| Submit your comments on this article |
| Science & Technology |
| Uniquely Designed to Attack Humans': Stunned Researchers Accidentally Discover Covid-19 is a Man-Made Abomination |
| 2021-06-30 |
| [THE LIBERTY DAILY] When a team of researchers in Australia from Flinders University and La Trobe used powerful computers to model the protein receptors in a number of animal species, their goal was to see how the coronavirus' spike protein attached itself to them. What they discovered shocked them. Unlike anything that could have developed over time in nature and jumped to humans, Covid-19 demonstrates a unique design that was intended to attack humans specifically. This is, of course, impossible if one were to believe everything (anything) the Chinese Communist Party has said about the coronavirus. But considering all the evidence is pointing to the theory that Covid-19 was artificially produced through gain-of-function research as either a way to develop defenses against biological weapons or a biological weapon itself, we should heed this reports findings. According to Daily Telegraph: The theory was that if the coronavirus attached itself readily to an animal like a bat or a pangolin, it would have likely been the species that the bug used to make its leap into the human population. However, the modelling found that the coronavirus' spike protein was best suited to attacking protein receptors in humans. "The computer modelling found the virus’s ability to bind to the bat ACE2 protein was poor relative to its ability to bind human cells," said Flinders University epidemiologist and vaccine researcher Professor Nikolai Petrovsky. "This argues against the virus being transmitted directly from bats to humans." What the article doesn't say is what many, particularly in the intelligence and conspiracy communities, have been speculating about for a while. This appears to be a designer coronavirus. In other words, it was made to do exactly what it's doing now, namely spread across the human race at an alarming speed. One can argue that if it was accidentally released, that this was a blessing because they were likely trying to make it more virulent and deadly. The "Biological Weapons Playbook" is pretty straight forward. Step one is to develop a disease that’s under their control. Step two is to make it a mass killer. Step three is to develop a treatment or vaccine to protect China’s own people while killing others. It would appear the coronavirus leaked out somewhere between steps one and two. Nature didn't take bat soup and skip hundreds of generations of mutations to make Covid-19 tailor-made for humans. This was manufactured with intent. The only question is whether it was released intentionally or leaked prematurely. |
| Posted by:Flainter Omert3830 |
| #46 Decade of Vaccines started 2010, Rona 2020. https://www.gatesfoundation.org/Ideas/Media-Center/Press-Releases/2010/12/Global-Health-Leaders-Launch-Decade-of-Vaccines-Collaboration |
| Posted by: jefe101 2021-06-30 21:44 |
| #45 No shit. You really are an expert. Proving you can't fool an old fool. |
| Posted by: Spoter B 2021-06-30 18:44 |
| #44 Grom, if they didn't perform any trials because they heard from the International Bureaucracy that it didn't work before they got around to performing any trials... they'd never get a chance to find out anything. |
| Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain 2021-06-30 18:04 |
| #43 #41 Which part of "researchers outside USA" - for example in Israel, you don't understand? #42 Well, by those standards, I was nearly killed by the establishment-approved IV antibiotics the surgeons had me on for a couple months back in 201whatever... No shit. You really are an expert. |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2021-06-30 17:45 |
| #42 *I do have some minor knowledge in the subjects of immunology, epidemiology, and medical methodology**. **I've written term papers for medical students and grant proposal for medical faculty. Well, by those standards, I was nearly killed by the establishment-approved IV antibiotics the surgeons had me on for a couple months back in 201whatever... my kidneys stopped working and they hospitalized me and _kept me on them_ because it was the lesser of two evils. _Maybe_ they were right, I'm alive, but it was a risk. But with the regulations surrounding HCQ, you can't get it outside a hospital and you don't get them when you go in the hospital. You get Remdesivir _only after the virus has built up a good head of steam_ and you need hospitalization. Do you know what medicine those people in Israel who got the vaccine and then the viral infection are being given in the hospital now? I'm curious. (More specifically, did you know that Remdesivir is currently recommended _against_ by the WHO at the present time, and has been since about November?) |
| Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain 2021-06-30 17:24 |
| #41 G(r)om, keeping the US on the deindustrialization crash slope _is_ that important to them. Putting President Al Zheimer in charge is that important to them, even if his opponent was That Jerk Emmanuel Orangestein. |
| Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain 2021-06-30 17:14 |
| #40 This isn't high school debate. This is you being lied to, and finding out, and failing to adequately follow up. Freudian projection. All other considerations aside*, I don't believe that researchers outside USA would falsify results and kill people to harm Trump - he ain't that important. *I do have some minor knowledge in the subjects of immunology, epidemiology, and medical methodology**. **I've written term papers for medical students and grant proposal for medical faculty. |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2021-06-30 17:03 |
| #39 You did post the link, Snowy Thing. Skidmark provided it in clickable/hotlink form. |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2021-06-30 16:59 |
| #38 I'm sorry, Skid, I thought I'd posted the link. |
| Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain 2021-06-30 15:07 |
| #37 https://anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com/2020/06/how-false-hydroxychloroquine-narrative.html |
| Posted by: Skidmark 2021-06-30 15:00 |
#36 As that link said...8. You publish, in the world's most-read medical journal, the Lancet, an observational study from a massive worldwide database named Surgisphere (which includes 96,000 hospitalized Covid cases) that says use of chloroquine drugs caused significantly increased mortality. This was said to be the paper to end all controversy about HCQ and Covid-19. You make sure that all major media report on this result. This was to be the nail in the coffin for hydroxychloroquine. Then you quickly have 3 European countries announce they will not allow doctors to prescribe the drug. Soon additional countries ban its use for Covid. This isn't high school debate. This is you being lied to, and finding out, and failing to adequately follow up. |
| Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain 2021-06-30 15:00 |
| #35 "Consider a spherical camel..." Evolution of Function and Form in Camelid Erythrocytes |
| Posted by: Skidmark 2021-06-30 14:57 |
| #34 It bothers me that the only clinical trial evidence (which is only evidence that counts) for HCQ efficiency in treating COVID comes not just from China, but from Wuhan Institute in China. The same place the virus that killed 6 million people, so far, came from. Part of this is because it's hard to find stuff these days when the search engines _are the people who helped fund the virus_. Another factor is that the people who helped fund the virus _are also the people who were running the alleged trials in the west that showed it it didn't work_. There's a good rundown here: https://anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com/2020/06/how-false-hydroxychloroquine-narrative.html I can't make you read it and I can't understand it for you. |
| Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain 2021-06-30 14:55 |
| #33 A character rose from the dead - Burgess Meredith |
| Posted by: Cliling Thrirong2360 2021-06-30 14:39 |
| #32 This sounds similar to the notion of anti-virus software companies working on future computer virus detection and another division actually producing the future computer virus. It is good for business. Probably why Fauci and Gates had a vaccine nearly ready for use against COVID. Probably just a premature release due to pending Trump landslide in 2020 election. |
| Posted by: Airandee 2021-06-30 14:39 |
| #31 The French doc had some (anecdotal) success with early treatment, around March 2020, which impressed me. [no piling on!] I swear I read the Indian doctors were dispensing it as a prophylactic earlier this year, but the effect seems to have been overcome by the Indian Variant. |
| Posted by: Bobby 2021-06-30 14:37 |
#30  |
| Posted by: Cliling Thrirong2360 2021-06-30 14:37 |
#29 Covid Monster - example of internet posted toon activity in 2020 |
| Posted by: Cliling Thrirong2360 2021-06-30 14:30 |
