You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government Corruption
Ashli Babbit's Shooter Named Again
2021-07-11
[Epoch Times] Now a new name has surfaced in the Babbitt imbroglio‐Lt. Michael L. Byrd‐and while USCP Communications Director Eva Malecki won't confirm he is the shooter, in this case she isn't denying it.

In a little-noticed exchange, Byrd was cited by the acting House sergeant at arms during a brief discussion of the officer who shot Babbitt at a Feb. 25 House hearing.
No leaks to the NYT on that little tidbit?
Both C-SPAN and CNN removed his name from transcripts, but CQ Transcripts‐which, according to its website, provides "the complete word from Capitol Hill; exactly as it was spoken"‐recorded the Capitol official, Timothy Blodgett, referring to the cop as "Officer Byrd." His name is clearly audible in the videotape of the hearing (see video embed further below).

Byrd appears to match the description of the shooter, who video footage shows is an African American dressed that day in a business suit. Jewelry, including a beaded bracelet and lapel pin, also match up with photos of Byrd.

In addition, Byrd's resume lines up with what is known about the experience and position of the officer involved in the shooting‐a veteran USCP officer who holds the rank of lieutenant and is the commander of the House Chamber Section of the Capitol Police.

Following the shooting, Byrd's Internet footprint was scrubbed, including his social media and personal photos.
Coincidence? I think not.
Because Congress has exempted the USCP from Freedom of Information Act requests, the family is suing the D.C. Police "for documents that identify the officer who shot Babbitt … as well as notes and summaries of what the officer said regarding the shooting and the reasons he discharged his weapon." (The D.C. Police has led the investigation into Babbitt's shooting.) A hearing before a judge is scheduled for Sept. 3. Washington-based watchdog Judicial Watch also is suing for the records.
Yet another requirement the Congress has exempted itself from.
Related:
Babbitt: 2021-07-05 Target, Walgreens close early due to thefts in California stores
Babbitt: 2021-07-01 Who Killed Ashli Babbitt - A New Theory Emerges
Babbitt: 2021-06-27 Good Morning
Posted by:Bobby

#2  There are at least three people who are showing weapons about the time of the shooting.

Third photo prior to the shooting.

It would seem that the photo was probably captured from Capital building surveillance video. If it were video wouldn't it be likely that there are other frames after the frame shown in Photo 3. One might assume it might capture the shooter and shooting at the moment of the shooting. It should provide an accurate timeline of the shooting.

If the authorities play it straight, answer the complaint and aren't a part of a cover-up, it ought to be possible to get to the bottom of this shooting:

Information sought in complaint.

But then again, these are not normal times.



Posted by: JohnQC   2021-07-11 10:45  

#1  
"...Congress has exempted the USCP from Freedom of Information Act requests..."

Once again... US Congress has placed itself above the same level of investigation that it demands and imposes on others (eg. Trump).


Posted by: NN2N1   2021-07-11 09:30  

00:00