Comments

You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name

Your e-mail (optional)

Website (optional)

	My Original Nic Pic-a-Nic Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Foto

Submit your comments on this article

Home Front: Politix

An election audit in New Hampshire may be the pebble that diverts the stream

2021-05-20

[American Thinker] I’ve shied away from reporting on events in Maricopa because it would require more hours than I have in a day to track intelligently the back-and-forth in that recount. My touchstone there is the fact that the Democrats’ and NeverTrumpers’ ferocious efforts to stop the count strike me as the actions of people with something to hide. Otherwise, they’d be there helping to prove that they’re right. Events in a small town in New Hampshire, though, are more interesting because a low-key audit may reveal serious election anomalies harming Republicans.

Windham, New Hampshire, a town of 14,853 people, has long been a stalwart Republican stronghold in an otherwise Democrat state. As was the case throughout New Hampshire, it relied on AccuVote machines to collect and tally its 2020 votes.

When the election in Windham ended, Kristi St. Laurent, the Democrat candidate, had lost by only 24 votes. With that close a margin, she naturally demanded a hand recount.

The hand recount revealed something very peculiar: St. Laurent hadn’t lost by 24 votes; she’d lost by 420 votes. In a small election, that meant that her margin of defeat wasn’t 0.005% but was, instead, 9.6%, which is a significant loss.

That same recount revealed an even greater anomaly: Across the board, in every Windham election, Republicans had been shortchanged and Democrats had been overcounted:

Posted by:Besoeker

#5 #3 - "Shut up, they explained"

Posted by: Frank G 2021-05-20 12:26

#4 in GA, the low tech hand counts following the initial vote matched the machine counts within 1 vote per thousand or so.

Yes, but if you look at the actual videotape it looks like they were dumping fraudulent ballots into the system.

Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain 2021-05-20 12:24

#3 The table at the link is damning. It will be interesting to see how they resolve it.

Posted by: trailing wife 2021-05-20 11:51

#2 in that township, the machine tally differed from the low tech hand count by 5% if I read this right - that is astounding

in GA, the low tech hand counts following the initial vote matched the machine counts within 1 vote per thousand or so.

Posted by: Lord Garth 2021-05-20 11:32

#1

Yet this new Liberalized generation fails to see the impact such Fraudulent voting will have on them in years to come. As it is applied time and time again to accomplish the goals of the few, to control the many.

Posted by: NN2N1 2021-05-20 08:31

00:00