You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
4 Times FDA Was Dead Wrong About an ‘Approved’ Drug
2022-06-21
[CHD] As history shows, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention don’t always get it right the first time they declare a drug "safe" — in fact, sometimes they’re dead wrong.

Throughout the pandemic, health officials have urged the public to "trust the science," reassuring people that "the science" is the basis for any recommendations originating from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Dr. Anthony Fauci, chief medical advisor to President Biden on COVID-19, at one point even went as far as to tell the media if they criticize him, "They’re really criticizing science because I represent science. That’s dangerous."

In the U.S., the FDA approves new drugs, including vaccines — or, as is the case with COVID-19 vaccines, grants them Emergency Use Authorization. The CDC then recommends them.

Once that process is completed, it’s assumed the public — and the mainstream media — will unquestionably trust that the drugs or other treatments are safe and effective.

But as we’ve seen recently — when Newsweek last week broke with mainstream media and published two opinion pieces criticizing the U.S. government’s response to COVID-19 and claiming Americans don’t trust the CDC — not everyone buys everything the FDA and CDC are selling.

As history shows, the FDA and CDC don’t always get it right — in fact, sometimes they’re dead wrong.

Whether they err because they allow pharmaceutical companies to deceive them, or because the agencies are populated with "experts" whose financial conflicts of interest cloud their judgment, the results are the same.

There is a lack of a firewall between the FDA and drugmakers who pay much of the agency’s fees.

For example, the current FDA commissioner, Dr. Robert Califf, who had previously served in that role and was again nominated by President Biden, has 50 conflicts of interest.

After leaving the FDA in 2017, Califf became head of medical strategy at Google’s parent company, Alphabet Inc. He also presided over a discredited drug trial of the blood thinner Xarelto, which was linked to at least 370 deaths, according to the Chicago Tribune.

Discussing the Vioxx scandal on PBS, Califf said, "Many of us consult with the pharmaceutical industry, which I think is a very good thing. They need ideas and then the decision about what they do is really up to the person who is funding the study."

As the FDA and CDC unleash risky, experimental COVID-19 vaccines on babies and toddlers, it’s worth looking back at some of their deadliest mistakes....
Posted by:DooDahMan

#11  “Conspiracy Theory” Confirmed: Covid Jabs INCREASE Risk of Infection According to New England Journal of Medicine
Posted by: Angstrom   2022-06-21 12:03  

#10  Children as young as THREE are among the first under fives in America to get COVID jab after CDC authorized vaccine roll out to babies of just six months
Posted by: Skidmark   2022-06-21 10:48  

#9  Was flipping through channels. TCM, the classic movie channel, was doing some fluff piece about how vaccine scientists saved our ass during Obama or something.

Quick question, is the Covid shot approved yet?
Posted by: swksvolFF   2022-06-21 10:46  

#8  FDA tried to ban NAC 2 years ago. Still can't get it on Amazon. It's been on the market since the 60's and there is literally not a single fatality associated with it. Aspirin is more dangerous. They want us sick, because it's good for business.
Posted by: Angstrom   2022-06-21 09:22  

#7  @#4 - Oh, there's no doubt about it. With Americans gulping down thorazines (credit The Ramones) and countless/numerous drugs, I thought I read a long time ago that crap is ending up in lakes and streams--and ending up in seafood.

And "they" worry about carbon emissions. Another end-around.
Posted by: DooDahMan   2022-06-21 08:25  

#6  nn2n1, its called thalidomide.
Posted by: 49 Pan   2022-06-21 08:03  

#5  Does anyone doubt there's mRNA in the water now too?
Posted by: M. Murcek   2022-06-21 07:53  

#4  /\ 'Troubled Water' by Seth M. Siegel

Not from the book:

In 2008, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) tested tap water in
nine states across the country and found 85 man-made chemicals,
including some medications.
• Other research has reported traces of various pharmaceuticals in
drinking water supplies including: drinking water supplies, including:
• Antibiotics
• Anticonvulsants
• Mood stabilizers
• Synthetic hormones (oral contraceptives)

Source: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2016-12/documents/lenehan-hormones_in_water_using_spe_and_lc-ms.pdf
Posted by: Besoeker   2022-06-21 07:39  

#3  I'm starting to think estrogen in the water supply should be treated like second-hand smoke as a real health hazard.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2022-06-21 07:32  

#2  
All deadly, yes, like the Vioxx commonly proscribed back in 1999-2003.

But let us not forget that many drugs still sold as safe that cause 10's of 1,000's of Birth Defects each year.

Example: For us born in the 2nd dark age (pre-Internet ☺). Some might remember the poplar sleeping pill issued to mothers to be that caused the 2 finger arm birth defects we saw a lot of growing up.

Right Now!
There are many research groups looking into drug and environmental links regarding the explosion of Autism in the USA and some parts of the EU.
Posted by: NN2N1   2022-06-21 07:28  

#1  Then end result is lack of faith. Year by year visible degradation is seen and heard. Avoidance will be the end result. Some people are as cattle but many others will avoid all services.
Posted by: Dale   2022-06-21 03:53  

00:00