Comments

You have commented 358 times on Rantburg.

Your Name

Your e-mail (optional)

Website (optional)

	My Original Nic Pic-a-Nic Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Foto

Submit your comments on this article

-Great Cultural Revolution

NYT Reporter: Jan 6 Media ‘Overreaction,’ FBI Involved; Traumatized Colleagues are ''Fu*king Bit*hes''

2022-03-09

[YouTube - ProjectVeritas]

Pulitzer Prize Winning New York Times

... which still proudly displays Walter Duranty's Pulitzer prize...
Reporter: January 6 Media Coverage ’Overreaction,’ FBI
FBI

...Formerly one of the world's premier criminal investigation organizations, something for a nation to be proud of. Now it's a political arm of the Deep State oligarchy that is willing to trump up charges, suppress evidence, or take out insurance policies come election time...
Involved, Event Was Not Organized Despite Ongoing Narrative

• NYT National Security Correspondent, Matthew Rosenberg, contradicts his own January 6 reporting: "There were a ton of FBI informants among the people who attacked the Capitol."

• Rosenberg: "It was like, me and two other colleagues who were there [January 6] outside and we were just having fun!"

• Rosenberg: "I know I’m supposed to be traumatized, but like, all these colleagues who were in the [Capitol] building and are like ’Oh my God it was so scary!’ I’m like, ’f*ck off!’"

• Rosenberg: "I’m like come on, it’s not the kind place I can tell someone to man up but I kind of want to be like, ’dude come on, you were not in any danger.’"

• Rosenberg: "These f*cking little dweebs who keep going on about their trauma. Shut the f*ck up. They’re f*cking b*tches."

• Rosenberg: "They [media] were making too big a deal. They were making this an organized thing that it wasn’t."

• Rosenberg RESPONDS: "Will I stand by those comments? Absolutely."

Project Veritas published a bombshell video on Tuesday showing Pulitzer Prize winning New York Times correspondent, Matthew Rosenberg, speaking about the events of January 6, 2021, in a way that contradicts his own reporting.

Rosenberg, who covers national security matters for the Times, says on the undercover video that "there were a ton of FBI informants among the people who attacked the Capitol."

This revelation is a break from Rosenberg’s reporting on the matter where he characterized such a notion of FBI informants in the crowd as a "reimagining of Jan. 6."

This was not the only time Rosenberg’s commentary to Project Veritas’ undercover news hound directly contradicted his own published words. Despite telling a Veritas journalist that January 6 was "no big deal," his article says that downplaying the events of that day was "the next big lie."

Soundbites of Rosenberg published Tuesday show him saying, "They [media] were making too big a deal. They were making this an organized thing that it wasn’t."

Project Veritas founder and CEO James O’Keefe revealed that Rosenberg’s article titled, "The Next Big Lies: Jan 6 was No Big Deal, or A Left-Wing Plot," was written around the same time as he was making contradictory statements to a Project Veritas undercover news hound.

In the video, Rosenberg also revealed that January 6 was "fun," a contradiction to his reporting that January 6 was "a ~~violent~~ mostly peaceful interruption to the transition of power in American history."

Rosenberg said, "It was like, me and two other colleagues who were there outside and we were just having fun."

He even appears to make fun of his New York Times colleagues in one soundbite saying, "I know I’m supposed to be traumatized, but like, all these colleagues who were in the [Capitol] building, and are like, ’Oh my God it was so scary!’ I’m like, ’f*ck off!’" He adds, "I’m like come on, it’s not the kind place I can tell someone to man up but I kind of want to be like, ’dude come on, you were not in any danger.’"

Rosenberg concludes, "These f*cking little dweebs who keep going on about their trauma. Shut the f*ck up. They’re f*cking b*tches."

Posted by:trailing wife

#8 J6 was a staged false flag operation by the Deep State. What came after is all cover-up by the DS. We've had our very own Reichstaged Fire; an internal coup to get rid of Trump. For four plus years,the DS expended its energy trying to destroy Trump. Hopefully, 2022 will give control of Congress to Maga and 2024 to Trump in order to clean out the current corrupticrats.

Posted by: JohnQC 2022-03-09 19:16

#7 ..maybe contrition?

Posted by: Procopius2k 2022-03-09 09:47

#6 Why are you even bothering with this? The NYT wants you to look at Ukraine, Ukraine, Ukraine. Pay no attention to those election thieves! Fight for democracy in Ukraine!

Posted by: No Fortunate Son 2022-03-09 09:39

#5 Oh, and the original tweet he links has been suspended, so only the attached discussion can be seen. Sadly, that’s the kind of Democrat/Progressive narrative-protecting behaviour we know to expect from Twitter.

Posted by: trailing wife 2022-03-09 09:38

#4 That was bad. This is worse:

BREAKING: NYT reporter says there were ‘a ton of FBI informants’ among the people who attacked the Capitol https://t.co/Ta9Lg8iMqx
— Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) March 9, 2022

Posted by: trailing wife 2022-03-09 09:34

#3 The guy said all this while printing columns saying the opposite to keep the Jan 6 myth going.

Posted by: ruprecht 2022-03-09 08:22

#2
There is the "allowed" to be printed word,
and then there is the TRUTH.

Posted by: NN2N1 2022-03-09 05:51

#1 I'm like, f*cking shocked that, like, f*cking Pulitzer Prize winning journalists are like, such like f*cking little incoherent like bitches
like

Posted by: Snusosing Angens1142 2022-03-09 05:20

00:00