| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| Kansas abortion constitutional amendment rejected by voters |
| 2022-08-04 |
| [FoxNews] |
| Posted by:Skidmark |
| #11 I’ve read that there was a lot of out of state money supporting the pro-abortion side, but I don’t know more than that. I expect a lot of back and forth over this in various states for a while. |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2022-08-04 22:58 |
| #10 *there is a lot of out of state and international business on the I-35 corridor, and they love to shit all over us hick Kansans, so there is a real peer push among those communities to be seen as progressives, especially with social issues, "Oh, I'm not like those Kansans; I just work here." |
| Posted by: swksvolFF 2022-08-04 18:48 |
| #9 The I-35 People were doing some end-zone dancing until they realized this result kind of destroyed The Narrative. And like I said, The Whips going around saying that daughters needed to be raped in order to teach some manners was not a good look. I'd more more accepting of the results had the question been during the general election, and had enough time to make the case instead of only the I-35 media yelling. And it is a constitutional amendment and I"m ok with the process, as it was our state's constitution which kindly instructed the governess to shove her ever loving covid protocols up her cat piss smelling ass. In the meantime, nothing changes, nobody won. |
| Posted by: swksvolFF 2022-08-04 18:33 |
| #8 Re #7: Me too, Tom. Remember the Unborn! |
| Posted by: Mad Eye Elmack7548 2022-08-04 16:47 |
| #7 Yes, it does appear to be the will of the people of Kansas. But I can still mourn for all the babies who will be killed in Kansas in the next few years. |
| Posted by: Tom 2022-08-04 15:38 |
| #6 I'm not putting too much into it other than: () Weirdly timed bill - primary rather than general. () Therefore, low voter turnout () Majority of 'No' voters were Interstate People () Oddly worded () The 'no' voters really showed their ass on election day, one even wishing rape on my daughter to prove a point.* *bout tired of this bosswoman bullshit, no consequence thinking. |
| Posted by: swksvolFF 2022-08-04 11:11 |
| #5 Yes. SCOTUS sent it back to the states. The state legislature should legislate, then let the courts verify the law passes muster. You know, the way the Founders intended. |
| Posted by: M. Murcek 2022-08-04 10:37 |
| #4 It seems the amendment would have given the legislature the right to regulate abortion, and (I suppose) change the regulation every time the legislature changed. I suspect both pro-life and pro-choice groups missed that part. |
| Posted by: Bobby 2022-08-04 10:03 |
| #3 Biden signs order to collect data, cover travel expenses for women seeking abortions |
| Posted by: Skidmark 2022-08-04 09:20 |
| #2 While I am against Abortion On Demand, I have to consider the long range flip side of this. Giving the Gov. /Political types the POWER to decide Personal Moral issues every election, is political fertilizer, for greater social problems down the road to happen. With that said, Kansas already has something on the Legal Books. But it badly needs tweaking, given the advancement in Pregnancy Detection kits in the last 45 years. Now available for under $5 in many a Dollar Stores. |
| Posted by: NN2N1 2022-08-04 06:40 |
| #1 'I hope you get raped': Kansas woman, 37, is charged with assault after 'punching and abusing pro-life activist, 18, who knocked on her door to canvas her vote' |
| Posted by: Skidmark 2022-08-03 14:18 |