Submit your comments on this article |
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
Russia looks to scrap upper age limit for soldiers |
2022-05-26 |
Is this meaningful, given the numbers of Russian troops killed (by both sides) and captured during this little war? The breakaway republics and the Ukrainian militants both have men fighting for them 60+ years old, all volunteers. [IsraelTimes] Russia’s parliament is to consider scrapping the upper age limit for signing up to join the army, in a sign Moscow may be looking to recruit more troops for its military campaign in Ukraine. Under current legislation, only Russians aged 18 to 40 and foreign nationals aged 18 to 30 have the right to sign their first military service contract. A draft bill on the agenda of the lower house State Duma would completely lift that upper age limit. "Highly professional specialists are needed to use high-precision weapons and operate weapons and military equipment," says a note accompanying the draft bill. The note said that such specialists usually acquire the necessary skills when they reach their early- to mid-40s. President Vladimir Putin ![]() sent troops to Ukraine on February 24 but three months into Moscow’s military campaign the offensive has "lost momentum," Western defense chiefs say. |
Posted by:trailing wife |
#9 I remember fondly the Navy Chiefs and Gunner's Mated recalled for the Iowa Class Battleships coming out of mothballs. One of then actually had a walker, but nobody knew how to make some of the systems work. When I visited the Iowa in Long Beach a few years ago, the retired Navy guy gave me a blank stare when I asked about the ballistic range-finders for local control on the 16-inch turrets. Co-incident range finding was unknown to the guy. |
Posted by: NoMoreBS 2022-05-26 11:41 |
#8 Getting more people killed is not a solution to a population crunch. |
Posted by: Rob Crawford 2022-05-26 11:33 |
#7 That sparked a memory from the late 70s early 80s. The Army recruited retired physicians. One that showed up on our installation had served in WW2, as a youngin, and was entitled to wear ribbons no one had seen in their service. |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2022-05-26 10:24 |
#6 I think we just found a couple teams Kaperneck can make. |
Posted by: swksvolFF 2022-05-26 10:20 |
#5 Nothing annoys me quite as much as seeing a sheriff in a uniform with 5 stars on the collar tabs. Fucking pretentious. |
Posted by: M. Murcek 2022-05-26 10:15 |
#4 The US has an age limit for enlistments but its based upon the probability of reaching a 20 year retirement. So enlisting at 40 would imply age 60 to reach retirement which is the point. However, that has been waived in the past for those who sign a paper saying they do not expect to remain in long enough for that to happen. Also note that in the 'contract', you may or may not have read, for Regular Army that you may be recalled at anytime by the Secretary of the Service. IIRC, that was adjusted till age 65 by some legislation in the 90s. Small factoid, five star generals are never retired, but are kept on the rolls. Bradley being the last. |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2022-05-26 10:09 |
#3 Well, how old is |
Posted by: M. Murcek 2022-05-26 10:05 |
#2 "Highly professional specialists are needed to use high-precision weapons and operate weapons and military equipment" and all the old shit that's left. |
Posted by: Skidmark 2022-05-26 10:02 |
#1 ...There was a confirmed report a couple days ago of a retired Russian Air Force general in his 60s who came back to fly combat. Unfortunately, the Ukranians retired him again, this time with extreme prejudice. The point here though is that they're putting guys my age in combat. Mike |
Posted by: MikeKozlowski 2022-05-26 08:16 |