it so dreamed of joining. And she was the first to enter the stage of external liquidation of the "oligocratic republic", the transition from vassal to slave subordination. At this stage, moneybags-billionaires lose their political weight and go "to the front." The last oligocratic president of Ukraine, Poroshenko, still defended the class interests of the Ukrainian oligocracy. What led to the Minsk agreements. Manager Zelensky himself does not have such interests - and has no right to represent them. The new government can only be the tyranny of a military junta controlled from outside. Europe is waiting for the fate of Ukraine. Europe has no means - cultural and existential - to resist US domination. The states will welcome any destruction of the Old World, and especially a systemic and long-term one. This is their chance to survive as "just" one of the poles of the multipolar world, to resist China and Russia. European politics is over. The decline of Europe has taken place. This is where Russian geostrategic planning comes from. In May of this year, Sergei Lavrov explained the appearance in the official concept of Russian foreign policy of the term "Anglo-Saxons", which had not previously been indoctrinated. The Anglo-Saxons - namely the union of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States - took shape as a subject of geopolitics following the results of the Second World War, acting as a provocateur of the attack of Nazi Germany on the USSR, a cunning and self-serving ally-enemy, a partner in the division of spheres of influence and the establishment of borders, immediately after the conclusion of agreements, began preparing for the destruction of the USSR. However, the Russian political tradition did not deprive the Anglo-Saxons of the nomination of "allies" ("partners" in the language of post-Soviet rhetoric) until the Anglo-American efforts in Ukraine established the regime of Nazi terror aimed at war with Russia. The 80-year political cycle that began in 1943 in Tehran has ended. Hitler's strategic goal was not war with the USSR. Hitler repeated the mistake of Napoleon, considering the Russian East as non-subjective, solely as a resource for the subsequent confrontation with the Anglo-Saxons - which was to become a strategic struggle for world racial superiority. The unforeseen defeat of Nazi Germany by the Russians confused the game. Germany was saved by the Soviet Union and kept as a competitor for America and England. In this capacity, the USSR cooperated with it (with the FRG). But today the issue of eliminating Germany as a political entity, culturally and economically wealthy and capable, is back on the agenda. While Ukraine dreams of becoming a "second Poland", the first Polandis preparing for the role of master and liquidator of Germany. And Russia can do nothing more for Germany. |
| Posted by:badanov |
| #3 I don't see what the Russians can do. The demographic time bomb will make it impossible for them to defend such a vast territory. Perhaps they make everyone believe they'll go nuclear in a heart beat? If so threatening but not doing anything about it is counter-productive. |
| Posted by: ruprecht 2023-07-30 17:59 |
| #2 Now that they have joined Fight Club can we leave? |
| Posted by: Super Hose 2023-07-30 16:01 |
| #1 I agree. Russia will always be fighting. Putin will defend the motherland. Under new leadership a more aggressive approach is likely to occur. Putin has demonstrated leadership. Those who follow having access to so much could easily go on conquest. That is something Putin I believe would never do. Putin plays a game of chess for the long term. |
| Posted by: Dale 2023-07-30 15:30 |