| Submit your comments on this article |
| -Great Cultural Revolution |
| Biden stands by pledge to nominate a Black woman to Supreme Court |
| 2022-01-27 |
| [Al-Rooters via JPost] That "black woman VP" has done so well.... President Joe Biden stands by his pledge to nominate a Black woman to the US Supreme Court, White House press secretary Jen Psaki said on Wednesday. Psaki did not confirm liberal Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer's retirement, telling reporters any announcement would be up to Breyer. |
| Posted by:Frank G |
| #22 #22-30 killed for a tech stutter, not a reflection on JHH |
| Posted by: Frank G 2022-01-27 20:13 |
| #21 Think Politically Deeper. Any (R) or (I) or (S) not voting to approve any female black judge no matter how far left. Will be plastered all over the MEDIA and labeled a RACIST. All nice and neatly done just before Mid-Term elections. That's worth at least $5M to 10M in free advertising. |
| Posted by: NN2N1 2022-01-27 17:47 |
| #20 We already have a 'wise Latinx" who (rhetorically) put 100,000 kids in the hospital with covid. Do we need any more of that caliber? |
| Posted by: Bobby 2022-01-27 17:07 |
| #19 Rachel Dolezal, or why you need me in the US Senate to name nominees. Duchess of Suxxit is a fine choice, too. |
| Posted by: swksvolFF 2022-01-27 13:40 |
| #18 Exactly what I was thinking jpal, I say someone whisper Candace Owens in his ear and get him confused. |
| Posted by: Chris 2022-01-27 12:23 |
| #17 Stacey Abrams has a sister Leslie Abrams Gardner who is a U.S. District Judge of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia. Local news here is touting her as a possibility. |
| Posted by: jpal 2022-01-27 10:47 |
| #16 ^ Yes. Give as good as we have gotten. For sure. |
| Posted by: M. Murcek 2022-01-27 10:46 |
| #15 Biden's Supreme Court Pick Sexually Assaulted Me 25 Years Ago |
| Posted by: Anomalous Sources 2022-01-27 10:43 |
| #14 Do you mean Megie Moo or the Douchess of Suxexx? |
| Posted by: M. Murcek 2022-01-27 10:38 |
| #13 Meghan. |
| Posted by: Merrick Ferret 2022-01-27 10:36 |
| #12 Oprah. |
| Posted by: SteveS 2022-01-27 10:27 |
| #11 Lets see: must be black: he is racist must be woman: he is anti-male |
| Posted by: irish rage boy 2022-01-27 10:21 |
| #10 Bwahahahahahahahhahhaaaaa. All that beating on Manchin and Sinema is already paying off - https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/01/27/joe-manchin-says-no-rubber-stamp-for-bidens-supreme-court-nominee/ |
| Posted by: M. Murcek 2022-01-27 10:08 |
| #9 So much for the content or her character, let just vote for the color of her skin... |
| Posted by: 49 Pan 2022-01-27 10:02 |
| #8 Whoever the dems confirm will be a lock step liberal, which means no actual change. The issue to watch is which party is in power when Thomas retires or passes. |
| Posted by: M. Murcek 2022-01-27 09:51 |
| #7 They all "evolve" quickly once confirmed. Look at Roberts, Kavanaugh and Barrett. All have moved left since appointed. |
| Posted by: M. Murcek 2022-01-27 09:49 |
| #6 “reflects the fact that we operate in a system of precedent.” Plessy? Slaughterhouse? |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2022-01-27 09:46 |
| #5 Actually, I'm expecting the second coming of Merrick Garland since she just changed her name to Merica Garland and identifies as a black woman: |
| Posted by: Mercutio 2022-01-27 09:29 |
| #4 Now they're saying it's going to be either Judge Leondra Kruger (CA Supreme Court) or Judge Ketanji Jackson (D.C. Court of Apeals). Each is a former Supreme Court clerk. Kruger is known as a "cautious incrementalist" with a respect for precedent. Lefty publication Vox says: In a 2018 interview with the Los Angeles Times, Kruger explained that her approach to the law “reflects the fact that we operate in a system of precedent.” She said that she aims “to perform my job in a way that enhances the predictability and stability of the law and public confidence and trust in the work of the courts.” |
| Posted by: Merrick Ferret 2022-01-27 08:53 |
| #3 Is Maxine Waters a lawyer - Just asking....☻ or how about Rep. Teresa Fernandez (D-NM-3) for the 1st Native America on the SCOTUS? BUT!!! Given the SUPREME COURT carries so much authority and control over our rights and daily lives. Shouldn't the pick be the BEST POSSIBLE ---> Constitutionally Focused <--- person, and not limited to some Political Promise made for votes? Such a promise clearly eliminates 100's of more qualified individuals, all more focused on the constitution as written and how to adapt it for "social" issues. |
| Posted by: NN2N1 2022-01-27 06:49 |
| #2 AOC or Whoopy. Perhaps both, two for one deal. |
| Posted by: Dale 2022-01-27 03:58 |
| #1 Some have speculated that Kamala might be on the short list. Can you imagine that? That would open up the VP position for someone else - perhaps Hillary.... I'm sure if she got that poor Biden would become depressed, even suicidal. |
| Posted by: CrazyFool 2022-01-27 00:58 |