You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Fifth Column
Black Lives Matter co-founder Patrisse Cullors has purchased a $1.4m home in a wealthy secluded area of Los Angeles
2021-04-10
Isn’t she a Maoist?
[PUBLISH.TWITTER]
Related:
Patrisse Cullors: 2020-11-25 BLM demands that Biden support 'roadmap for prison abolition'
Patrisse Cullors: 2020-11-12 Black Lives Matter Pens Letter To Joe Biden And Kamala Harris: 'We Want Something For Our Vote'
Patrisse Cullors: 2020-09-29 Coalition Of Black Pastors Rips Kamala Harris For Celebrating ‘Brilliance' Of Black Lives Matter Founders
Posted by:Fred

#22  Well away from her constituents, and their Antifa water carrying rioters.
Posted by: Slappy   2021-04-10 20:38  

#21  It is just a typical California above the ground cave.
Posted by: crazyhorse   2021-04-10 20:32  

#20  I think when the unintended consequences of the race racket arrive, they will come in hot, and all the media, corporate and political types (but I repeat myself) will be shocked, shocked that they didn't see it coming.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2021-04-10 17:41  

#19   ...until Santa Ana season when those hillsides are likely to catch fire.

If there's karmic justice (and I believe there is such a thing), this house is now in play.
Posted by: Raj   2021-04-10 17:38  

#18  "Bourgeoisiesheviks."
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2021-04-10 16:51  

#17  Location is close to Oprah (up the coast to Montecito) and Hollywood lefties to the east in Bel Air & Brentwood).

Perfect for shaking the big lefty money trees
Posted by: Gromolet the Hairy2384   2021-04-10 14:52  

#16  from Cause to Movement to Racket... in record time
Posted by: Vortigern Elmereting6085   2021-04-10 14:50  

#15  Always remember, to be a good communist, you must be willing to commit armed robbery. C'mon, what do you think Lenin meant when he said you must break a few eggs? It is not an ideology, it is a crime.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2021-04-10 13:11  

#14  Actually, Glenmore has a point. One and a half million doesn't go as far in LA as it would in other parts of the country. But, still, people buy there because it is a desirable location. The picture doesn't look like a mansion but nice enough for a hard core Bolshevik, or even a Maoist. Certainly much, much nicer than one of the apartment blocks they're building for the proletariat. A secluded compound in the hills above Malibu is close to where the action is yet rural and peaceful, until Santa Ana season when those hillsides are likely to catch fire.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2021-04-10 13:02  

#13  Its almost like one of those organizations which was formed then went looking for the right 'Black Owner'.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2021-04-10 12:52  

#12  ^ As Steve Sailer explains, it's location, location, location that makes that shack so valuable.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2021-04-10 12:42  

#11   I see being a 'trained Marxist' pays quite well.

If you're one of the bosses it does.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2021-04-10 12:41  

#10  Isn't that just a little 'starter' house in LA?
Posted by: Glenmore   2021-04-10 10:55  

#9  TL; DR. Executive summary, something nearly everyone agrees on: Some people need killing.
Posted by: Unolurong Angaviger1179   2021-04-10 10:11  

#8  Even the one percent in the Soviet Union had their dachas. Our Marxists just have theirs in the HGTV styles.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2021-04-10 09:55  

#7  Sometimes entertaining, always fascinating.
Rest well Dron.
Posted by: Skidmark   2021-04-10 09:44  

#6  I see being a 'trained Marxist' pays quite well.
Posted by: Raj   2021-04-10 08:35  

#5  /\ The world is actually going to come to an understanding sooner or later about this, and societies shall probably re-segregate

"Lost Languages" (over 500 to date worldwide), and forgotten societies, became 'lost' and 'forgotten' for a valid reason, generally not by choice.
Posted by: Besoeker   2021-04-10 07:06  

#4  The Black Lives Matter thingy has actually given justification to theories of some of us who were always of the opinion that 'some lives matter more than others'. It drives home a point, with it's ill-advised caption. Make no mistake, it doesn't mean that 'black lives matter too!' It was always supposed to mean 'only black lives should matter!' In fact, across the world, minorities trapped in their recidivist cultures have blamed the rest of society for vilifying them and played race, color and caste cards to carve out dominions of primitive tribal control for themselves. Leeching increasingly considerate socialist states and reserving the right to submit to or reject the constitutions, these people thrive in the midst of otherwise modern societies; shitholes and body dumps next to residentials and malls. So do not think for a second this problem is known only to America, or about only skin color. It is about cultures featuring criminality and corruption assaulting cultures featuring civility and cooperation as standards.

