You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Elizabeth Warren blasts 'Republican hijacking' of the Supreme Court and supports adding at least 4 more justices to the bench
2021-12-16
[MSN] Sen. Elizabeth Being Native American has been part of my story since the day I was born Warren
The Great White Squaw, Lizzie is the Dem Senatrix from Massachussetts. She traces her noble lineage all the way back to Big Chief Spouting Bull. She has high cheekbones that stretch all the way to the top of her head. It has been alleged that she speaks with forked tongue but she denies that. She had a DNA test to prove her lineage and it turns out she's colorless
on Wednesday fiercely condemned the Supreme Court
...the political football known as The Highest Court in the Land, home of penumbrae and emanations...
's current 6-3 conservative majority and came out in support for expanding the number of justices on the bench."I believe it's time for Congress to yet again use its constitutional authority to expand the number of justices on the Supreme Court," the Massachusetts Democrat she wrote in a Boston Globe op-ed. "I don't come to this conclusion lightly or because I disagree with a particular decision; I come to this conclusion because I believe the current court threatens the democratic foundations of our nation."

Warren said that adding more justices would help "rebalance" the court, which she claims in recent years has undermined its legitimacy and independence because of a slew of "radical right-wing" decisions, particularly concerning voting rights, labor unions, and corporate power.

"This radical court has reversed century-old campaign-finance restrictions, opening the floodgates for corporations to spend unlimited sums of money to buy our elections. It has reversed well-settled law that once required employers to permit union organizers to meet with workers," Warren wrote. "And it has gutted one of the most important civil rights laws of our time, the Voting Rights Act, not once but twice."



Posted by:Fred

#14  Not a fan of Musk but Warren is yet another kakocratic exemplar of the absurdity of our mendacious, moronic, grifting political class.

Remember, this blue-eyed blonde buffoon scammed her way into a small fortune by posing as Harvard Law's first minority woman professor.

If the conniving skank had even 2/3ds of Musk's intellectual horsepower, she'd be a trillionaire
Posted by: Merrick Ferret   2021-12-16 10:56  

#13  I don't think she thinks anything through before opening her mouth.
Posted by: Chris   2021-12-16 10:51  

#12  Musk faces a 15 billion dollar tax bill. Warren paid $5,000 on 12 million dollars.
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2021-12-16 10:51  

#11  Passing the laws required to do this will take time, and the GOP will control both houses and the Executive by the time it comes about. Either she hasn't thought things through or she's just throwing red meat to donors.
Posted by: ruprecht   2021-12-16 10:45  

#10  Musk had a great takedown on this mental midget.

So did Kruiser:
...the paste-eating commie got into with Elon Musk after he was named Time magazine’s “Person of the Year.” Warren accused Musk of “freeloading,” which is too rich coming from a useless politician who’s living off of the taxpayers’ dime.

Elizabeth Warren contributes nothing to American society. Boilerplate gasbag hyperbole isn’t a contribution.

Elon Musk is going to put humans on Mars sometime in the next quarter-century.
Posted by: DarthVader   2021-12-16 08:16  

#9  Ref #8: Yes, a 'work-around' not unlike wat presidential executive orders have become. Warren's fraud does not end with her Native American claims.
Posted by: Besoeker   2021-12-16 07:26  

#8  Which is the evidence that the court has become a end around to Article V amending process. Even though it has been amended 27 times, they know they don't have the means to force through their design of governance that is in fact in conflict with the existing text of the Constitution.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2021-12-16 06:44  

#7  A real deluded nutball. She's advocating the very thing she claims to want to get rid of. I believe she would burn the Constitution if she could.
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2021-12-16 05:47  

#6  Shes OK with democrats highjacking it though.
Posted by: BrerRabbit   2021-12-16 05:43  

#5  

Looking at it from the real world prospective.

People (living US citizens) voted for a President that BELIEVED IN FOLLOWING THE US CONSTITUTION.
A President who then appointed Judges that did the same.

But now look at what Obama, and Clinton appointed. It is clear they wanted judges that ruled and create law to match their political/social needs, instead of following the US Constitution.
Posted by: NN2N1   2021-12-16 05:38  

#4  She reminds me of the neighbor lady who would start yelling at people for no reason.

Elon Musk
Posted by: Woodrow   2021-12-16 03:41  

#3  Remember this maxim: unless it supports whatever the Democrats want today, it is illegitimate. Thus the Democrats are justified in any means of forcing society to their will. Because they're just better people, and thus qualified - nay, obligated - to rule us.

This is our future.
Posted by: Clulet Splat5443   2021-12-16 03:02  

#2  
...threatens the democratic foundations...

Whenever I read something like this from a leftist I know they are working to destroy the Republic. For similar reasons whenever I read the term "elite" I substitute my notion of "garbage elite"
Posted by: Bubba Lover of the Faeries8843   2021-12-16 01:59  

#1  Next week, she will launch a pow-wow on the subject; 4 more needed on Supreme Court, no pale faces need apply... hi a wathta, hi a watha, hi, hi, hi, wo-wo-wo-wo...as she takes to song and dance.
Posted by: Elmeth Snugum3100   2021-12-16 00:15  

00:01