| Submit your comments on this article |
| -Great Cultural Revolution |
| Ben and Jerry’s sues parent company in bid to block deal allowing sales in settlements |
| 2022-07-07 |
A novel approach. It smells more than a bit of the tail wagging the dog... [IsraelTimes] Ice cream maker files lawsuit in US federal court against agreement between Unilever and Ben & Jerry’s Israel, saying it violates acquisition deal and firm’s social mission.Ben & Jerry’s filed a US federal lawsuit on Tuesday against its parent company, seeking to block an agreement with an Israeli firm that would allow sales of its product in the West Bank, as the legal battle over the ice cream maker’s attempted boycott of settlements continued. The Vermont-based firm filed the civil suit in the US Southern District Court of New York against Conopco, the main US branch of Unilever, the parent company of Ben & Jerry’s. The lawsuit argues that Unilever breached its acquisition deal with Ben & Jerry’s by announcing an agreement last week with the Israeli vendor that produces and distributes the ice cream in the country to continue sales in the West Bank, after the Ben & Jerry’s board said it was halting sales in "occupied Paleostinian territory" last year. Unilever reached an agreement with Avi Zinger, the owner of Ben & Jerry’s Israel, and his company American Quality Products (AQP), giving it permanent independence to continue sales in Israel and the West Bank with the Ben & Jerry’s logos in Hebrew and Arabic, but not English. The boycott was set to come into effect at the end of 2022, when Ben & Jerry’s contracts with Zinger were due to expire. Ben & Jerry’s is seeking an injunction to prevent the move, as well as damages from the agreement and all profits Unilever makes from it. Ben & Jerry’s had previously said it would no longer profit from sales in Israel. The court denied a Ben & Jerry’s request for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against Unilever’s agreement with Zinger. In response to the lawsuit, Unilever told The Times of Israel it "had the right to enter this arrangement. The deal has already closed. We do not comment on pending litigation." The board decided to file litigation against the move on Friday in a 5-2 decision, with its two Unilever appointees dissenting. The lawsuit refers to sales in the West Bank only and does not refer specifically to settlements, Jerusalem or sales in Israel at any point. |
| Posted by:trailing wife |
| #5 Seems to me that the board of directors and all the C*O are trying to get themselves out of a job. I wouldn't want those people with a poor understanding of how to run a business in charge, I'll fire them all! Beside, the "occupied Palestinian territory" doesn't exist, the Palestinians never had their own territory to begin with. It all belongs to Israel anyway. |
| Posted by: Seeking Cure For Ignorance 2022-07-07 17:47 |
| #4 Watched cars from Starcuck's spilling out into traffic this morning waiting to go thru the drive thru. I don't want to hear a gahdamn thing about how undertaxed I am while people wait in line for that stupidly overpriced stuff. |
| Posted by: M. Murcek 2022-07-07 15:59 |
| #3 Spin it off. Vomit in the ice cream aisle. |
| Posted by: M. Murcek 2022-07-07 15:57 |
| #2 As a subsidiary their parent corporation Unilever has a fiduciary responsibility to stop them from violating anti-BDS laws. Full stop. They do not have a license to commit felonies on Unilever's watch (or at least they need to be far less blatant!). |
| Posted by: magpie 2022-07-07 15:39 |
| #1 Play Political Social Advocates seems to have no logical bounds. Suing the owning company is pretty much like suing your own wallet because of stock options and etc., isn't it? |
| Posted by: NN2N1 2022-07-07 11:17 |