You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
Russia debuts an ancient weapon - Kh-22
2022-05-12
[Tom Cooper]
Point is: yesterday, a video surfaced purportedly shown the release of two Kh-22 (‘AS-4 Kitchen’) missiles from a Tu-22M-3 bomber.

Must admit, had to re-view that video two times just to trust my eyes.

The Kh-22 was originally developed — back in the 1960s — to strike heavily-protected targets on land, like air bases or major air defence installations, or heavily protected naval targets — like aircraft carriers. Developed back in the 1960s, it’s an old weapon: something like ‘1,5 generation’ of Soviet guided missiles. Unsurprisingly, in ‘land attack mode’ it had ‘circular error probable’ of about 3 miles: therefore, back in the 1960s it was usually equipped with a nuclear warhead. Certainly enough, conventional warheads were developed, as was an anti-radar variant, too and during the 1970s — and in conjunction with then brand-new Tu-22M bomber — it was considered the biggest threat for US Navy’s aircraft carriers.

Over the last few years, there were reports about an upgrade to the Kh-32 standard; but, considering the poor state of the Russian high-tech military sector since Moscow lost the contact to over 50 Ukrainian military research and development facilities, in 2014, and how, literally, ‘toxic’ this weapon is (because of its propellant), I have my doubts about that part of the story.

Anyway: apparently, after all these years, the Kh-22 now saw its combat premiere, too. Guess,might explain lots of Ukrainian reports about ‘mysterious detonations’ well away from anything meaningful, which appeared in the last few days.
Posted by:3dc

#11  He's so insistent!
Posted by: Skidmark   2022-05-12 16:51  

#10  Steve, cross-bows are next week.

OP, always good to read your insight.
Posted by: Matt   2022-05-12 16:15  

#9  RE #6: They were homing missiles, but it was easy to spoof them and break the lock. Not very effective, but with a large warhead.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2022-05-12 15:52  

#8  RE #6: They were homing missiles, but it was easy to spoof them and break the lock. Not very effective, but with a large warhead.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2022-05-12 15:52  

#7  RE #6: They were homing missiles, but it was easy to spoof them and break the lock. Not very effective, but with a large warhead.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2022-05-12 15:52  

#6  How do you take out radars with something that inaccurate?
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2022-05-12 15:14  

#5  "Make the rubble bounce!"
They didn't say where.
Posted by: ed in texas   2022-05-12 13:58  

#4  They were on clearance
Posted by: Super Hose   2022-05-12 12:25  

#3  “I do not know with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.” – Albert Einstein.
Posted by: Papa Cooky   2022-05-12 12:16  

#2  A Soviet era long-range anti ship missile. Probably have big piles of them laying around.
When they said 'ancient weapon', I was expecting cross-bows or an atlatl.
Posted by: SteveS   2022-05-12 10:52  

#1  *Shrug* Use 'em or lose 'em to dry rot in storage
Posted by: magpie   2022-05-12 10:33  

00:00