You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
CDC refutes Justice Sotomayor's assertion that 100,000 US children hospitalized from COVID-19
2022-01-10
[THEPOSTMILLENNIAL] The CDC is setting the record straight after Supreme Court
...the political football known as The Highest Court in the Land, home of penumbrae and emanations...
Justice Sonia Sotomayor claimed that the Omicron variant has placed 100,000 US children in the hospital, with CDC Director Rochelle Walensky stating that just a mere fraction of that number of kids has been hospitalized.In an interview with "Fox News Sunday," Walensky confirmed to host Bret Baier that fewer than 3,500 children are in the hospital with COVID-19.

While the number of children hospitalized with COVID-19 remains low, the CDC chief stressed the importance of getting vaccinated against the virus, stating that those children that were hospitalized generally were not vaccinated.

"Yeah, but, you know, here's what I can tell you about our pediatric hospitalizations now," Walkensky said. "First of all, the vast majority of children who are in the hospital are unvaccinated, and for those children who are not eligible for vaccination we do know they are most likely to get sick with COVID if their family members aren't vaccinated."

As the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case involving the Biden administration, the same old faces in slightly different places, the same old ideas, the same old graft
...the gang of subgeniuses trying to pass themselves off as the adults in charge of the series of calamities characteristic of the administration of a mentally challenged geriatric case...
's vaccine mandate on Friday, Sotomayor claimed that "We have over 100,000 children, which we've never had before, at death's door and many on ventilators." The justice was later lambasted for using the alarmist language Friday and overstating the number of child hospitalizations.

Walensky also noted that the number of those in the hospital that have COVID-19 generally include patients who go to hospitals for other reasons and happen to test positive while they are there, as opposed to those who go to the hospital because they are sick with COVID-19.
Posted by:Fred

#6  CrazyFoll- I wondered exactly that too. I reflects she has been compromised intellectually or in some other manner. Never thought affirmative action would hurt this much.
Posted by: Jack Salami   2022-01-10 22:36  

#5  Considering she supposidly had dinner that Evening with the DNC 'leadership' - I think you can guess where her numbers came from.
Clear case of conflict of interest. Do you think she'll recluse herself?

Never.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2022-01-10 22:13  

#4  ^ Is that a Photoshop?

Putting on my geek hat, reviewing courts including the Supremes are supposed to work with the record developed by the trial court. The Supremes aren't supposed to investigate the facts, conduct discovery, or get "facts" from the NYT. And Sotomayor's numbers show why that rule is a really good one.
Posted by: Matt   2022-01-10 11:47  

#3  Oral Arguments Postponed As Justice Sotomayor Gets Gavel Stuck Up Her Nose Again
Posted by: Frank G   2022-01-10 11:39  

#2  Well. They are both wrong, just in different ways for different reasons.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2022-01-10 10:24  

#1  Liberals aren't bothered by facts, so don't expect any statement corrections from her.
Posted by: Mullah Richard   2022-01-10 10:21  

00:00