You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
Retired FSB Col.Igor Girkin: Operational situation at the front.
2022-06-19
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.

Operational situation at the front.

It is characterized by the final completion of the Second ("concrete") stage of the so-called. NWO. The offensive of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation and the Armed Forces of the LDNR (who are completely subordinate to the command of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, if someone has not yet understood this) in the Donbass has completely fizzled out.

Apparently, our troops have reached the limit of their offensive capabilities and now the maximum that can be expected is that they will be able to "torment" the industrial zone of Severodonetsk and the remnants of the bridgehead of the Armed Forces of Ukraine on the Seversky Donets in this area.

There was an operational pause in the remaining areas in active hostilities.

During the battle, which lasted almost two months, both sides suffered huge (in relation to the total number of manpower and equipment involved) losses. In terms of manpower, the Ukrainians lost noticeably more, but they are able to quickly make up for the losses, and even being "on a string" from defeat, they did not use their main strategic reserves here, firmly adhering to the defensive tactics chosen in this operation.

In general, if we evaluate the past operation from a military-theoretical point of view, then it is incorrect to talk about "victory" on both sides:

- Russian troops failed to achieve the set strategic goals, or even to get much closer to them (the complete liberation of Donbass is almost as far away as in early May). At the same time, they managed to liberate a number of important territories and large settlements (Popasnaya, Krasny Liman, Severodonetsk), push the Armed Forces of Ukraine behind the Seversky Donets and defeat a number of units and formations of the Armed Forces of Ukraine almost "to the ground".

- the Ukrainian command, in general, managed to solve its main task - to stay in the area of ​​Donetsk and Gorlovka, prevent the defeat of the main forces of its Donetsk group and gain time to create new reserves. At the same time, this result was worth heavy losses and a drop in the morale of part of the troops.

In general, therefore, the result of the May-June battle in the Donbass can be called a "draw". However, in general, the scales (in my subjective opinion) leaned slightly towards Kyiv. Why? - The answer is elementary: the very gain of time.

The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation failed to defeat the Armed Forces of Ukraine, even partially "on the last homemade pies." "Pies" are almost completely "eaten up" and need to be re-formed and large replenishments to restore combat capability.

This, of course, does not mean that the Russian General Staff no longer has reserves at its disposal. There are reserves - they have been prepared "urgently" since April or early May. New units and formations are being knocked together - moreover, their replenishment (according to the idiotic-ostentatious desire "a la Hitler in 1944" - to have "as many units and formations on paper as possible") is carried out due to the lack of replenishment for those already at war and carrying large loss of shelled military units. The result is that "completely raw" units will again fall to the front, mixed with those withdrawn and replenished after the "first-stage run to the border."

However, the picture of the Ukrainians is approximately the same: many new units from recruits + some ahead of time replenished personnel who have avoided the "Donetsk meat grinder".

How long the operational pause will last and when the summer battle for the initiative will begin (from a great mind, everything was "announced" by the same R. Kadyrov as a "rapid and effective stage") - I do not know.

Terms can be from a week to a month and a half. Hardly any longer. It is unlikely that our military will be able to delay until autumn with the start of a new offensive operation, enduring continuously growing attacks on Donetsk and the territory of the Russian Federation itself. Or rather, it is unlikely that the political leadership will tolerate such restraint. Similarly, the Armed Forces of Ukraine - after heavy losses at the front, their military-political leadership urgently needs a major (or at least looking like such) military success.

I still assume that the battle may have a "counter-multidirectional character." That is, Russian troops can attack in one region, and the Armed Forces of Ukraine - in another. Moreover, both sides will try to "catch" the enemy on a successful defense in combination with counterattacks. The Donetsk front is likely to become "quiet" for some time (which does not at all mean an end to terrorist shelling by the Armed Forces of Ukraine and fighting of local significance). I cautiously assume the main battles in the area of ​​​​Kherson and Kharkov. At least, it is in the Kherson direction behind the front that a fairly large strike force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine is concentrated.

To what extent my predictions will come true - time will tell. It is difficult for me to claim high accuracy in the field of "event / time of event" without having ANY information from headquarters military sources and drawing conclusions based on a very rare "mosaic" and my own thoughts.

Posted by:badanov

#6  ^ Very well said. Biden is a pathological, congenital liar whose lies advance no strategic concept at all.
Posted by: Billy Budd   2022-06-19 13:46  

#5  In Joe Bidet's case, it's much less elaborate. He's the sort of incontinent and indiscriminate liar who will lie even when the truth would actually be more to his advantage.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2022-06-19 13:29  

#4  They're lying to us. They're not lying when they talk to Zelensky or Putin. A great political scientist who studied elites' lying found that leaders of democracies are far more likely to lie to their own people than to other leaders. This is because their own people trust them, whereas leaders do not trust each other. Thus they can get away with lying. He cites Franklin Roosevelt, Lyndon Johnson and Donald Rumsfeld as examples.

Here is a review of "Why Leaders Lie: The Truth About Lying in International Politics"

Summary
In Why Leaders Lie, Mearsheimer provides the first systematic analysis of lying as a tool of statecraft, identifying the varieties, the reasons, and the potential costs and benefits. Drawing on a trove of examples, he argues that leaders often lie for good strategic reasons, so a blanket condemnation is unrealistic and unwise.

Yet there are other kinds of deception besides lying, including concealment and spinning. Perhaps no distinction is more important than that between lying to another state and lying to one’s own people. Mearsheimer was amazed to discover how unusual interstate lying has been; given the atmosphere of distrust among the great powers, he found that outright deceit is difficult to pull off and thus rarely worth the effort.

Leaders more often mislead their own publics, sometimes with damaging consequences. Though the reasons may be noble–Franklin Roosevelt, for example, lied to the American people about German U-boats attacking the destroyer Greer in 1940, to build a case for war against Hitler--they can easily lead to disaster...
Posted by: Akira   2022-06-19 13:17  

#3  The new chief of Britain's Army just told us to get ready for World War III.

Stoltenberg says the war will go on for years.

Perhaps they're just posturing while Macron Scholz and Draghi are secretly passing along the capitulation terms to Zelensky... Stoltenberg a week ago said publicly that there has to be a peace settlement with territorial concessions. So maybe this is just more bullshit from a crew that's spread nothing but lies and nonsense for months.

But it's more likely that demented old Biden actually believes this shit and welcomes a world war. Biden and Raytheon-Austin are escalating the war and destroying the world's economy. These people are fucking insane and need to be overthrown.

Prepare to fight and beat Russia in a Third World War, Britain's top general warns: New UK Army commander tells troops to brace for European land war
Posted by: Billy Budd   2022-06-19 12:58  

#2  Link to 9 April 2022 Jacques Baud article; 'A NATO expert, denounces western coverage of the Ukraine invasion' from SHEERPOST found here.
Posted by: Besoeker   2022-06-19 12:22  

#1  I just wanted to add this from my contact in Vietnam. He was involved in security during the war with Vietnam.
Posted by: Dale   2022-06-19 10:26  

00:00