| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| Fauci: I Trust Scientists in China to Be Truthful and Forthcoming on COVID Origins |
| 2021-05-30 |
| [BREITBART] During an interview aired on Friday’s broadcast of SiriusXM Urban View’s "The Joe Madison Show," White House Chief Medical Adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci said that he trusts scientists in China to be honest about the origins of COVID-19 and that you have to make a distinction between scientists in China and the country’s government. Host Joe Madison asked, "Do you trust the scientists, your colleagues? You have to work with them in China. Do you trust them to be honest and forthcoming?" Fauci responded, "Well, yeah. Yeah, I think that you have to have a difference between the scientists in China and the Chinese government. I don’t have much insight into the latter. We’ve worked with Chinese scientists for decades and decades, in a collaborative manner with influenza, with bird flu, with a variety of other diseases. And our experience with the scientists has been that they have been of good faith, they’re talented, many of them have made major accomplishments in science, and that’s the reason why we’ve worked with them." |
| Posted by:Fred |
| #18 Sadly, I think somewhere in this twits brain, he believes this. |
| Posted by: Anomalous Sources 2021-05-30 23:04 |
| #17 Many recent internet articles about the devaluation of experts by the general population, based on their observations of the performance of those experts Well, how does one become an "expert?" First there's the credentialing process to gain initial entry to the clerisy. As everyone outside the academic bubble now knows, the credential factories are themselves corrupt, so, at step one, the "expert in training" is part of a corrupt process. Next, having obtained credentials, the "expert in training" has to come under the tutelage of an existing expert. That individual got where they are by playing the appropriate political games to get grants, fellowships, appointments to gummint run or associated institutions (think WHO, NIH, CDC, St. Fauxi's home base of NIAID) So, now our "expert in training is twice tainted. Now, under tutelage, our EIT learns how to also play the political games and slithers along the course. TADA! Newly minted "expert." Who will now train more "up and comers." Can you say "recursively corrupt system," kids? I knew ya could... Marilyn Vos Savant was asked "What makes a person an expert?" Her reply: "An expert is someone who not only knows everything about a subject, but also knows which of that stuff is wrong." Richard Feynman asked to comment on a lecture he obviously disagreed with "That wasn't even wrong." |
| Posted by: M. Murcek 2021-05-30 14:07 |
| #16 Many recent internet articles about the devaluation of experts by the general population, based on their observations of the performance of those experts |
| Posted by: Bubba Lover of the Faeries8843 2021-05-30 12:46 |
| #15 |
| Posted by: swksvolFF 2021-05-30 12:12 |
| #14 He's either lying or he's an idiot. Oh yes, I know. Embrace the power of and. |
| Posted by: Slats Ulerert8448 2021-05-30 12:03 |
| #13 Trust scientists in Communist China? Whatta dupe. I gotta a bridge. |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2021-05-30 09:56 |
| #12 ^Well, for one thing, they're (technically) competent. |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2021-05-30 07:23 |
| #11 Why should they be any different than you? |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2021-05-30 07:17 |
| #10 Yeah,I think that you have to have a difference between the scientists in China and the Chinese government. "Have to have a difference" ?? What does this word salad mean? Other than, I'mnervous and lying |
| Posted by: Varmint Uleque1077 2021-05-30 06:47 |
| #9 I don't. |
| Posted by: Bubba Lover of the Faeries8843 2021-05-30 04:37 |
| #8 I'd like to know what medication he's on. |
| Posted by: Dron66046 2021-05-30 02:43 |
| #7 Beyond a certain point, willful stupidity becomes collaboration. |
| Posted by: Spats Ghibelline1754 2021-05-30 02:40 |
| #6 Hell, Tony, I know people who don't even trust their pure science papers. |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2021-05-30 01:38 |
| #5 ....and that you have to make a distinction between scientists in China and the country’s government. Truly a distinction without a difference. |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2021-05-30 01:11 |
| #4 Right and face the firing squad for their 'truthfulness'. He lives in an alternate reality, clueless ! |
| Posted by: Injun Tojo2762 2021-05-30 01:04 |
| #3 Down $1 |
| Posted by: Flusoper Oppressor of the Lichtensteiners3613 2021-05-30 00:42 |
| #2 Is he really so clueless? Really? And he is the chief medical advisor. Well... that explains a lot. |
| Posted by: CrazyFool 2021-05-30 00:32 |
| #1 ROFLOL!!! |
| Posted by: borgboy 2021-05-30 00:27 |