| #28 It bothers me that the only clinical trial evidence (which is only evidence that counts) for HCQ efficiency in treating COVID comes not just from China, but from Wuhan Institute in China. The same place the virus that killed 6 million people, so far, came from. It bothers me that there are people in 21st century who believe in miracle cures. It bothers me that people think that high-school debating club strategies can have relevance in the real world. It bothers me that you and your "conservative" pals ignore statistics from Brazil where HCQ use was widespread. But it doesn't bother me even a little bit that some people who rely on HCQ instead of vaccination will die. |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2021-06-30 14:26 |
| #27 It doesn't make you want to go back and look at the other papers No. But Ah'm delighted you are reporting your research. |
| Posted by: Skidmark 2021-06-30 14:20 |
| #26 And it doesn't disturb you that the Lancet was found publishing, allegedly peer reviewed, a paper showing HCQ was ineffective and dangerous, with completely fabricated data? It doesn't make you want to go back and look at the other papers, to see what was wrong with them? Or to look at the PDR (hopefully one from 2019 or earlier) to see where they were dismanaging things? |
| Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain 2021-06-30 13:58 |
| #25 Here's a news item, referenced in Hatfill's letter, talking about HCQ treatment in Korea in Feb 2020. http://www.koreabiomed.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=7428 Just for reference, that's before the March thing from China you're talking about. |
| Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain 2021-06-30 13:55 |
| #24 Published Today Patent document shows that DARPA built COVID with the help of Bill Gates, WHO |
| Posted by: Clyde Sproing5814 2021-06-30 13:51 |
| #23 They are about as similar as humans & squirrels. Mammalian tetrapods! Virtually identical except for some scaling issues and a bit of epigenetics. (I can't help it! For me, "Consider a spherical camel..." is both hilarious and a useful approximation) |
| Posted by: SteveS 2021-06-30 13:46 |
| #22 Hatfill letter is not peer reviewed. It's not a reference. |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2021-06-30 13:27 |
| #21 I've posted the Hatfill letter several times. All you have to do is read it. As a postscript: read this: https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-07-22-fauci-15-years-ago-chloroquine-effective-treating-coronavirus.html Also: https://truepundit.com/deadly-cover-up-fauci-approved-hydroxychloroquine-15-years-ago-to-cure-coronaviruses-nobody-needed-to-die/ |
| Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain 2021-06-30 13:19 |
| #20 They are about as similar as humans & squirrels. So mammals and they like nuts. |
| Posted by: Skidmark 2021-06-30 13:00 |
| #19 TW, SARS‐CoV (causative pathogen of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome or SARS) and SARS‐CoV‐2 (causative pathogen of Coronavirus Disease 2019 or COVID‐19) are positive‐sense RNA viruses belonging to the family of Coronaviridae, able to cause severe respiratory diseases.1, 2, 3, 4 Despite some similarities, they have many differences, especially in terms of epidemiology. The main differences and similarities are summarized in Table Table11. They are about as similar as humans & squirrels. |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2021-06-30 12:54 |
| #18 A great question for future medical forensic historians: Could it have happened without Fauxi and Dasazk's help? |
| Posted by: M. Murcek 2021-06-30 12:28 |
| #17 Covid19 =/= SARS Covid19 is the disease that results from infection by the SARS-2 virus... or vice versa. |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2021-06-30 12:15 |
| #16 I only have access to open source information. But has been pointed out by people who know a great deal more than I on the subject, while some classified information is genuinely unavailable to the general public, much more is the classified analysis of unclassified information. |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2021-06-30 12:13 |
| #15 ^De Nada. |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2021-06-30 11:42 |
| #14 RE #1: Interesting. Thanks for chasing that down, g(r)om! |
| Posted by: SteveS 2021-06-30 11:33 |
| #13 #11 The paper was submitted in March 2020. The experiments were performed in 2019 - and then the snake oil salesman made it a part conservative ideology - who are China's "useful idiots"? The initial discovery was made back in 2005 or so when "Covid" was still known under the original name of "SARS." (a) Covid19 =/= SARS (b) Reference por favor? |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2021-06-30 11:06 |
| #12 So what you are saying is my wife's cats cannot get it? |
| Posted by: swksvolFF 2021-06-30 10:42 |
