Submit your comments on this article | |
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia | |
Analysis of Russian/Eastern Ukraine Rail lines for Strategy | |
2022-09-19 | |
[Twitter-Tom Warner]
| |
Posted by:3dc |
#7 Don't forget the OSS and their coal torpedoes in WW-II. They learned that from the Confederates. |
Posted by: 3dc 2022-09-19 15:29 |
#6 Yes, The Mighty 8th. |
Posted by: Besoeker 2022-09-19 08:34 |
#5 ^ I think our own 8th Air Force contributed to the lack of readily available rail lift. |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2022-09-19 08:30 |
#4 Patton did without it for the most part as well, relying heavily on his "Cannonball Express." |
Posted by: Besoeker 2022-09-19 08:26 |
#3 Somehow we did without the rail line along to Gulf in Saudi up to Kuwait in the first war. Then again we also had massive a logistic lift that other nations lack. |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2022-09-19 07:50 |
#2 Yes SP, Gen. Sherman had identified this dynamic in '64. |
Posted by: Besoeker 2022-09-19 07:13 |
#1 Some logistics issues are constants. To adequately support a static position of a brigade you need a minimum of one fully functional rail line. The volume of material (POL, ammunition, food & water, etc.) is inefficient to be moved solely by road. A unit in contact / moving forward needs two lines (preferably not parallel). For a basic introduction to logistics see the classic “Supplying War” by van Creveld. |
Posted by: Slenter Panda4300 2022-09-19 06:11 |