| Submit your comments on this article |
| Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
| UAV and grain in the Black Sea: The enemy will answer for Sevastopol! |
| 2022-10-30 |
| Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited by Platon Besedin [REGNUM] The enemy will answer for attempts to disturb Sevastopol and Crimea. Already answers. "At least don’t go to bed," a neighbor told me when Sevastopol was shaken by the events of the morning. You probably already know about them. In the early morning of October 29, the Kyiv regime launched what was probably the most massive attack on the hero city. In particular, we are talking about the fact that nine unmanned aerial vehicles and seven autonomous marine drones were involved. This disgrace was coordinated by Western structures. First of all, the British. We are talking about the fact that drones were aimed at objects with the help of Global Hawk. It is important to understand here that everyone, in fact, in this situation solves his own problems. The Kyiv regime wants to harm Russia. And Western structures are testing their weapons. They want to understand what effect such attacks can have. And can they, in principle, because the Kyiv regime requires more and more investments from Western forces. But how justified is this? The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation reported that the attacks of enemy drones were repulsed - mainly from the ships of the Black Sea Fleet. It is further stated that "the sea minesweeper Ivan Golubets, as well as the bonnet barrier in Yuzhnaya Bay, received minor damage." At the same time, the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation openly stated that British specialists were responsible for the attacks: they were preparing. All this, of course, is a direct escalation of the conflict. The hero of Viktor Sukhorukov in the film "Brother-2", finishing off the Bandera, said: "You will answer me for Sevastopol!" As the events of 2014, the events of the Russian Spring, showed in the future, the enemy really had to answer. Now, after the attack on the Crimean bridge, after the invasion of drones, the Kyiv regime must be punished as severely as possible. So that he would not even think of disturbing the Sevastopol and Crimeans. By the way, about the latter. Last night, October 28, walking around the center of Sevastopol, we discussed that, yes, they say, we live in a front-line city, but this is not particularly felt. Sometimes glass breaks, sometimes air defense works, but calmness is everywhere, and most people treat what is happening as a routine, which, in general, like it or not, but definitely you need to get used to it. Another question is that even in this state of affairs there is duality. Here we are talking about hero warriors undergoing treatment in the Sevastopol hospital, about their injuries, wounds, and next to them, the peasants who refueled at the local alcohol market are laughing, having fun nearby. Of course, this does not mean that life should stagnate, freeze, that, in principle, it should be mothballed in sadness, no - however, we all must be aware of the essence of what is happening and bear responsibility. One of the facets of this responsibility is the implementation of simple safety rules. First of all, in the context of psychological, moral hygiene. After all, the enemy is counting not even on a military, but on an information attack. "Victories" are invented and presented as real, so why help the enemy in this? Meanwhile, regarding the events in Sevastopol, some bloggers spread utter nonsense on social networks - passing off, for example, burning tires as the consequences of UAV strikes. At the same time, what is important, the local authorities (and not only in Sevastopol) have repeatedly asked not to publish the locations of enemy strikes. And even more so, do not produce fakes. They talked and talked - but not everyone listened and heard ... Well, now appropriate measures will be officially taken (preventive conversations, banning access to video cameras, etc.) against such "information bombs" - which is logically announced by Governor Mikhail Razvozhaev . Yuri Trifonov once wrote that the new type of terrorism must first of all be deprived of publicity. And it's hard to disagree with that. Indeed, in pursuit of hype, many today are pedaling “gloomy plots”, behind which sometimes there is actually nothing real. So why produce inventions and help the enemy? Information hygiene is what is primary today. Especially in front-line cities. When some do not multiply the unnecessary, while others inform the population in time, then we can talk about integral information security, which, in turn, gives rise to the integrity of society. Well, military attacks will be repulsed - and the enemy, of course, will be punished. The first decision in this context has already been made: Moscow suspends participation in the implementation of the “grain deal”. Further more. The enemy will answer for attempts to disturb Sevastopol and Crimea. Already answers. |
| Posted by:badanov |
| #1 Attacking civilian buildings and infrastructure is perfectly fine activity when you are attacking your enemies, (though that violates international law), but even what you describe as failed attacks on military targets in Sevastopol are outrageous evil. Perhaps the authors should learn about the golden rule. |
| Posted by: i forgot it 2022-10-30 00:59 |