You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
The 'Frey Effect' not such a huge mystery after all
2021-09-10
Another perspective on this story from yesterday.
BLUF:
"This is not Havana syndrome. It's a misnomer," argues Mr Zaid, whose clients were affected in many locations. "What's been going on has been known by the United States government probably, based on evidence that I have seen, since the late 1960s."  

Since 2013, Mr Zaid has represented one employee of the US National Security Agency who believed they were damaged in 1996 in a location which remains classified.  

Mr Zaid questions why the US government has been so unwilling to acknowledge a longer history. One possibility, he says, is because it might open a Pandora's Box of incidents that have been ignored over the years. Another is because the US, too, has developed and perhaps even deployed microwaves itself and wants to keep it secret.  
You mean like...'gain of function'?
The  country's interest in weaponising microwaves extended beyond the end of the Cold War. Reports say from the 1990s, the US Air Force had a project codenamed "Hello" to see if microwaves could create disturbing sounds in people's heads, one called "Goodbye" to test their use for crowd control, and one codenamed "Goodnight" to see if they could be used to kill people. Reports from a decade ago suggested these had not proved successful. 
Posted by:Besoeker

#7  Hey! You gotta "need to know"?
Posted by: Bobby   2021-09-10 12:45  

#6  /\ That theory has been discussed here at nauseam. Incoming signals? Outgoing signals? Incoming as well as outgoing? No one appears to be interested in ascertaining, at least for public consumption.
Posted by: Besoeker   2021-09-10 10:36  

#5  And maybe the affected parties were actually nailed by backscatter from their own poorly shielded devices? Intensity is an inverse square relationship. That's why these microwave rigs in general use are mounted on towers.
Posted by: ed in texas   2021-09-10 10:31  

#4  /\ Is that at all possible Rob ?
Posted by: Besoeker   2021-09-10 06:31  

#3  Zaid is a plaintiff's lawyer -- a group with lower ethics than journalists and politicians.
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2021-09-10 06:17  

#2  Unhappy about their recent rough handling in Kabul, did our former Vauxhaul Cross colleagues and the BBC just give Plugs, Foggy Bottom, and our intelligence community a new credibility challenge ?
Posted by: Besoeker   2021-09-10 05:54  

#1  Because it's a useful casus belli against our "enemies". Moreover if they admitted it was coming from an anti-surveillance weapon, a whole lot of people would be in bureaucratic hot water. Careers are at stake here. This is important.
Posted by: Blinky Pholuling8616   2021-09-10 01:09  

00:00