Submit your comments on this article | |
-Lurid Crime Tales- | |
Hundreds of FBI employees investigated for sexual misconduct quit before being disciplined: report | |
2022-10-07 | |
![]() Sen. Chuck Grassley, the top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, sent a letter Thursday to Attorney General Merrick Garland after whistleblowers saying hundreds of FBI employees who were investigated for sexual misconduct quit before being disciplined. The whistleblowers provided Grassley with an internal Justice Department memo, titled "Retirements and Resignations During Unwelcome Sexual Conduct Adjudications." The document showed that from 2004 to 2020, over 660 FBI employees, including 45 top-level officials, retired or resigned after an internal probe into alleged misconduct but before receiving a final disciplinary letter.
Grassley also said he received another department document, titled "Inconsistent Adjudication of Non-Consensual Sexual Misconduct." The document showed that higher-ranked FBI employees are "more likely to have their sexual misconduct case adjudicated" and are "subjected to lesser penalties" than lower-ranked employees. "Simply put, these two documents show a systemic failure within the Justice Department and FBI to protect female employees from sexual harassment and sexual misconduct in the workplace and a failure to sufficiently punish employees for that same misconduct," Grassley wrote in the letter that was also addressed to FBI Director Christopher Wray. The Iowa senator also asked for more data from the Justice Department so that he could better understand what changes, if any, have been made to address the issues in the FBI. | |
Posted by:Skidmark |
#4 ^ What I thought. How many of these are good guys slandered by some rainbow diversity bitch to make way for the new? |
Posted by: Dron66046 2022-10-07 14:07 |
#3 Could this also be a way of silencing or removing 'rank and file' agents who are not aligned with leadership philosophies? |
Posted by: Glatch Thud2820 2022-10-07 07:54 |
#2 ..."more likely to have their sexual misconduct case adjudicated" and are "subjected to lesser penalties" than lower-ranked employees. So like perps with long arrest records before they're finally prosecuted for doing something really horrendous, so the management at our Stasi. Now we know why they went soft on Hunter. Professional courtesy. |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2022-10-07 07:33 |
#1 ...I'd actually like to know a few other details: - Were these field agents, SACs, or admin/support types? - If FA/SAC, what kind of cases were they handling? - Where were these individuals assigned? Mike |
Posted by: MikeKozlowski 2022-10-07 06:34 |