| Submit your comments on this article |
| Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
| Russia threatens to send nuclear weapons to the Baltic Sea if Finland and Sweden join NATO to 'restore the balance' after Putin's Ukraine invasion spectacularly backfired |
| 2022-04-15 |
| Posted by:Skidmark |
| #11 I want to see more Russian warships sink. |
| Posted by: Neville Unusong6965 2022-04-15 19:24 |
| #10 Throw in a "stomachs roasting in a sea of fire" or "Russo Songun" and you've got me |
| Posted by: Frank G 2022-04-15 19:09 |
| #9 This fiery rhetoric is kind of Class A ball stuff when compared to NK regular fare. I am disappointed n the lack of metaphors and spittle. Maye a 3 at best. |
| Posted by: Super Hose 2022-04-15 17:17 |
| #8 I thought they already had nukes in Kaliningrad - so whats the difference? |
| Posted by: Yosemite Sam 2022-04-15 13:43 |
| #7 ^^^^^Ref the above, is this connected to the Turks suddenly re-stating a limit on Russian Naval access? It looks like the depth might be 1000 to 1500 meters from a quick map recon, but the middle quickly drops off to 2500 meters. Someone in Istanbul might be very interested in poking around the wreck. |
| Posted by: NoMoreBS 2022-04-15 11:43 |
| #6 After the Moskva sank, there are rumors that a couple of Russian nukes are now sleeping with the fishes in the Black Sea. |
| Posted by: Bubba Lover of the Faeries8843 2022-04-15 10:14 |
| #5 How many times has Russia invaded surrounding nations and had it ASS handed to it while trying, or later lost control? More than once. |
| Posted by: NN2N1 2022-04-15 08:53 |
| #4 There already are nukes in Kaliningrad. But I think he is referring to mobile launched nukes being moved up there. |
| Posted by: DarthVader 2022-04-15 08:04 |
| #3 The difference in this situation is crossing the red line with Putin means something. |
| Posted by: Dale 2022-04-15 07:53 |
| #2 So Grande armada, you don’t dispute the story, just the messenger? |
| Posted by: Xyz 2022-04-15 01:39 |
| #1 |
| Posted by: Grande armada 2022-04-15 01:28 |