You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
Roe v Wade: Done deal.
2022-06-24
Decision was just handed down. Roe v Wade is overturned.
The Wall Street Journal is liveblogging the 6-3 decision. Some articles paywalled — try dropping the headlines into the Google search app to read.

Courtesy of Beavis, to keep all the discussion in one thread:
Supreme Court overturns constitutional right to abortion

[SCOTUSBLOG] The Supreme Court on Friday eliminated the constitutional right to obtain an abortion, casting aside 49 years of precedent that began with Roe v. Wade.

The 6-3 decision by Justice Samuel Alito will set off a seismic shift in reproductive rights across the United States. It will allow states to ban abortion, and experts expect about half the states to do so.

In one of the most anticipated rulings in decades, the court overturned Roe, which first declared a constitutional right to abortion in 1973, and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which re-affirmed that right in 1992. The decision followed the leak in early May of a draft opinion showing that a majority of the justices were privately poised to take that step. On Friday, they made it official.

The decision came in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, a challenge to a Mississippi law, passed in 2018, that bans virtually all abortions after the 15th week of pregnancy. The law carves out exceptions for medical emergencies and cases involving a "severe fetal abnormality" but does not make exceptions for cases involving rape or incest. It has never gone into effect, however, because the lower courts — including the conservative U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit — blocked the state from enforcing the law. [fill in day of week, possessive] decision reversed those rulings and upheld the law.

But by overturning Roe and Casey, the decision also opens the door for states to enact far more dramatic abortion restrictions, including outright bans on the procedure. Mississippi itself has indicated that it will enforce a different state law, passed in 2007, that prohibits virtually all abortions, except to save the life of the mother or in cases involving rape. A dozen other states have passed similar legislation, known as "trigger laws" because they were drafted to go into effect if Roe and Casey were overturned. An analysis by the Guttmacher Institute predicts that 26 states are likely to ban all or nearly all abortions. The Supreme Court on Friday eliminated the constitutional right to obtain an abortion, casting aside 49 years of precedent that began with Roe v. Wade.

The 6-3 decision by Justice Samuel Alito will set off a seismic shift in reproductive rights across the United States. It will allow states to ban abortion, and experts expect about half the states to do so.

In one of the most anticipated rulings in decades, the court overturned Roe, which first declared a constitutional right to abortion in 1973, and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which re-affirmed that right in 1992. The decision followed the leak in early May of a draft opinion showing that a majority of the justices were privately poised to take that step. On Friday, they made it official.

The decision came in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, a challenge to a Mississippi law, passed in 2018, that bans virtually all abortions after the 15th week of pregnancy. The law carves out exceptions for medical emergencies and cases involving a "severe fetal abnormality" but does not make exceptions for cases involving rape or incest. It has never gone into effect, however, because the lower courts — including the conservative U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit — blocked the state from enforcing the law. [fill in day of week, possessive] decision reversed those rulings and upheld the law.

But by overturning Roe and Casey, the decision also opens the door for states to enact far more dramatic abortion restrictions, including outright bans on the procedure. Mississippi itself has indicated that it will enforce a different state law, passed in 2007, that prohibits virtually all abortions, except to save the life of the mother or in cases involving rape. A dozen other states have passed similar legislation, known as "trigger laws" because they were drafted to go into effect if Roe and Casey were overturned. An analysis by the Guttmacher Institute predicts that 26 states are likely to ban all or nearly all abortions
Related:
Roe v. Wade: 2022-06-18 Cornyn bombarded with boos over Senate gun bill at Texas GOP convention
Roe v. Wade: 2022-06-12 AOC hypes her effort to block SCOTUS security bill after Brett Kavanaugh threat
Roe v. Wade: 2022-06-10 Protesters Allowed Outside Justice Brett Kavanaugh's Home After Assassination Threat
Posted by:badanov

#45  I predict Biden will blame Putin for this, too.
Posted by: Omump Grusoque5444   2022-06-24 23:32  

#44  Protesting at the homes of Justices recently didn't help the Dem's causes.
Posted by: Cletle Shinese1880   2022-06-24 21:14  

#43  If "Roberts is being blackmailed by the left" and "Kalorama Kompound" actually runs the country, how did this happen?