| #11 Grom: #1... The US knew about HCQ for Covid a lot longer than March 2020. The initial discovery was made back in 2005 or so when "Covid" was still known under the original name of "SARS." In Thailand, I think, because it's in the SE Asian Malarial Zone and was one of the first countries impacted by SARS. It was part of the response plan from back in 2005. When Fauci was appointed President back in March 2020 he threw that whole plan out. They created rigged studies where patients were given overdoses to "prove" the drug was unsafe and they still felt the need to create wholly fabricated data and publish it in the Lancet. And all the medical professionals looked at the Lancet publishing fabricated data and _didn't ask any questions_. |
| Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain 2021-06-30 09:03 |
| #10 #4 That's a whole lot better than what the Establishment Machine's done to Star Trek. I wanna be a Karate Farmer. |
| Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain 2021-06-30 08:54 |
| #9 pointing this out may make black people attack random elderly Chinese |
| Posted by: Retard Strength 2021-06-30 08:49 |
| #8 Given, there are too many $B$/Elites out there that feel we are in desperate need of a Major Population Reduction. It would not surprise me if the real plan was to trim the population to a more manageable number. eg. Georgia Guidestones and the Ten Rules For An “Age of Reason.” 1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature. 2. Guide reproduction wisely – improving fitness and diversity. 3. Unite humanity with a living new language. 4. Rule passion – faith – tradition – and all things with tempered reason. 5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts. 6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court. 7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials. 8. Balance personal rights with social duties. 9. Prize truth – beauty – love – seeking harmony with the infinite. 10. Be not a cancer on the earth – Leave room for nature – Leave room for nature. BTW: Read , (a more Scifi article than fact), study on the possible effects of mRNA Vax's may have on human reproductive cycles. But it does raise valid long term questions. |
| Posted by: NN2N1 2021-06-30 08:17 |
| #7 'Man-Made' is it? Stunned researchers? We've only been saying that here on the Burg since the first person sneezed. How could we have possibly arrived at such a conclusion. |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2021-06-30 07:32 |
| #6 The only question is whether it was released intentionally or leaked prematurely. Notice how quickly, in the face of the usual vile bureaucratic incompetence, the West did in fact come up with means to neutralize or minimize the impact. It was no Black Plague. Which leads me to consider that it was a premature release more accidental than intentional, and that the target may not have been the West per se, but the intended target was to be more along the lines of the Uighur. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2021-06-30 07:20 |
| #5 ^Bingo. |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2021-06-30 04:29 |
#4 Like these?  |
| Posted by: Dron66046 2021-06-30 04:22 |
| #3 ^And give up our cheap consumer products?! |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2021-06-30 04:10 |
| #2 The only question is whether it was released intentionally or leaked prematurely The question is why has China not been attacked [physically, not with slurs] by an alliance of every country affected, and bombed back to Wushu times. |
| Posted by: Dron66046 2021-06-30 04:03 |
| #1 I've tracked dawn the original paper pushing HCQ for Covid19 this version posted March 30, 2020 Efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in patients with COVID-19: results of a randomized clinical trial Zhaowei Chen, View ORCID ProfileJijia Hu, Zongwei Zhang, Shan Jiang, Shoumeng Han, Dandan Yan, Ruhong Zhuang, Ben Hu, Zhan Zhang 1 Department of Nephrology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China. 2 Department of Dermatology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China. 3 Department of Neurosurgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China. 4 Department of Pathology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China. 5 Department of Neurology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China. 6 CAS Key Laboratory of Special Pathogens, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Center for Biosafety Mega-Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430060, China. 7 Department II of Respiratory Disease and Intensive Care, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, Chin |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2021-06-30 03:31 |