You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Land of the Free
CNO Says Once Greatest Seapower Nation In History Cannot Build Three Destroyers A Year
2022-08-31
[USNInews] The biggest barrier to adding more ships to the Navy is industrial base capacity, Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Mike Gilday said Thursday.The service’s top officer said shipbuilders need indicators from the service before they’re able to make the investments required to build, for example, three destroyers per year.

"We have an industrial capacity that’s limited. In other words, we can only get so many ships off the production line a year. My goal would be to optimize those production lines for destroyers, for frigates, for amphibious ships, for the light amphibious ships, for supply ships," Gilday said at a Heritage Foundation event.

"We need to give a signal to industry that we need to get to three destroyers a year, instead of 1.5, that we need to maintain two submarines a year. And so part of this is on us to give them a clear set of — a clear aim point so they can plan a work force and infrastructure that’s going to be able to meet the demand. But again, no industry is going to make those kinds of investments unless we give them a higher degree of confidence."

Asked by USNI News after the event if the reason the Navy isn’t ready to send that signal to industry is because of funding, Gilday said, "it depends on the class of ships. Sometimes it’s affordability. Sometimes it’s industrial capacity."
Related:
Mike Gilday: 2022-02-24 Russian missile cruisers on battle alert face NATO carriers in Mediterranean
Mike Gilday: 2021-04-28 Navy SEALs to shift from counterterrorism to global threats
Mike Gilday: 2020-07-19 Here's what the damage inside the Bonhomme Richard looks like
Posted by:NoMoreBS

#8  Not sure whether they can staff additional ships with recruiting being in the toilet.
Posted by: Super Hose   2022-08-31 12:35  

#7  How China Could Become a Naval Superpower: 6 Aircraft Carriers
Posted by: Skidmark   2022-08-31 10:56  

#6  LST-325 video.
Posted by: Besoeker   2022-08-31 10:47  

#5  ...Unspoken: even a victorious war against a peer opponent could leave the USN crippled for decades.

And Glenmore - the record for a Liberty ship was 4 days, 15 1/2 hours. We couldn't do that again if our lives depended on it.

Mike

Posted by: MikeKozlowski   2022-08-31 10:45  

#4  Gotta love that "service economy" shtick.
Posted by: Mercutio   2022-08-31 09:31  

#3  Liberty ships were crap ships slapped together quickly and even more quickly scrapped the moment the war was over.

Today's Navy ships are handcrafted, gold-plated monuments to the military-industrial complex's love of itself. They cost billions and take years to construct, and that's the way they like it. Ever notice that America has deindustrialized - except for weapons? We still export those everywhere.
Posted by: Sonny de Medici5342   2022-08-31 03:14  

#2  ^^^ I enjoy your direction & thinking friend, but the USA military has a 1930s frame of mind. The world can be crippled by cyber, not guns, bombs, attacks (didn't you learn anything from Afghanistan, and Iraq?) -- drones, small EMPs and "natural petulance" they rule the world/ not big boats
Posted by: Oscar B. Hayes9704   2022-08-31 03:03  

#1  80 years ago we could build a Liberty ship in 6 weeks and had were launching at a rate of 2 per day. I think it was Admiral Raeder who said in 1943 that he knew the war was lost because Anerica was building ships faster than Germany could build torpedoes.
Posted by: Glenmore    2022-08-31 00:44  

00:00