You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Supreme Court won't hear Catholic hospital challenge to transgender surgery
2021-11-02
[WASHINGTONTIMES] The Supreme Court
...the political football known as The Highest Court in the Land, home of penumbrae and emanations...
announced Monday it would not hear a challenge over a Catholic hospital declining to provide transgender surgery, leaving in place the lower court’s ruling in favor of the transgender man.

A transgender man, Evan Minton, sued Dignity Health after the hospital declined to perform his hysterectomy.
That’s dumb. You absolutely don’t want to have a surgery done where they aren’t accustomed to doing them, unless it is a serious emergency, because the odds of dangerous errors are so much higher.
He received the surgery three days later at a non-religious hospital but filed a lawsuit in Caliphornia, an impregnable bastion of the Democratic Party, claiming he was discriminated against.

The lower courts ruled in his favor and against the hospital, which asked the justices to review the case.

Specifically, Dignity Health argued that religious health care institutions should be protected by the First Amendment and not forced to perform surgeries that conflict with its ethics.

The majority of the justices declined to get involved.

Justices Neil M. Gorsuch, Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr. would have taken up the case for review.
Posted by:Fred

#9  Not an emergency.
Not life critical.
Don't have the facilities.

Like wanting an eye exam at the dentist's.

Dave Chapelle is Correct.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2021-11-02 16:18  

#8  The majority of justices are gutless, immoral cowards.
Posted by: Crusader   2021-11-02 15:36  

#7  But your cancer treatments have to be postponed because of COVID.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2021-11-02 12:16  

#6  Isn't this gender appropriation? See - the Left's denunciation of cultural appropriation.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2021-11-02 09:39  

#5  Once again the SC proves it has nothing but cowards on the bench.
Posted by: DarthVader   2021-11-02 08:47  

#4  She is suing because they refused to perform unnecessary surgery. She should be suing the hospital that mutilated her and the psych who reinforced her delusion.
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2021-11-02 07:55  

#3  Why should a physician be required by force of law to perform an elective procedure they find morally repugnant? What's next "female genital mutilation" of minors?
Posted by: magpie   2021-11-02 05:03  

#2  Decadence defined.
Man, hysterectomy... this country has gone insane.
F--k these morons.
Posted by: Merrick Ferret   2021-11-02 01:21  

#1  That’s dumb.
That a man can have a hysterectomy?
Posted by: Glenmore   2021-11-02 01:13  

00:00