You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Short Attention Span Theater-
Would YOUR neighborhood be targeted in a nuclear conflict? Official map shows the 2,000 locations across the US most at risk
2023-02-09
[Daily Mail, where America gets its news]
  • Heavily populated cities such as New York and L.A. would be primary targets - but more rural areas also at risk

  • Idaho, Maine, parts of northern California and Oregon are 'safe' zones, according to FEMA hotspot map of US

  • READ MORE: US stocks up on $300m worth of radiation sickness drug

These are the nuclear 'hotspots' across America that could be targeted in the event of a thermonuclear war, according to the government.

While heavily populated cities like New York and Los Angeles may seem like the most likely US targets, there are other, more strategic targets in states such as Montana or North Dakota to wipe out the US's retaliatory forces.

The US Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) originally released the map of the areas most likely to be targeted in 2015
Oh?
- but it has resurfaced on social media again as the West teeters on the brink of conflict with Russia over its invasion of Ukraine.
Ah. I wondered.
The map shows potential targets in every state, with dense clusters along the eastern seaboard and in California. Particularly large clusters are also highlighted in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, and Wyoming.

Active nuclear power plants are large targets. There are around 90 active nuclear plants in the United States, including plants in Alabama, Arizona, Maryland, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Tennessee.

On the other hand, if you are looking for a 'safe' place to live, consider parts of Idaho, Maine, northern California, and Oregon, where the lack of nuclear plants and more sparse populations make them less likely targets.

The US has strategically positioned nuclear forces, which could be prime nuclear targets, far from population centers. There are ICBM (intercontinental ballistic missile silos), naval and air force bases, and nuclear storage depots scattered across the country.

Irwin Redlener, a public-health expert at Columbia University who specializes in disaster preparedness, says there are six US cities that are the most likely targets of a nuclear attack. New York, Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Washington, DC are prime targets, not only because of their dense populations but because of critical infrastructure such as financial centers, government buildings, and energy plants. Other cities and metro areas that could be likely targets include Chicago, Dallas-Fort Worth, Los Angeles, Miami, Philadelphia, and San Francisco.
Posted by:Skidmark

#11  Idaho in the sweet zone.
Posted by: Rex Mundi   2023-02-09 20:26  

#10  A little blowby from hitting LM in Ft. Worth.
Dallas they can have. Prevailing summer winds will take the cloud north into the Choctaw/Chickasaw/Cherokee nations. Winter winds, Austin and Houston, so no great loss.
Posted by: Skidmark   2023-02-09 18:18  

#9  For some reason I can’t see the article- freezes my screen. How do we look, Skidmark?
Posted by: Glenmore    2023-02-09 15:03  

#8  Here on the Space Coast, Patrick SFB and KSC guarantee a hot time.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2023-02-09 14:32  

#7  Like NN21, it was 20 miles as the crow flies to the center of a major USAF base. About 25 to major transcontinental rail and interstate highway bridges plus the state capitol. A different era.
Posted by: magpie   2023-02-09 14:31  

#6  Looks like my neighborhood is good, so we can continue to sabotage infrastructure and shovel armaments into the war zone. If they start targeting Dollar Tree locations, I am going to be more of an advocate for a negotiated settlement, especially if Circle K locations become part of the attack algorithm.
Posted by: Super Hose   2023-02-09 12:48  

#5  Who here remembers the Pentagon Ground Zero Hot Dog Stand and its world class chili-dog?
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2023-02-09 12:36  

#4  I know. You'd think with this current government an adversary would want to leave DC functional for maximum damage.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2023-02-09 11:37  

#3  ..not as much bio-hazard materials to burn through. In DC its rhetorical rather than literal.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2023-02-09 09:04  

#2  I notice that Los Angeles, Chicago, and San Francisco would be targeted twice. But DC only once?
Posted by: Bobby   2023-02-09 08:25  

#1  
Like many here, on Rantburg.
I have lived and/or worked in or around Primary or immediate secondary strike zones most of my life.

Would rather go quick, then wait a few weeks for the few 100 rad of exposure to work its magic.


Posted by: NN2N1   2023-02-09 05:12  

00:00