You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Olde Tyme Religion
UK Govt Prosecutors Argue Parts of Bible 'No Longer Appropriate in Modern Society'
2022-11-30
[BREITBART] Lawyers for the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) of England and Wales tried to have a Christian street preacher convicted for quoting the Bible to a lesbian couple, insisting that scripture is "no longer appropriate in modern society ".

The extraordinary case, mounted in what is still nominally a Christian church, with an established church in which the head of state serves as Supreme Governor, was brought against armed forces veteran and throat cancer survivor John Dunn, after the police referred him to prosecutors for telling a lesbian couple that it "says in the Bible that homosexuals will not inherit the kingdom of God" in Swindon.

"Whether a statement of Christian belief or not, the court is being asked to consider whether the language has the potential to cause harassment, alarm or distress," the CPS wrote to the courts when pursuing the case, in a document quoted by the Belfast News Letter.

"This document is not the forum for religious debate, but the bible contains other material recognising slavery (Exodus 21:7), the death sentence
...the barbaric practice of sentencing a murderer to be punished for as long as his/her/its victim is dead...
(Exodus 35:2 and Leviticus 24:16) and cannibalism (Deuteronomy 28:27)," the prosecutors asserted — sloppily, as it turns out, as Deuteronomy 28:27 actually makes no reference to cannibalism.

"There are references in the bible which are simply no longer appropriate in modern society and which would be deemed offensive if stated in public," the CPS insisted.
Posted by:Fred

#9  You could same the same thing about any set of laws. But which parts?
Posted by: magpie   2022-11-30 20:49  

#8  I understand the whole (sp?) Job and his daughters thing is being socialized.
Posted by: Skidmark   2022-11-30 17:48  

#7  As I understand the so-called Defense of Marriage Act, it willbe illegal for churches to refuse to perform same sex marriages, or at least the refused couple would be able to sue. And they would win. There is no religious exemption from this act. Given the current Supreme Court, I hold little hope that the law will be struck down on 1st amendment grounds.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia    2022-11-30 16:10  

#6  Same legal arguments coming to you soon NY and CA.
Posted by: The Walking Unvaxed   2022-11-30 06:44  

#5  The word "modern" is not being use appropriately here.
A more appropriate word for "modern" that matches reality in describing some parts of English society would be something like "degenerate" (society) or "decadent" (society).
I am very thankful my ancestors immigrated from Europe long ago for a better life in the USA.
I would like to remind my brothers in England that they would be speaking German or Russian or Japanese if it were not for the blood of some brave Americans who believed in scripture as the word of God.
It is unfortunate that some Americans have become "modern", like the 12 Republicans who just voted with all 50 Democrats to force same sex marriage on the whole country.
Posted by: boomerc   2022-11-30 06:32  

#4  Agree! The human experience, either good or bad, predates the written word. The Bible is not the problem. "Modern Society" is the problem.
Posted by: Besoeker   2022-11-30 02:28  

#3  ^ Ha ha , yes.
Posted by: Dron66046   2022-11-30 02:25  

#2  It would be better to say that parts of modern society have no place in the Bible.
Posted by: Matt   2022-11-30 01:32  

#1  Now say that about the Koran. You won't, cuz you a coward.
Posted by: DarthVader   2022-11-30 00:31  

00:00