Sober up.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2022-06-24 19:10  

#42  I'm always astonished that they can, with a straight face, call the murder of an unborn child 'reproductive rights'.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2022-06-24 18:34  

#41  Tonight, a lot of people who can't even get pregnant are in a funk, thinking "my life is ruined." Those are the people we have to out-vote.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2022-06-24 16:42  

#40  Sounding like some teefer types may self-abort (with a little help) in DC tonight.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2022-06-24 15:56  

#39  For information, from badanov’s WSJ liveblog link:

Four Important Supreme Court Opinions Still to Come

Kennedy v. Bremerton School District

A school district in Washington state says a high-school football coach was improperly using his public employment to promote his religion by kneeling in silent prayer on the 50-yard line after games, with some players coming over to join him. The former coach, Joe Kennedy, said his actions amounted to a protected act of private speech because he played no favorites with the students who participated in the prayer circle.

Biden v. Texas

In this case, the Supreme Court will rule on whether the Biden administration can be compelled to maintain the Trump administration’s Remain in Mexico program, which denied entry to asylum applicants from Central America while their cases were being processed. The Biden administration said the law exposed asylum applicants to unsafe conditions, and that it was pursuing other measures to ease the burden on the immigration system; Missouri and Texas said the government was obliged either to deny entry to these applicants or imprison them within the U.S. until their claims were resolved.

West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency

A coalition of Republican-leaning states and small coal producers argue that EPA’s power to combat greenhouse gases is limited to measures within the fence lines of specific power plants, excluding broader measures the agency says are more effective. The case, argued in February, could lead to new limits on the executive branch’s regulatory power.

Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta

Oklahoma argues it retains concurrent authority on Indian reservations with the federal government to prosecute nontribal citizens even when a crime’s victim is Native American, seeking to reverse one consequence of the Supreme Court’s 2020 decision recognizing nearly half of the state as Indian country. That decision transferred many criminal cases from state courts to federal jurisdiction. Should the court agree with Oklahoma, other states with Indian reservations could find themselves with authority for prosecuting crimes over swaths of territory that for generations have been the U.S. Justice Department’s sole responsibility.
Posted by: trailing wife   2022-06-24 15:39  

#38  now if we can just get some of those GOP politicians who enjoy gracefully losing to realize that gracefully winning is a far better option.
Posted by: ruprecht   2022-06-24 15:28  

#37  Notice they released the concealed carry decision before this one.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2022-06-24 15:15  

#36  They are lying, but much more, they are spotlighting their own ignorance of the document itself and its ramifications.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2022-06-24 15:06  

#35  Could anyone forsee the lies and misinformaton from the leftists and media in the wake of this and the 2nd amendment decision? (sarc)
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2022-06-24 14:57  

#34  Some wag at Last Refuge. We can hope this is correct: The greatest downstream benefit of today's supreme court decision will be to keep the most annoying leftists from moving to red states and regions.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2022-06-24 14:39  

#33  ^ Dammit, I am the "oops, wrong thread" guy this week. Sorry.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2022-06-24 13:55  

#32  You only need to "fix 3-4 states to rig a Presidential election. They will not be able to rig all 50 states in November. What they will do is target some of the newcomers for co-option. Unfortunately, some state GOP organizations are sending people who will be ripe to be blackmailed outright or manipulated because they are weak.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2022-06-24 13:55  

#31  In fact, I'm not even sure these hearings for justice nominees are "required".
Posted by: DooDahMan   2022-06-24 13:52  

#30  And, to clarify, I did think that 7 was specified in the Constitution. So I was wrong.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2022-06-24 13:52  

#29  "Packing" is really watering down, just as "choice" is actually killing.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2022-06-24 13:47  

#28  If they pack the court, next we just bump it up to 287. Play their game to the max.
Posted by: Silentbrick   2022-06-24 13:46  

#27  Besoeker, I think what MM meant is that, yes, there is no "set" number for the amount of judges on SCOTUS, but that it would take something to etch a particular number in Constitutional stone. The current nine is just a arbitrary as seven or thirteen.
Posted by: DooDahMan   2022-06-24 13:20  

#26  Ask Michael Flynn (and ask Sussman).
Posted by: DooDahMan   2022-06-24 13:18  

#25  M Murcek, no, I don’t believe it does require a Constitutional amendment , Congress is given the authority to establish the structure of the Court, and I think has previously expanded the number of justices, though not in a very long time.
Posted by: Glenmore    2022-06-24 13:17  

#24  Trump filled as many court vacancies as possible with conservative judges during his 4 years as POTUS. Now the judicial community has a very conservative mindset that lives even after the big WH steal.
Posted by: Black Charlie Slairt1430   2022-06-24 13:11  

#23  As a strict constructionist, the charge must happen in the jurisdiction it occurred, but that's just me.

