You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Great Cultural Revolution
Whitlock: Self-Aggrandizement Defines The Culture That Replaced Martin Luther King Jr.'s Dream
2021-08-16
[TheBlaze]
Posted by:Unaitle Uloluling5716

#10  MLK jar's dream is still a worthwhile goal. it is sad the left ditched the dream and went all out pro segregation with a dab of race war.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2021-08-16 17:32  

#9  MLK was a creature of the left, trained by socialists.

Look up Highland School. Historical fact.
Posted by: badanov   2021-08-16 15:57  

#8  While I’ve not studied the history of that period in any depth. certainly the literature of the time strongly suggests that in those days almost all those who fancied themselves intellectuals and/or idealists were communists or socialists of one sort or another. A good many of them included “free love” in their idealized society, and indulged among themselves in the meantime. And certainly the Soviet Union was very involved in all the social movements its people could wriggle their way into the leadership cadres of, in the US, Britain/Europe, and the Third World.

So I would be shocked if Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., of sainted memory, had not been connected to the Left, and that absolutely none in the movement were creatures of the Soviet Union or Maoists — especially those who turned their back on non-violence.
Posted by: trailing wife   2021-08-16 15:07  

#7  #5 Mohandas Gandhi had some nasty little quirks, too.

Nehru too. Perverts and scoundrels.

I was stating what the FBI said about him being a commie of some sort, Platypus. You can see I was miseducated.
Posted by: Dron66046   2021-08-16 12:59  

#6  Martin Luther King Jr. "Him being a marxist and all."

What you talking about?!
Posted by: Unusing Platypus5935   2021-08-16 12:45  

#5  Mohandas Gandhi had some nasty little quirks, too.
Posted by: trailing wife   2021-08-16 12:29  

#4  Thank you for that, Galactic Coordinator and Mullah Richard. I can again see him in the light I was taught at school to.

But his legacy's fcuked, you can't deny that. All thanks to the Patrisses, Ta Nhisis and Georgies.
Posted by: Dron66046   2021-08-16 09:35  

#3  Dron, King may have had indiscretions with young ladies in his personal history, but he was no rapist/voyeur. The FBI floated those scenarios to discredit him, sort of like the orgy and 'golden shower' documents about Trump.
Posted by: Mullah Richard   2021-08-16 08:18  

#2  You may wish to check 'your facts'

Stanford :The Martin Luther King, Jr.
Research and Education Institute
Posted by: Galactic Coordinator Black4861   2021-08-16 02:46  

#1  Martin Luther King Jr. Wasn't he a rapist/voyeur, a pervert of some sort? Do correct me if I'm wrong. Of course the feebs could have made it all up. Him being a marxist and all.

As for the current scenario, many would argue the real dream he had is going perfectly according to plan and this scam begins at him.
Posted by: Dron66046   2021-08-16 02:32  

00:00