You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
Recent, rapid ocean warming ahead of El Niño alarms scientists
2023-04-26
[BBC] A recent, rapid heating of the world's oceans has alarmed scientists concerned that it will add to global warming.

This month, the global sea surface hit a new record high temperature. It has never warmed this much, this quickly.

Scientists don't fully understand why this has happened.

But they worry that, combined with other weather events, the world's temperature could reach a concerning new level by the end of next year.

Experts believe that a strong El Niño weather event - a weather system that heats the ocean - will also set in over the next months.

Warmer oceans can kill off marine life, lead to more extreme weather and raise sea levels. They are also less efficient at absorbing planet-warming greenhouse gases.

An important new study, published last week with little fanfare, highlights a worrying development.
The article links to the study, which has a reeeely long list of co-authors and starts with an abstract full of assumptions about data accumulated since 1971. The first problem of which, it seems to me, is that in 1971 they were measuring in far fewer spots on the planet than they are now — or so I have read elsewhere.
Over the past 15 years, the Earth has accumulated almost as much heat as it did in the previous 45 years, with most of the extra energy going into the oceans.

This is having real world consequences - not only did the overall temperature of the oceans hit a new record in April this year, in some regions the difference from the long term was enormous.

In March, sea surface temperatures off the east coast of North America were as much as 13.8C higher than the 1981-2011 average.
And elsewhere?
Another important factor that is worrying scientists is the weather phenomenon known as the El Niño Southern Oscillation.

For the past three years this naturally occurring event has been in a cooler phase called La Niña, and has helped keep global temperatures in check.

But researchers now believe that a strong El Niño is forming which will have significant implications for the world.

"The Australian Bureau's model does go strongly for a strong El Niño. And it has been trending that way and all the climate models have been trending that way to a stronger event," said Hugh McDowell from Australia's Bureau of Meteorology.
Ah yes, models. Which have proved poor at predicting thus far....
Mr McDowell cautioned that predictions at this point of the year are less reliable. Other researchers are more bullish.

A coastal El Niño has already developed off the shores of Peru and Ecuador and experts believe a fully formed event will follow with implications for global temperatures.

"If a new El Niño new comes on top of it, we will probably have additional global warming of 0.2-0.25C," said Dr Josef Ludescher, from the Potsdam Institute for Climate Research.
If and probably — words to help you sleep more soundly at night, dear Reader.
Posted by:Skidmark

#19  ^ Easy! NASA GISS says the “normal” temperature of the Earth is assumed to be 57.2°F".
Link to discussion of temperature anomaly which looks scary vs actual temperature
Posted by: SteveS   2023-04-26 20:48  

#18  Verlaine: I didn't know you were here in SD.

Abu - March was "coldest in 90 years" per the UT. My daily experience in a Kubota construction 4x without windows/doors seemed to confirm that
Posted by: Frank G   2023-04-26 19:34  

#17  I have never met, nor do I ever expect to meet, the climate cultist who can honestly and straightforwardly answer the question: "What would be the appropriate temperature?"
Posted by: M. Murcek   2023-04-26 18:11  

#16  OMG...weather!
Posted by: Rex Mundi   2023-04-26 17:24  

#15  Gerbil worming is religion for people who don't believe in God.

Lots of them about, these days...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2023-04-26 17:23  

#14  Well San Diego was the "coolest" and wettest I've ever seen. Which, if I had lived for 450M years so far, *might* be statistically significant - but probably not.

But anyway it was more than double the annual rainfall average (which has been tracked since waaaay back in ..... early 20th century?

This entire climate thing is the, or among, top actual threat to freedom and prosperity. It already exacts a tremendous tax on societies indulging the lysenkoism. It's sort of amazing, and terrifying: this is 1,000 times more important than even the "big" issues discussed by political figures, and yet there is basically silence, on the adult/rational/scientific side (in the political sphere).
Posted by: Verlaine   2023-04-26 17:11  

#13  Considering we just came out of a longer and colder than usual La Nina, this isn't very surprising.
Posted by: DarthVader   2023-04-26 16:42  

#12  This winter in San Diego County is not the coldest I can remember but it was frickin' cold.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2023-04-26 12:22  

#11  This particular La Nina lasted three years. The first time that has happened since comparable records have been kept.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2023-04-26 10:33  

#10  Consider this Semi-Joking fact.

The Human Population Growth may be the problem.

The average human body typically radiates around 100W to 110W of heat. With Females radiating more heat at certain stages of life (☺) .

With a 8.029, Billion human population estimated as of 4-26-2023 @ 9:34 EST. That works out to about 802.9 Billion watts of heat emitted every living second.

In 1953 the population was about 2.677 Billion. Since 1953 (70 years ago) humans population alone is emitting 199.88% MORE heat. Could the human population, itself, be a major part of the issue?

Since LSD's seem to be the most heated on so many issues.
Should the LSD population be trimmed to protect the environment? ☺ Maybe setting Street Suicide Booths in SF, LA, NYC, Chicago, Portland and Seattle may be the solution.☺
Posted by: NN2N1   2023-04-26 09:57  

#9  #6 cooler phase called La Niña, and has helped keep global temperatures in check...
It was some decades ago, but as I recall the change from Nino to Nina led to the demise of the extensive anchovy fishery along the Peruvian coast. Historicslly, the fluctuations seem episodic and unpredictable.
Posted by: Slavising Unineting5672   2023-04-26 09:55  

#8  And if it keeps rising at the up to 1 deg C per year it will boil away by the end of the century!!!
Posted by: Glenmore    2023-04-26 08:40  

#7  US in longest streak of no EF5 tornadoes ever
Posted by: M. Murcek   2023-04-26 07:52  

#6  cooler phase called La Niña, and has helped keep global temperatures in check.

So the naturally occurring cycle has helped keep climate change 'in check', except when the cycle went the other way.

I think I got it now.
Posted by: Bobby   2023-04-26 07:24  

#5  BTW: Given the SCIENCE agrees that Volcanos cause disruptions in the Earth Climate patterns.

How many major Volcano eruptions did the Earth have in just 2022 that were in areas that would have effected the Ocean Temps?

PLUS, How many 2023 & Ocean Floor events also?

Posted by: NN2N1   2023-04-26 07:20  

#4  Here are the 50 times the Earth Climate Pimps were WRONG... But made a lot of $$$$$$ in the process.
Posted by: NN2N1   2023-04-26 07:10  

#3  What's that word? Oh, yeah..

Cyclical
Posted by: Frank G   2023-04-26 06:30  

#2  Those of us enjoying "The Spring That Wasn't" can only applaud the idea of global warming.
Posted by: Mercutio   2023-04-26 06:05  

#1  I had just learned the Pacific was having historically lows. Satellite sensors had recorded these lows for which they could not understand.
Posted by: Dale   2023-04-26 03:36  

00:00