Amendment VI

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law,...
Posted by: Procopius2k   2022-06-24 13:10  

#22  Begs the question. If you and your crazed brother-in-law travel from Georgia to California and you murder him there, will you be charged with murder in Georgia ?
Posted by: Besoeker   2022-06-24 12:52  

#21  
Likely to be over overturned the next time the LSD's stack the SCOTUS.

Remember despite always playing the race card for votes,the LSD's have a long history of demeaning, enslaving and killing Black Americans. An abortion has eliminated over 14 million black births.
Posted by: NN2N1   2022-06-24 12:44  

#20  “Protest” concerns:

Posted by: trailing wife   2022-06-24 12:44  

#19  How long until the Court gets expanded to 13 justices?

That would require a constitutional amendment. Really will not happen.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2022-06-24 12:40  

#18  Not to worry, in Democrat states abortion will still be legal, and they will keep aborting black babies at a tremendous rate.

A trend that Democrats refuse to acknowledge is blacks being out-populated by immigrants. They're becoming less and less important as time passes.
Posted by: Albemarle Snerert7268   2022-06-24 12:23  

#17  18 USC 1507 (I know, I'm naïve.)
Posted by: DooDahMan   2022-06-24 12:11  

#16  Will 'replacement people' still be needed ?

Yes. No worries, people. Abortions will always be available in California, New York, Massachusetts, etc., etc. Call it abortion tourism if you will.

Catholic churches need to start posting armed guards ASAP.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2022-06-24 12:06  

#15  How long until the Court gets expanded to 13 justices? And how long until a civil rights case is filed that blacks have to travel too far from some states to get abortions?
Posted by: Glenmore    2022-06-24 12:01  

#14  Texas Ban on Abortions from ‘Moment of Conception’ Set to Start in 30 Days
Posted by: Skidmark   2022-06-24 11:46  

#13  Roberts is a grandstander. If he can't be the all powerful swing vote that stabs conservatives in the back, he hides behind Thomas while flaunting his pretend conservative credentials.
Posted by: Rex Mundi   2022-06-24 11:38  

#12  Yeah, when's Roberts going to come back down to Earth and side with the socialist judges?
Posted by: DooDahMan   2022-06-24 11:16  

#11  Interesting it was 6 to 3. I figured it would be 5 to 4.

Agreed. Roberts is a strange duck. Fine with Obamacare and stolen elections, then votes to overturn Roe. WTF?
Posted by: Angstrom   2022-06-24 11:09  

#10  Interesting it was 6 to 3. I figured it would be 5 to 4.
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2022-06-24 11:03  

#9  Good thing I ordered another 300 rounds. In case any rioting spills out of Downtown Houston. Really unlikely they'd make it far. Cops were very concerned about rioters vs citizens there:p (Would end poorly for rioters)
Posted by: Silentbrick   2022-06-24 10:57  

#8  Watching the protest on Fox right now. From the screamers I see on teevee, I have no problem with them NOT reproducing.
Posted by: Besoeker   2022-06-24 10:51  

#7  Protests erupt outside Supreme Court in Washington DC as US braces for weekend of violence after justices struck down Roe v. Wade which guarantees women right to an abortion
Posted by: Skidmark   2022-06-24 10:47  

#6  Will 'replacement people' still be needed ?
Posted by: Besoeker   2022-06-24 10:45  

#5  Now let the abortion insurrection begin.
Posted by: Glalet Slaiger2825   2022-06-24 10:43  

#4  Back to States' rules, as it should have been. Emanations and penumbras = bullshit
Posted by: Frank G   2022-06-24 10:39  

#3  Snowflake tears are flooding Washington DC streets.
Posted by: Chris   2022-06-24 10:38  

#2  ...Gonna be a loooong weekend.

Mike
Posted by: MikeKozlowski   2022-06-24 10:38  

#1  Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade in landmark opinion
Posted by: Skidmark   2022-06-24 10:27  

00:00