The world is divided apparently into too diverse a menagerie of fauna to categorize each group accurately, but one thing is as obvious as the screen in your face. There are only two basic types. The ones on the side of civilization, and the ones standing in its way. Also evident, although denied by everyone, is the fact that not every life matters. If anyone says differently they are bloody liars. The Kurds, fighting alongside US troops against the daesh for instance, cease to matter when a NATO member slays them. Jews in Europe, valued by one administration, de-valued and targeted by goons of the next, in the same society. Christians, the bane of the progressive anime doll humpers and body modification aficionados, paid lip service to by rich charismatics, cheated by everyone and still hopeful. Bubba, the taxpaying 9 to 5er, with his bills and kids and urgent need of type B octagonal premium garden hose socket. To some, these are all expendable, even adversaries. When the time comes for cultures to clash so violently that some seek to supplant and exterminate or enslave others, it falls on the State to violently deter their progress.

Just whose life does matter then? Everyone will claim they deserve to survive over others. For example, to the criminal, only his/her life matters. To the muslim, only muslim lives matter. To every narrow minded, supremacist bastard in the world, only certain lives matter. Even to me, lives of servicemen and soldiers matter just a little bit more than the average ingrate yuppie. If the jihad, the intifads, ISIS, BLM, Antifa... have taught people something, it should be this: Some cultures espouse a pressing need to violently replace others. And the State that choose to not wipe them out completely, is failing the citizen, failing civilization itself.

In my view, the task of a responsible State is a) to correctly estimate just which citizens in the population are of a quality that is positively valued, b) to secure their lives, their dignity and progress, and c) to identify 'negatively valued' individuals and eliminate them.

Some societies have tried things like a merit point system to segregate society into groups, albeit with skewed criteria, which are then awarded a deservability based on their value. It can be modified further, by smarter men. Even those who choose to live secluded and non-committal existences not having much to do with society, need not be harassed for value. It must not be about extracting value from people, or rewarding some faux-patriotic poseurs, like communism demands. It must only be confined to identifying which are the ones taking away from shared value, the negatives. And exterminating as many as possible, for the betterment of humanity and for the sake of deterring de-civilizers. I'd like to mention again that race or color has nothing to do with it, only culture. The more modern the State, the more liberal and progressive, the more it is failing to deliver on its core responsibilities in treating all possible cultures with fairness. Unfair cultures deserve prejudiced treatment.

The world is actually going to come to an understanding sooner or later about this, and societies shall probably re-segregate, to hell with what Soros and his ilk want. The majorities of other nations will not let 'diversity' be officially raped into them. People will learn from America and emerge yet aggressively recalcitrant to empower their own 'minorities'. It may not be 'just', but it will be a natural reaction. Civilization always finds a way to survive, circumnavigating and even violently opposing idiots of the sort who think technology and legislation can conquer humanity and make it perform suicidally stupid actions. I believe that polite rationality and civility of the masses too will give way in the near future, after much economic harm and misery has been caused by the de-civilizers, the ones lobbying and struggling for chaos. If not America, then other societies will finally demonstrate the meaning of 'survival of the fittest' as against 'survival of the represented'. Only those lives will matter then, which majorities approves of.

Dron, you ass... go to sleep, you need it.


Posted by: Dron66046   2021-04-10 03:42  

#3  I'm sure someone will write her a loophole...
Posted by: CrazyFool   2021-04-10 01:38  

#2  will lose it i a year or 2 when the taxes come due
Posted by: Chris   2021-04-10 00:42  

#1  Absolutely shocking !
Posted by: Besoeker   2021-04-10 00:25  

00:00