You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
Pentagon accounting error overvalued Ukraine weapons aid by $3 billion
2023-05-19
On one hand, a comfort. On the other hand, not comforting at all.
[Reuters] The Pentagon overestimated the value of the ammunition, missiles and other equipment it sent to Ukraine by around $3 billion, a Senate aide and a defense official said on Thursday, an error that may lead the way for more weapons being sent to Kyiv for its defense against Russian forces.

The error was the result of assigning a higher than warranted value on weaponry that was taken from U.S. stocks and then shipped to Ukraine, two senior defense officials said on Thursday.

"We've discovered inconsistencies in how we value the equipment that we've given" to Ukraine one of the senior defense officials told Reuters. The officials and the Senate aide spoke on the condition of anonymity. Congress is being notified of the accounting adjustment on Thursday, the sources said.

The defense official said it is possible the amount of overvalued weaponry could grow beyond $3 billion as the Pentagon examines the situation more thoroughly.

In its accounting, the Pentagon used replacement cost to value the weapons aid, instead of the weaponry's value when it was purchased and depreciated, the senior defense officials said.

Since August 2021, the United States has sent weapons valued at about $21.1 billion to Ukraine from its stockpiles.
Posted by:Enver Slager8035

#7  Ghanaian officials believe $3B IMF loan will ‘reset’ economy, ease hardship
Posted by: Skidmark   2023-05-19 23:57  

#6  Oh, that money went somewhere.

Yes, to the Pentagon's procurement budget. Therefore there is an incentive to value old, even obsolete, weapons with the value of new weapons.

What is the value of MRAPs? The cost when purchased was $700,000 - $1 million. The US couldn't give them away before the war? The Pentagon also won't be buying any new ones so there is no real replacement cost to attach to the old equipment.

In its accounting, the Pentagon used replacement cost to value the weapons aid, instead of the weaponry's value when it was purchased and depreciated, the senior defense officials said.

This is likely the fairest way to value the equipment. Like a business depreciating equipment. Even then, the Pentagon is transferring a lot of equipment that has been in storage for decades and would have been scrapped.
Posted by: Enver Slager8035   2023-05-19 14:19  

#5  As I said on Twitter, try that with your taxes.
Posted by: mossomo   2023-05-19 13:03  

#4  Just when I think the unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats can't get any more moronic.
Posted by: DarthVader   2023-05-19 10:28  

#3  Early markdowns for the Memorial Day Sales
Posted by: Frank G   2023-05-19 10:04  

#2  Poss to the F-16 buyer's aid fund.
A 'look ahead' budgeted allocation.
Posted by: Skidmark   2023-05-19 09:41  

#1  ....Oh, that money went somewhere.

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2023-05-19 05:00  

00:00