You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
District court judge blocks landmark Texas 'fetal heartbeat' abortion law
2021-10-08
[FOXNEWS] A district court judge issued a Temporary Restraining Order blocking Texas S.B. 8 child sacrifice abortion law on Wednesday, finding in favor of the U.S. Department of Justice, which had sought the order to block the law from going into effect.

"A person’s right under the Constitution to choose to obtain an child sacrifice abortion prior to fetal viability is well established. Fully aware that depriving its citizens of this right by direct state action would be flagrantly unconstitutional, the State contrived an unprecedented and transparent statutory scheme to do just that," U.S. District Judge Robert Pittman, of the Western District of Texas, Austin Division, wrote in a 113-page ruling.

The Texas law, signed by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott
... governor of Texas. Abbott is a Republican. His 2014 Dem opponent, state senatrix Wendy Davis, thought the absolute, most pressing, most important issue facing the state was abortion. Abbott beat the pantyhose off her. His 2018 opponent, Lupe Valdez didn't dwell too heavily on abortion, but she lost too...
in May, prohibits child sacrifice abortions once medical professionals can detect cardiac activity, usually around six weeks and before many women know they’re pregnant. Rather than having the state enforce the ban, the law creates a private right of action against individuals who commit or aid and abet an child sacrifice abortion that violates the law — but not against the woman who undergoes the procedure.

Posted by:Fred

#2  Obama appointee. In Berkley on the Brazos. Plus, a 113-page opinion isn't a judicial ruling: it's either a resume builder or an op-ed.
Posted by: Matt   2021-10-08 13:19  

#1  I am still surprised, but guess I shouldn't be, at the arrogance of minor judges who step in when the Supreme Court refused to do so.
Posted by: Tom   2021-10-08 13:10  

00:00