You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Land of the Free
Supreme Court Targets the Real Enemy
2022-07-05
[Epoch Times] The flurry of rulings from the Supreme Court has everyone’s head spinning. The most significant among them, even if it doesn’t capture all the headlines, is West Virginia v. EPA. The majority opinion is impressive, but the part I found truly wonderful is the concurring opinion by Justice Neil Gorsuch.

This is where we see things headed, toward a major and much-welcome curbing of the power of the administrative state.

Just to review what this thing is, it’s an unelected bureaucracy that rules the country without oversight from voters or legislatures. For well over 100 years, most courts have given it a pass, just assuming that the "experts" in the bureaucracies are handling things just fine, faithfully interpreting legislation, and merely creating rules for easy compliance.

Generations have gone by as this fourth branch of government has grown in size, scope, and strength. For the most part, its baneful impositions have been felt by one business or one industry at a time. You have heard the stories. The car dealer complains about how the Department of Labor is making him crazy. The machine-parts manufacturer is going bonkers about letters from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. The energy company can never satisfy the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

They are stories and we find them unfortunate, but we’ve generally avoided thinking of these as systematic, all-pervasive, and truly dangerous to the idea of freedom itself. However, there are some 432 of these agencies. The authors of the Declaration of Independence noted their existence back in the day when they accused the English king of having "erected a Multitude of new Offices, and sent hither Swarms of Officers to harass our People, and eat out their Substance."

They fought a revolution to end the tyranny but now we have a home-grown form, starting in 1883 with the Pendleton Act and continuing throughout the 20th century as each new administration creates its own bureaucracy.

The thing has taken on a power of its own. Strangely, the topic hardly comes up at all during elections, and that’s for a reason. Politicians running for office like to advertise their power to make change. They might even believe it. In reality, though, elected officials have very little influence over the conduct of public life relative to the administrative state.

As Trump found, not even the president is a match for the deep state.

Here’s what has happened since March 2020: The beast showed its face. Seemingly out of nowhere, these strange agencies and people for whom we never voted were ruling our lives. They restricted travel, forced us to cover our faces, closed our churches and schools, and forbid our businesses from operating unless they were big enough to afford a powerful lobbying arm in Washington. The whole scene was appalling. It caused many people—including some earnest judges—to take notice....
Posted by:DooDahMan

#5  Considered a “subject matter expert” by the feds it was a little disconcerting how willing they were to accept “proposed wording” for regs to avoid negative economic impact. Nice that they took my recommendations into consideration but that implied they did the same for other bozos too. Kinda explains in a nutshell the conflicting paragraphs in final issues. The regulators were not only too lazy to write the regs, they were too lazy to proofread them
Posted by: Cloluck Bourbon1058   2022-07-05 18:08  

#4  And no legislation without representation (that includes you, courts of America who want to legislate from the bench).
Posted by: DooDahMan   2022-07-05 13:26  

#3  No regulation without legislation.
Posted by: James   2022-07-05 11:51  

#2  ^ This. The more a person yammers about "democracy," the less interested they actually are in having the public vote on issues affecting their governance.

If everything was decided by binding plebiscite, from declarations of war to who is a dog catcher in the USA, I guarantee you leftists would often hate the results.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2022-07-05 07:46  

#1  
Laws & Reg's should ONLY passed by Elected Representatives, not DC deep pocket appointed officials that always seem to make more than their "official" salary.
Posted by: NN2N1   2022-07-05 07:05  

00:00