You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
NYT COVID reporter's claim of lab-leak theory's 'racist roots' hints at paper's news priorities
2021-05-28
[Just The News] New York Times reporter's flippant dismissal of the increasingly popular "lab-leak" COVID-19 origin theory offers a revealing glimpse into the newspaper's pandemic news priorities 18 months into the health crisis that has pervaded world media coverage since early last year.

Apoorva Mandavilli, a longtime science reporter who has been a full-time writer at the Times since May of last year, suggested on Wednesday that growing suspicions that COVID-19 originated in a Chinese virology lab are both misguided and bigoted.

"Someday we will stop talking about the lab leak theory and maybe even admit its racist roots," she wrote on Twitter. "But alas, that day is not yet here."

Mandavilli subsequently deleted that tweet. In a followup post she did not retract her earlier claim about the theory's "racist roots" but rather said that it had been "badly phrased."

"The origin of the pandemic is an important line of reporting that my colleagues are covering aggressively," she wrote.

By Thursday evening Mandavilli's Twitter account appeared to be no longer active. She did not respond to inquiries seeking more information about her opinions on the theory and the reason for her account's disappearance.

Yet her suggestion that the lab-leak theory is both "racist" and unworthy of the discussion it has provoked may shed light on the pandemic coverage priorities of one of the world's most influential papers.
Posted by:Besoeker

#6  I was thinking more like Sao Paulo; then again she'd be dead in 15 minutes.
Posted by: Raj   2021-05-28 09:40  

#5  I'm willing to bet she would experience some real racism if she were dropped into the middle of Beijing by herself.
Posted by: Retard Strength   2021-05-28 07:40  

#4  Actually, the Times' Natalie Angier is (was) excellent.

Natalie Angier received an impressive education:

Angier began her college studies at age 16 at the University of Michigan. After completing two years at the University of Michigan, she studied English, physics, and astronomy at Barnard College, where she graduated magna cum laude in 1978. She also studied medieval literature post graduation.

But we all know that a who studied physics and graduated in 1978 must be a privileged and fragile 'Karen,' so screw her.
Posted by: Phonter Gonque5510   2021-05-28 07:37  

#3  Actually, it would be a surprise (and quick reassignment) if a journalist had any background in the subjects they may cover.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2021-05-28 06:31  

#2  ^Evolutionary theory be hard.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2021-05-28 04:42  

#1  Author Mandavilli writes about medicine appears to have NO medical background, medical or science degree, or training.

Bio found here
Posted by: Besoeker   2021-05-28 04:15  

00:00