You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
Northstream II 'Pig Theory' with dozens of comments
2022-10-03
From a comment posted yesterday by our own Mullah Richard.
[LawDog Files] Anyone notice anything interesting about the ruptures at 02:03 hours and 19:03 hours?

Assuming that the map accurately represents the course of the pipelines; and assuming that the map accurately represents the location of the ruptures ... wah-ho, isn’t that interesting, as Dear Old Dad would say?

Even more interesting is this little tidbit, also via email. Russia was having compressor "issues" on Nord 1, enough that the whole sodding compressor station was "shut down" and a "hazardous production facility".

Is anyone else getting the twitchies regarding the fact that at least some of the equipment that keeps the pipeline pressurised was off-line? Just me? Oh, well then. Carry on.

Moving on — multiple sources have confirmed that Nord 2 was full of natural gas; that it was full for at least months; and that said natural gas had never moved.

It. Just. Sat. There. For — allegedly — months.

During normal operations of a pipeline, you run a pig through fairly regularly. A "pig" is a bit of equipment pushed by the gas flow, and as it moves along it shoves water and hydrate slurry down to where it can be removed; and it scrapes compounds off the inside walls (hydrogen sulphide, I’m looking at you) that might be are probably eating your pipe.

Note the part above where the pigs are pushed by the gas. The gas in Nordstream 2 never moved. That means no pig ever went down the line to shove water out, move hydrate slurry, or stop H2S from corroding the steel of the pipeline.

As I said in the previous post — and I will continue to say — none of this rules out intentional Acts of War. There are idiots enough in that region that sabotage can’t be discounted.

How-some-ever ... hydrate plugs.

With that being said, this sudden publicity is really freaking me out, so I’m probably going dark for a few days. I’ve got writing to do, fish to catch, and maybe a deer trail or two to scout.

Y’all have fun.

LawDog
Related:
Nordstream: 2022-10-02 Good Morning
Nordstream: 2022-10-02 The Curious Whodunit of Nordstreams 1 and 2
Nordstream: 2022-10-01 US helicopter flight no proof of sabotage of Nord Stream pipeline
Posted by:Besoeker

#6  Did the leaks fix themselves or did all the gas lingering in the pipe escape?

Also if you shut down the pipe and ran a pig through it, would it push all the gas in the pipeline over to Germany? OR does the pig have some mechanism to allow gas to pass in/around/over it so it doesn't compress things?
Posted by: ruprecht   2022-10-03 21:58  

#5  if the ruptures were caused by inside-the-pipeline explosion, how come the leaks seem to have fixed themselves

actually the same question for sabotage - how do you get a big leak of gas that fixes itself
Posted by: Lord Garth   2022-10-03 19:16  

#4  Remember that odd private plane crash off of the coast of Latvia a weeks ago?
Posted by: DooDahMan   2022-10-03 18:06  

#3  otoh(?): The Nord Stream 2 Pipeline Sabotage
Posted by: Anomalous Sources   2022-10-03 15:44  

#2  MM embrace the power of AND.
Posted by: AlanC   2022-10-03 12:04  

#1  That some people are recoiling from this explanation as they did from the COVID was a lab leak explanation speaks to either a certain predecided frame of mind or to a specific agenda.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2022-10-03 11:01  

00:00