Submit your comments on this article |
-Great Cultural Revolution |
Of a survey of 29 of the largest legacy news sources of record from around the world about arguably the biggest story of alleged corruption (and possibly even sedition) by the US government, 7 mentioned it at all and 22 ignored it completely. |
2022-12-05 |
[SaidIt] This is a "day after" overview of which legacy news orgs think that the first Twitter Files drop can be considered "news". Given that this alleges collusion between Twitter and the Biden campaign to sway the 2020 US election, as well as collusion on other things with the Trump government, it is interesting to see who is and who is not willing to whack the hornet's nest of government. It's now 10 AM EDT, over 15 hours after the files dropped. This is ample time for a hot news story to hit the front pages of any news organization. My methodology is to go to each news site's front page and search for "Twitter". Let's begin: US NEWS SOURCES
CANADIAN NEWS SOURCES (because I'm from Canada, that's why.)
It should be noted that all major legacy press sources in Canada started taking Federal government funding starting in 2018. While I understand that it's hard to run a newspaper these days, this is a clear conflict of interest when it comes to the news sources reporting on anything that might be in the public interest, but that the gov't might prefer not to highlight. CBC is our public broadcaster and has been fully gov't funded since its inception in 1952. UK NEWS SOURCES
OTHER INTERNATIONAL NEWS SOURCES OF RECORD
|
Posted by:Spike the Hairy6811 |
#6 /\ Twitter had many helpers. They must all be dug up and disposed of before 2024. |
Posted by: Besoeker 2022-12-05 17:09 |
#5 This would be a good time to blame Twitter for foisting the destructive Biden upon the world. The left must be confident they can steel 2024 without the news blackout of DEM corruption. |
Posted by: ruprecht 2022-12-05 16:57 |
#4 A high information conservative voter has already tuned out both MSM and social media other to look at either and be reminded it's all dreck, tripe, bunk, etc. |
Posted by: M. Murcek 2022-12-05 16:22 |
#3 Here is all the article says about Twitter: The Times of Israel, clearly taking up the story from American newsfeeds, pretty much quotes that verbatim — with the same interpretation. Low information voters on the right will cheer on the claimed position, low info. voters on the left will use it to buttress their hatred of all things Trump, while high info. voters on the left will nod approvingly at the old Twitter behaving righteously. The only ones to object will be the high-knowledge group on the right, who’ll know better than to believe the traditional media’s take on the story. Instapundit has the original post here. |
Posted by: trailing wife 2022-12-05 16:08 |
#2 NYTimes had something in today's print. In the back pages. Somewhat abbreviated. |
Posted by: lord garth 2022-12-05 14:59 |
#1 I told you people that MSM would not cover this story. The sad fact is, I know lots of people who won't believe that Twitter censored the most important story of 2020 until mainstream media outlets come clean. Dunno what it will take for that to happen. It's no good trying to talk to them. Here's what CBS is saying this morning: Trump claims grounds for "termination" of U.S. Constitution Here is all the article says about Twitter: Trump's latest comments, issued Saturday in a post on his "Truth Social" media platform, came in response to a report by journalist Matt Taibbi that showed Twitter employees deliberating in October 2020 about how to handle a New York Post article about a laptop belonging to President Biden's son Hunter Biden. Taibbi reported that both the Biden campaign and the Trump White House had communicated with Twitter about content on the platform. |
Posted by: Abu Uluque 2022-12-05 11:52 |